On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote:
Safari 5.0.3 will always report a build version of 533.19.4. Safari 5.0.4
will always report a build version of 533.20.27. You already used the former
Hello WebKit developers,
I've created a draft blog post at http://www.webkit.org/blog/?p=1580 about
the recent changes I and others have made to the UA string. I'm interested
in any feedback you might have.
I've written a similar blog post, but focused on Chrome and aimed at a wider
audience,
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
I've created a draft blog post at http://www.webkit.org/blog/?p=1580 about
the recent changes I and others have made to the UA string. I'm interested
in any feedback you might have.
Note, since this is a draft, you
On Mar 25, 2011, at 1:53 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
UA String Changes On WebKit Trunk
Posted by Peter Kasting on Friday, March 25th, 2011 at 10:44 am
Recently some changes to the UA string (tracked by
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54556) have landed. These changes
are designed to
Hi Peter,
I think you should say User Agent String in the title and maybe in
the first paragraph say User Agent (UA) string, so that it's not
quite as cryptic.
The inline URLs are a bit ugly, perhaps some changes could be turned
into a link to the tracking bug and similar changes in Firefox 4
[mailto:webkit-dev-boun...@lists.webkit.org] On Behalf Of Peter Kasting
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2011 6:53 PM
To: webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] UA string changes blog draft
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
I've created a draft
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Patrick R. Gansterer par...@paroga.comwrote:
If you take a look at
http://trac.webkit.org/browser/trunk/Source/WebKit/wince/WebCoreSupport/FrameLoaderClientWinCE.cpp#L57I’m
not sure if point 5 is correct. ;-)
The WinCE port has still my initial UA string
I've incorporated all the existing feedback into the draft. Feel free to
take another look.
PK
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
The blog post begs the question made me wonder.
Why was Macintosh; kept when it is redundant with Intel Mac OS X
10_6_7?
The reasoning seem analogous to what was given for why Windows; was
removed.
dave
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
I've
Ugh my strikethrough on begs the question was lost (and I meant that
phrase as a joke).
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:54 AM, David Levin le...@google.com wrote:
The blog post begs the question made me wonder.
Why was Macintosh; kept when it is redundant with Intel Mac OS X
10_6_7?
The
-dev@lists.webkit.org
Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] UA string changes blog draft
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Patrick R. Gansterer par...@paroga.com
wrote:
If you take a look at
http://trac.webkit.org/browser/trunk/Source/WebKit/wince/WebCoreSupport/Fram
eLoaderClientWinCE.cpp#L57 I'm not sure
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:54 AM, David Levin le...@google.com wrote:
The blog post begs the question made me wonder.
Why was Macintosh; kept when it is redundant with Intel Mac OS X
10_6_7?
The reasoning seem analogous to what was given for why Windows; was
removed.
Unlike Windows, the
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
I've incorporated all the existing feedback into the draft. Feel free to
take another look.
Since some folks seem to be unable to see the draft even while logged in,
here's the new fulltext.
PK
---
User Agent
On 2011-03-25, at 12:07, Peter Kasting wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
I've incorporated all the existing feedback into the draft. Feel free to
take another look.
Since some folks seem to be unable to see the draft even while logged in,
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote:
Is there some reason why these examples use manufactured Safari build
numbers? It's implausible that a version of Safari with a build number of
534.24 would ever claim to be version 5.0.3.
Sorry, I wasn't sure what the right
On 2011-03-25, at 12:56, Peter Kasting wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote:
Is there some reason why these examples use manufactured Safari build
numbers? It's implausible that a version of Safari with a build number of
534.24 would ever claim to be
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote:
On 2011-03-25, at 12:56, Peter Kasting wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote:
Is there some reason why these examples use manufactured Safari build
numbers? It's implausible that a version
17 matches
Mail list logo
