Re: [webkit-dev] Top 100 sites browsing tests proprosal

2012-04-30 Thread Ryosuke Niwa
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 3:29 AM, Sergio Villar Senin wrote: > En 27/04/12 01:19, Ryosuke Niwa escribiu: > > See my posts about archive.org-based performance tests. We can use the > > same infrastructure to make sure WebKit doesn't crash :) > > Yeah that's great! I just forgot to replay to that thr

Re: [webkit-dev] Top 100 sites browsing tests proprosal

2012-04-30 Thread Sergio Villar Senin
En 27/04/12 01:19, Ryosuke Niwa escribiu: > See my posts about archive.org-based performance tests. We can use the > same infrastructure to make sure WebKit doesn't crash :) Yeah that's great! I just forgot to replay to that thread :) > In fact... running top 100 websites as performance tests mig

Re: [webkit-dev] Top 100 sites browsing tests proprosal

2012-04-26 Thread Ryosuke Niwa
See my posts about archive.org-based performance tests. We can use the same infrastructure to make sure WebKit doesn't crash :) In fact... running top 100 websites as performance tests might just do the trick because we'll catch any crashes (can't catch assertion failures though :( ). On Sat, Jan

Re: [webkit-dev] Top 100 sites browsing tests proprosal

2012-01-23 Thread Joe Mason
; -Original Message- > From: webkit-dev-boun...@lists.webkit.org [mailto:webkit-dev- > boun...@lists.webkit.org] On Behalf Of Pablo Flouret > Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 2:45 AM > To: Sergio Villar Senin > Cc: webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org > Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] Top 1

Re: [webkit-dev] Top 100 sites browsing tests proprosal

2012-01-23 Thread Joe Mason
t-dev-boun...@lists.webkit.org [mailto:webkit-dev-boun...@lists.webkit.org] On Behalf Of Peter Kasting Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2012 3:01 PM To: Balazs Kelemen Cc: webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] Top 100 sites browsing tests proprosal On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Balazs Kelemen m

Re: [webkit-dev] Top 100 sites browsing tests proprosal

2012-01-23 Thread Tony Gentilcore
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 2:14 AM, Aaron Boodman wrote: > On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Peter Kasting wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Balazs Kelemen wrote: >>> >>> As the goal is to test "real world" use case I think it can be even better >>> to simply load the sites from network.

Re: [webkit-dev] Top 100 sites browsing tests proprosal

2012-01-23 Thread Zoltan Herczeg
> But are you planning to run test builds against live websites? That's > not very polite on people's servers (i certainly wouldn't like anyone > stress-testing my own servers for their benefit). And like some other > people said, tests that rely on network randomness are not very > reliable indica

Re: [webkit-dev] Top 100 sites browsing tests proprosal

2012-01-22 Thread Pablo Flouret
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 11:37 PM, Sergio Villar Senin wrote: > En 22/01/12 20:24, Thiago Marcos P. Santos escribiu: >> On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Pablo Flouret >> Maybe instead of storing a local snapshot (assuming you need static >> content for the tests), you can use a online snapshot of

Re: [webkit-dev] Top 100 sites browsing tests proprosal

2012-01-22 Thread Sergio Villar Senin
En 22/01/12 20:24, Thiago Marcos P. Santos escribiu: > On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Pablo Flouret Maybe instead of storing a local snapshot (assuming you need static > content for the tests), you can use a online snapshot of a top 100 > website from http://web.archive.org for validation. Not s

Re: [webkit-dev] Top 100 sites browsing tests proprosal

2012-01-22 Thread Aaron Boodman
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Peter Kasting wrote: > On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Balazs Kelemen wrote: >> >> As the goal is to test "real world" use case I think it can be even better >> to simply load the sites from network. >> I see only two disadvantage of that but neither of them ar

Re: [webkit-dev] Top 100 sites browsing tests proprosal

2012-01-22 Thread Peter Kasting
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Balazs Kelemen wrote: > As the goal is to test "real world" use case I think it can be even better > to simply load the sites from network. > I see only two disadvantage of that but neither of them are blocker: >1. The sites changing over time. However, as th

Re: [webkit-dev] Top 100 sites browsing tests proprosal

2012-01-22 Thread Balazs Kelemen
On 01/22/2012 08:24 PM, Thiago Marcos P. Santos wrote: On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Pablo Flouret > wrote: On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 2:52 AM, Sergio Villar Senin mailto:svil...@igalia.com>> wrote: > En 21/01/12 14:31, Zoltan Herczeg escribiu: >> Just

Re: [webkit-dev] Top 100 sites browsing tests proprosal

2012-01-22 Thread Thiago Marcos P. Santos
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Pablo Flouret wrote: > On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 2:52 AM, Sergio Villar Senin > wrote: > > En 21/01/12 14:31, Zoltan Herczeg escribiu: > >> Just be careful with copyright issues. > > > > Could you elaborate on that? > > I believe you'd need explicit permission from

Re: [webkit-dev] Top 100 sites browsing tests proprosal

2012-01-22 Thread Adam Barth
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 3:06 AM, Pablo Flouret wrote: > On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 2:52 AM, Sergio Villar Senin > wrote: >> En 21/01/12 14:31, Zoltan Herczeg escribiu: >>> Just be careful with copyright issues. >> >> Could you elaborate on that? > > I believe you'd need explicit permission from eac

Re: [webkit-dev] Top 100 sites browsing tests proprosal

2012-01-22 Thread Pablo Flouret
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 2:52 AM, Sergio Villar Senin wrote: > En 21/01/12 14:31, Zoltan Herczeg escribiu: >> Just be careful with copyright issues. > > Could you elaborate on that? I believe you'd need explicit permission from each website owner to keep a (public-facing) copy of the pages you int

Re: [webkit-dev] Top 100 sites browsing tests proprosal

2012-01-22 Thread Sergio Villar Senin
En 21/01/12 14:31, Zoltan Herczeg escribiu: > Just be careful with copyright issues. Could you elaborate on that? BR ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev

Re: [webkit-dev] Top 100 sites browsing tests proprosal

2012-01-21 Thread Zoltan Herczeg
Just be careful with copyright issues. Regards, Zoltan > Go for it. > > Adam > > > On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 2:12 AM, Sergio Villar Senin > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've been thinking about this for some time now, but only a recent bug >> I'm constantly hitting these days >> (https://bugs.webkit.org/sh

Re: [webkit-dev] Top 100 sites browsing tests proprosal

2012-01-21 Thread Adam Barth
Go for it. Adam On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 2:12 AM, Sergio Villar Senin wrote: > Hi, > > I've been thinking about this for some time now, but only a recent bug > I'm constantly hitting these days > (https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76574) triggered this email > [1]. What I would like to pro

[webkit-dev] Top 100 sites browsing tests proprosal

2012-01-21 Thread Sergio Villar Senin
Hi, I've been thinking about this for some time now, but only a recent bug I'm constantly hitting these days (https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76574) triggered this email [1]. What I would like to propose here is to have a battery of tests that would check that the most visited sites (let's