Hai,
I need a example application for *AjaxUpdateContainer*, the example would be
using two lists(WOBrowser),
first one is available list and second is target, when i click on
Add(WOActiveImage) then the selected item
will be added from available to target,the lists should be refreshed without
re
that's one for anjo ... i've never used them. i remember he looked at them
about a year ago and said something about how it seemed pretty slick (the
framework, not the gui). maybe he can comment tomorrow ...
ms
On Jan 19, 2010, at 11:06 PM, Mat Johnson wrote:
> Mike,
>
> I created the D2WS pr
Mike,
I created the D2WS project and realized that the WebServicesAssistant
didn't work so I manually created the rules via Rule Modeler but with
no luck. If this should work then I'd better figure out what could be
wrong with my rules. Do you think this method is worth pursuing?
Thank
Way too awesome. Thanks to the overlords... and to the underlords like Mike
who mediate between the overlords and the peasants (that's us common
"in-the-dark" folk ;-) )
-Kieran
On Jan 19, 2010, at 5:23 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
>> http://emerald.hq.mdimension.com:8080/hudson/job/Wonder54/ja
> That's what I meant (but wasn't clear)... you just no longer have a nice
> wizard...
> Of course, if you can install WO5.3 on say Tiger/Leopard you might be in luck?
yeah ... if anyone felt like remaking it, i can't imagine that particular tool
was hard to build.
ms
__
That's what I meant (but wasn't clear)... you just no longer have a nice
wizard...
Of course, if you can install WO5.3 on say Tiger/Leopard you might be in luck?
On 20/01/2010, at 2:18 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
> D2WS is just rule-based ... I'm almost positive Anjo used it
> not-too-long-ago. You
D2WS is just rule-based ... I'm almost positive Anjo used it not-too-long-ago.
You just don't have the tool to build the rules for you. I can't imagine why
the underlying framework would no longer function.
On Jan 19, 2010, at 9:59 PM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
> On 20/01/2010, at 1:37 PM, Mat Johnso
On 20/01/2010, at 2:06 PM, Mat Johnson wrote:
> What a bummer. Is there a list of "This works and this doesn't" anywhere
> that can help a fella avoid starting down a dead-end route?
Sounds like a good idea. But not that I'm aware of. Basic rule of thumb though
is that the WO tools are gone, b
What a bummer. Is there a list of "This works and this doesn't"
anywhere that can help a fella avoid starting down a dead-end route?
Thanks for the reply and direction on services.
On Jan 19, 2010, at 8:59 PM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
On 20/01/2010, at 1:37 PM, Mat Johnson wrote:
Does anythin
On 20/01/2010, at 1:37 PM, Mat Johnson wrote:
> Does anything about Direct to WebServices work in 5.4 and Eclipse?
Given that this relied on the Apple WO tools previously installed with Xcode
but subsequently deprecated/removed... I don't think D2WS works, but having
never used D2WS I couldn't
Does anything about Direct to WebServices work in 5.4 and Eclipse? or
is there a better and easy way to accomplish basic services?
Thanks.
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-
Am 20.01.2010 um 01:10 schrieb Anjo Krank:
> No. Actually I'm surprised it *does* work with 5.4...
But whatever, it's totally, royally cool! So be sure to check it out!
Cheers, Anjo
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Web
You mean the 5.4.x that didn't happen to suck? Pity that's not released :)
Cheers, Anjo
Am 20.01.2010 um 01:22 schrieb msch...@mdimension.com:
> Technically it was developed against something 5.4ish.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jan 19, 2010, at 7:11 PM, "Anjo Krank" wrote:
>
>> No. Actuall
Technically it was developed against something 5.4ish.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 19, 2010, at 7:11 PM, "Anjo Krank" wrote:
No. Actually I'm surprised it *does* work with 5.4...
Cheers, Anjo
Am 20.01.2010 um 00:46 schrieb Peter Vandoros:
Hi Mike,
Quick question, does this only work with
Should work on all versions.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 19, 2010, at 6:47 PM, "Peter Vandoros"
wrote:
Hi Mike,
Quick question, does this only work with WO 5.4?
