With snow leopard most of the system apps will be 64-bit.
Me too wanna switch... but I'll wait a bit more...
On Jun 30, 2009, at 12:39 AM, David Holt wrote:
Switching to 64 bit now! Thanks guys,
David
On 29-Jun-09, at 6:30 PM, Andrew Lindesay wrote:
Hi David;
From memory it is the Core 2
Switching to 64 bit now! Thanks guys,
David
On 29-Jun-09, at 6:30 PM, Andrew Lindesay wrote:
Hi David;
From memory it is the Core 2 Duo processors which are able to work
in 64bit mode. The earlier MacBook Pros (like the one sitting in
front of me from 2006) is a Core Duo and is only able
Has anyone discovered what would be causing the loss of the Contents/ entry for
images. I had an app where this was working fine and just started it again to
find my component images all having bad links.
> We are getting URLs like /app.woa/WebServerResources/... when we
> expect
> (and h
Yep, my MBP doesn't support 64-bit... it's the very first one Core
Duo. I believe for 64-bit you have to have a Core "2" Duo.
I'm using WOLips 3.4.5827 which I got from
http://webobjects.mdimension.com/wolips/eclipse_3_5/
I selected the standard install and then deselected the "WOLips
Good
Hi Kieran;
What sort of host is that one?
cheers.
My current Activity Monitor right now on Leopard. showing apache
and mysql 64bit are running (switching this thread to woproject
since I expect apple wo-dev to stop the email due to size
___
Andrew Lindesay
www.lindesay.co.nz
Hi Quinton,
I was under the impression too that Core 2 Duos did not support 64bit,
but told me that every Intel since Core
2 Duo supports 64bit. went so far as to
say that we should be choosing 64bit versions of apps rather than
32bit, since we will be upgrading to Snow Leopard soon and
Hi David;
From memory it is the Core 2 Duo processors which are able to work in
64bit mode. The earlier MacBook Pros (like the one sitting in front
of me from 2006) is a Core Duo and is only able to run in 32bit mode.
cheers.
Is it a chip that allows 64 bit or the operating system? I was
Is it a chip that allows 64 bit or the operating system? I was under
the impression that Leopard wasn't quite there yet...
David
On 29-Jun-09, at 5:25 PM, Q wrote:
On 30/06/2009, at 10:22 AM, Kieran Kelleher wrote:
Hola Ricardo, :-)
If you are on intel, try 64-bit version.
I don't thi
On 30/06/2009, at 10:22 AM, Kieran Kelleher wrote:
Hola Ricardo, :-)
If you are on intel, try 64-bit version.
I don't think his model of MBP support's 64bit.
On Jun 29, 2009, at 5:29 PM, Ricardo J. Parada wrote:
I was excited to try Eclipse 3.5, the Cocoa 32-bit version... At
first
Hola Ricardo, :-)
If you are on intel, try 64-bit version.
Regards, Kieran
On Jun 29, 2009, at 5:29 PM, Ricardo J. Parada wrote:
I was excited to try Eclipse 3.5, the Cocoa 32-bit version... At
first it seemed faster but then after half an hour it got really
slow. So slow that every k
Hello Mike / Pierre;
Are you proposing this change for the core WebObjects frameworks or
as an additional framework (eg; Wonder)?
At a minimum, it would be a custom association factory in Wonder ...
The capability itself, though, is really cool, and I think it would be
generally useful to p
Hello Mike / Pierre;
Are you proposing this change for the core WebObjects frameworks or as
an additional framework (eg; Wonder)?
cheers.
I suppose we just need to integrate them as association and add them
to the association factory. This is trivial to do.
___
Andrew Lindesay
www.lindes
I suppose we just need to integrate them as association and add them
to the association factory. This is trivial to do.
yeah, i'm pretty sure 5.4's parser can do it with a custom factory,
but I'm concerned about how much typing it will require to actually
use it ... helpers are cool because i
I was excited to try Eclipse 3.5, the Cocoa 32-bit version... At
first it seemed faster but then after half an hour it got really
slow. So slow that every keystroke would take between 10 secs to a
couple of minutes to appear. I don't see this on the 3.4 version.
The 3.4 does run out
I did deselect these two, but after got error message in install details
page, then the "Finish" button was not enabled.
This time I am not select these two at the beginning page, so works.
thanks, I can try Eclips3.5 with WOlips now,
Kevin
_
From: Q [mailto:qdo...@gmail.com]
Sen
I suppose we just need to integrate them as association and add them
to the association factory. This is trivial to do.
Pierre
--
Pierre Frisch
pie...@apple.com
On Jun 29, 2009, at 10:37, Mike Schrag wrote:
I didn't know helper functions.
They are fantastic!
... and yeah, I love these and u
On Jun 29, 2009, at 12:28 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
* though not technically a parser feature, I think our if/else
syntax makes more logical sense -- this is a total religious
debate though
For the record, Mike is wrong on this one. The WOML syntax is
correct.
