On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 3:17 PM, David Hyatt wrote:
> On Jul 13, 2009, at 5:02 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
>
> This small interval rule-of-thumb idea sounds pretty good, but I still
>> wish it didn't put the burden on the guy doing the branch to figure out what
>> is or isn't incomplete about a part
On Jul 13, 2009, at 5:17 PM, David Hyatt wrote:
It's the organization shipping their product that should be working
to determine when their product is shippable.
This may in fact be the most incomprehensible sentence I have ever
typed. :)
dave
(hy...@apple.com)
___
On Jul 13, 2009, at 5:02 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
This small interval rule-of-thumb idea sounds pretty good, but I
still wish it didn't put the burden on the guy doing the branch to
figure out what is or isn't incomplete about a particular snapshot
of WebKit. That guy might not be savy enou
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> On Jul 13, 2009, at 11:57 AM, David Hyatt wrote:
>
> On Jul 13, 2009, at 1:52 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 11:40 AM, David Hyatt wrote:
>
>> On Jul 13, 2009, at 12:52 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 1
On Jul 13, 2009, at 11:57 AM, David Hyatt wrote:
On Jul 13, 2009, at 1:52 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 11:40 AM, David Hyatt
wrote:
On Jul 13, 2009, at 12:52 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 10:47 AM, David Hyatt
wrote:
I agree. We should formalize t
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 11:57 AM, David Hyatt wrote:
> On Jul 13, 2009, at 1:52 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 11:40 AM, David Hyatt wrote:
>
>> On Jul 13, 2009, at 12:52 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 10:47 AM, David Hyatt wrote:
>>
>>> I agree. W
On Jul 13, 2009, at 1:52 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 11:40 AM, David Hyatt wrote:
On Jul 13, 2009, at 12:52 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 10:47 AM, David Hyatt
wrote:
I agree. We should formalize this as policy too in my opinion.
Maybe something ti
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 11:40 AM, David Hyatt wrote:
> On Jul 13, 2009, at 12:52 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 10:47 AM, David Hyatt wrote:
>
>> I agree. We should formalize this as policy too in my opinion. Maybe
>> something time-based, e.g., if you have an implementat
On Jul 13, 2009, at 12:52 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 10:47 AM, David Hyatt wrote:
I agree. We should formalize this as policy too in my opinion.
Maybe something time-based, e.g., if you have an implementation of a
new Web technology that is going to take > (1month?)
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 10:47 AM, David Hyatt wrote:
> I agree. We should formalize this as policy too in my opinion. Maybe
> something time-based, e.g., if you have an implementation of a new Web
> technology that is going to take > (1month?) to implement, then the feature
> should be landed i
2009/7/13 Peter Kasting :
> When it relands I will see if I can figure out what the ENABLE flag should
> cover and make sure it's covered. I'm concerned about other things already
> in the tree with "valid" in their name, e.g. "readonly attribute boolean
> willValidate" -- not sure if these shoul
2009/7/13 Darin Fisher :
> I'd like to propose that we add an ENABLE_FORM_VALIDATION flag (or something
> similarly named). I'm writing this to webkit-dev because I want to make
> sure that other new web platform features that may be in development get
> similar treatment while they are still in
I agree. We should formalize this as policy too in my opinion. Maybe
something time-based, e.g., if you have an implementation of a new Web
technology that is going to take > (1month?) to implement, then the
feature should be landed inside ENABLE ifdefs (that can then be
removed when the
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
> I'd like to propose that we add an ENABLE_FORM_VALIDATION flag (or
> something similarly named). I'm writing this to webkit-dev because I want
> to make sure that other new web platform features that may be in development
> get similar trea
I noticed that some new form validation code is landing (e.g.,
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/45739). That change adds stubs for the
ValidityState object. What I didn't see in that patch is any kind of ENABLE
flag. I suspect there should be one since otherwise it becomes difficult
for a web de
15 matches
Mail list logo