Regards,
Peter
On 20/01/2010, at 9:23 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
http://emerald.hq.mdimension.com:8080/hudson/job/Wonder54/javado
No. Actually I'm surprised it *does* work with 5.4...
Cheers, Anjo
Am 20.01.2010 um 00:46 schrieb Peter Vandoros:
> Hi Mike,
>
> Quick question, does this only work with WO 5.4?
>
> Regards,
>
> Peter
>
> On 20/01/2010, at 9:23 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
>
>>> http://emerald.hq.mdimension.com
Hi Mike,
Quick question, does this only work with WO 5.4?
Regards,
Peter
On 20/01/2010, at 9:23 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
http://emerald.hq.mdimension.com:8080/hudson/job/Wonder54/javadoc/er/profiling/package-summary.html
Bah ... sorry. link to our internal build server. THAT'S not gonna
work
Thanks Mike and overlords,
Peter
On 20/01/2010, at 9:14 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
http://emerald.hq.mdimension.com:8080/hudson/job/Wonder54/javadoc/er/profiling/package-summary.html
... doesn't actually depend on anything in Wonder, so you should be
able to use it anywhere. Thank our overlords
This could not have come at a better time for us. (Well, ok, a couple years
ago, but still.) W!
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Up
Thanks.
That looks impressive and useful!
With Kind Regards,
Dennis Gaastra,
Chief Technology Officer,
WEBAPPZ® Systems, Inc.
On 2010-01-19, at 2:23 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
>> http://emerald.hq.mdimension.com:8080/hudson/job/Wonder54/javadoc/er/profiling/package-summary.html
> Bah ... sorr
> http://emerald.hq.mdimension.com:8080/hudson/job/Wonder54/javadoc/er/profiling/package-summary.html
Bah ... sorry. link to our internal build server. THAT'S not gonna work.
http://webobjects.mdimension.com/hudson/job/Wonder54/javadoc/er/profiling/package-summary.html
ms
_
http://emerald.hq.mdimension.com:8080/hudson/job/Wonder54/javadoc/er/profiling/package-summary.html
... doesn't actually depend on anything in Wonder, so you should be able to use
it anywhere. Thank our overlords at iTMS for allowing me to release this.
ms
__
On 19/01/2010, at 9:57 PM, David Avendasora wrote:
> Again, just thinking out loud. Not sure if any of this will work in the real
> WOrld. :-)
Thanks for the thoughts. Doing it in a general way certainly seems quite
complex.
--
Paul.
http://logicsquad.net/
__
On 20/01/2010, at 5:16 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
>> I was just reading Johan Henselmans's thread entitled "validating deleting
>> an object with relationship", and it reminded me of a similar question I had
>> recently: is there a convenient way to ask EOF if a particular EO _would be_
>> deletable
On 20/01/2010, at 1:01 AM, Ramsey Gurley wrote:
> Using Wonder?
In fact, yes!
> This might be of some help.
>
> http://webobjects.mdimension.com/hudson/job/Wonder53/javadoc/er/extensions/eof/ERXGuardedObjectInterface.html
Thanks for the pointer. I see that ERXGenericRecord's implementation ju
On Jan 19, 2010, at 1:47 AM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
Hello,
I was just reading Johan Henselmans's thread entitled "validating
deleting an object with relationship", and it reminded me of a
similar question I had recently: is there a convenient way to ask
EOF if a particular EO _would be_ del
On Jan 19, 2010, at 3:27 AM, David Avendasora wrote:
On Jan 19, 2010, at 5:27 AM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
Hi Cheong Hee,
On 19/01/2010, at 8:49 PM, Cheong Hee (Gmail) wrote:
I relied much on own logic checking than EOF to decide if the
object is allowed to be deleted, apart from delete rule.
Missed to reply to list!