I think it's fairly obviously t
* though not technically a parser feature, I think our if/else
syntax makes more logical sense -- this is a total religious
debate though
For the record, Mike is wrong on this one. The WOML syntax is
correct.
I think it's fairly obviously that Drew and I are going to require
counseling to
On Jun 29, 2009, at 12:02 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
* though not technically a parser feature, I think our if/else
syntax makes more logical sense -- this is a total religious
debate though
For the record, Mike is wrong on this one. The WOML syntax is
correct.
I think it's fairly obviously
* though not technically a parser feature, I think our if/else
syntax makes more logical sense -- this is a total religious debate
though
For the record, Mike is wrong on this one. The WOML syntax is
correct.
I think it's fairly obviously that Drew and I are going to require
counseling t
* though not technically a parser feature, I think our if/else
syntax makes more logical sense -- this is a total religious debate
though
For the record, Mike is wrong on this one. The WOML syntax is correct.
- Drew
---
Drew Davidson
___
Do not
Thank you thank you I finally got this to work with the AjaxModalDialog. It
is not exactly what I wanted (I would have preferred to get the
AjaxModalContainer working correctly), but it will suffice.
I am beginning to think the problem with the AjaxModalContainer is a bug and
not my fault.
The highlight should be very very very useful :-)
Thanks
I also have some "helper" funtions, but they are not implemented in
the ognl helper way ( I think i will port to ognl )
:-)
On 29/giu/09, at 19:33, Mike Schrag wrote:
are just examples, or they are implementer in WOOGNL ?
these are
I didn't know helper functions.
They are fantastic!
... and yeah, I love these and use them a lot, but i was going to talk
to drew about what would be required to support them in the new parser.
ms
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They wi
are just examples, or they are implementer in WOOGNL ?
these are in our internal frameworks ... we actually have a LOT of
these. I should put them in a framework or something.
ms ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webo
Hi MikeI didn't know helper functions.They are fantastic!I'm reading at: http://wiki.objectstyle.org/confluence/display/WOL/WOOGNL+Helper+FunctionsNow, the examples...Other handy uses of helpers that we have in our own code:StringHelper.sanitize(String str) – remove dangerous HTML and _javascript_
I remember that if you add the local machine (127.0.0.1) you cannot
add others
On 29/giu/09, at 16:33, Simon McLean wrote:
Hi All -
i found the post below which is from late 2007 and i have almost
exactly the same problem (the only difference being that our servers
do have domain names)
Unf
Hi All -
i found the post below which is from late 2007 and i have almost
exactly the same problem (the only difference being that our servers
do have domain names)
Unfortunately nobody replied to the original post :-(
Anyone got any ideas on what is wrong with monitor?
Thanks, Simon
HI --
* technically mixed wod/inline isn't a limitation of their parser, but
it's a practical limitation of the way it's loaded ... so I'll list it
in the pro column for woognl
* helper functions = pro -- it can be done with their association
factory, but at a syntactic sacrifice, i think
* though
Just a question...
The pro/cons using WOOGNL instead WO 5.4 inline bindings ?
1) mixed inline and wod
2) ...?
n) ... ?
On 29/giu/09, at 13:49, Mike Schrag wrote:
I sent all my examples from WOWODC to Mike Schrag after the
presentation; hopefully he could put them someplace where people
IMHO It's not a bug, it's just different behaviour.
The problem some people/projects are hitting is that they feed an URL
from a file through URLDecoder and that will convert the plus signs
(that are now often part of the path) into spaces resulting in file
not found exceptions.
I think i
I sent all my examples from WOWODC to Mike Schrag after the
presentation; hopefully he could put them someplace where people can
get them.
btw ... Drew's examples will be part of the WOWODC video release.
ms
___
Do not post admin requests to the li
I'm not sure this is actually wrong ... the tmp folder after the
update is the new tmp folder style in Leopard. I wouldn't think most
apps would care what the tmp folder location is?
ms
On Jun 29, 2009, at 7:20 AM, Kieran Kelleher wrote:
Sounds like it should be "fixed" in ERXApplication c
Sounds like it should be "fixed" in ERXApplication constructor .
and since you have commit access Timo :-)
On Jun 29, 2009, at 4:19 AM, Timo Hoepfner wrote:
Hi,
just FYI. Java 5 Update 4 changed the default for java.io.tmpdir.
This affects File.createTempFile(...).
Previously it
Hi,
just FYI. Java 5 Update 4 changed the default for java.io.tmpdir. This
affects File.createTempFile(...).
Previously it would create paths like:
/tmp/FOO-2946977911338389380.tmp
Now it will create create paths like:
/var/folders/Lh/LhcGbUPf2RWMKk+1YwshfU+++TI/-Tmp-/
FOO-294697791133838
35 matches
Mail list logo