- Forwarded Message
From: Shravan Kumar. M
To: sreenivasul...@evergent.com
Sent: Tue, January 19, 2010 11:34:50 PM
Subject: Re: Frames Session problem..
Use Javascript to call logout in another frame when logout in one frame is
called, that would simply solv
On Jan 18, 2010, at 11:51 PM, Johan Henselmans wrote:
On 19 jan 2010, at 01:54, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jan 18, 2010, at 4:49 PM, Johan Henselmans wrote:
I want to delete an EO object only if some data is not available
in one of its relationships.
Can you not use a delete rule? Deny is w
Yep this is what we do too,
Our apps are much bigger because of it, but the benefits of this are huge.
Robin
2010/1/19 James Cicenia :
> So does that mean...
>
> To select the System Frameworks on my Eclipse deploy switch for the project?
> Basically, embed everything?
> Does this also mean, th
So does that mean...
To select the System Frameworks on my Eclipse deploy switch for the project?
Basically, embed everything?
Does this also mean, that all I have to do is install WOMonitor and never the
Frameworks on a new server?
Or better yet try the new WonderMonitor?
I am still keeping to
Greetings All,
Just a last minute reminder that this month's WO-NoVA meeting for DC area
WebObjects developers will be TONIGHT (Tuesday Jan 19, 2010) at K12's offices
in Herndon, VA. 20171.
RSVP appreciated (greatly) so we can be sure to get sufficient food. Beer/more
food at Ned's afterwa
+100! Yes, the .woa will be bigger but it solve so much problems, not
embedding frameworks is a disaster waiting to happen.
And make sure you're building everything on Java 5, 10.4 don't have
Java 6 so you won't be able to run your app on 10.4 if your classes
are compiled with Java 6 byteco
never just replace frameworks in a production app ... you should rebuild,
retest, redeploy, and you should do it with embedded frameworks.
ms
On Jan 19, 2010, at 9:27 AM, James Cicenia wrote:
> Hello-
>
> I am creating a new app that needs Wonder 5.4 which needs WO 5.4.
> Which is fine with me
Using Wonder? This might be of some help.
http://webobjects.mdimension.com/hudson/job/Wonder53/javadoc/er/extensions/eof/ERXGuardedObjectInterface.html
Ramsey
On Jan 19, 2010, at 4:47 AM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
Hello,
I was just reading Johan Henselmans's thread entitled "validating
deleting
Hello-
I am creating a new app that needs Wonder 5.4 which needs WO 5.4.
Which is fine with me as there seems like a lot of nice things there.
However, I have three mature projects that just run on my various
servers, two Linux and one MacOSXServer 10.4. These were all
developed and deployed with
On Jan 19, 2010, at 5:27 AM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
> Hi Cheong Hee,
>
> On 19/01/2010, at 8:49 PM, Cheong Hee (Gmail) wrote:
>
>> I relied much on own logic checking than EOF to decide if the object is
>> allowed to be deleted, apart from delete rule. One of the reasons is
>> sometimes the obj
Hi All,
My application consists of 2 frames. One is for user login screen, and
other is for application specific. Each frame maintains seperate session
object. When I logout my application only one session is terminating. Other
frame session is remaining itself. I don't know how to track other f
Hi Cheong Hee,
On 19/01/2010, at 8:49 PM, Cheong Hee (Gmail) wrote:
> I relied much on own logic checking than EOF to decide if the object is
> allowed to be deleted, apart from delete rule. One of the reasons is
> sometimes the object itself also depends on its attribute value other than
> d
Hi Paul
Interesting. I always do it at the UI level where "delete" button has a
binding with isDisabled. E.g. User is allow to be deleted if his status is
inactive. In this way, the delete button will be enabled if the logic
return !isDisabled, otherwise the button is disabled. I relied mu
Hello,
I was just reading Johan Henselmans's thread entitled "validating deleting an
object with relationship", and it reminded me of a similar question I had
recently: is there a convenient way to ask EOF if a particular EO _would be_
deletable if I tried to delete it?
I have a component wher
41 matches
Mail list logo
