Hello Steve,
We write SIF agents in Java & J2EE technologies as per our company or client
needs, but I would be interested to write them in WO.
Cheers,
Shravan Kumar. M
---
Fw: SIF and WO
SIF and WO
Tuesday, February 02, 2010 9:02:41 AM
From:
"Steve Peery"
To:
""
I reckon it is a touchy issue. The legal folks might make allowances
for things like archive.org. I would not want this on any server that
I was responsible for unless I had written permission. I'd be happy
to use it from your sever if you want to host it. ;-)
Yours in paranoia,
Chuck
On 03/02/2010, at 8:53 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
>> Isn't copying Apple's, er, copyrighted material a bad idea? It seems like
>> the sort of thing to piss them off. Pissed off lawyers... never a good
>> thing. Trust me on that.
> yes.
> definitely.
> do not copy it.
> whatever you do.
> that is
don't count on it
On Feb 2, 2010, at 5:12 PM, Johnny Miller wrote:
> Do you think Apple would be willing to give you a link on the WebObjects home
> page: http://developer.apple.com/tools/webobjects/?
>
> Nice work Pascal thank you for all your efforts.
>
> Johnny
>
>
>
>
> On Feb 2, 2010,
Do you think Apple would be willing to give you a link on the WebObjects home
page: http://developer.apple.com/tools/webobjects/?
Nice work Pascal thank you for all your efforts.
Johnny
On Feb 2, 2010, at 12:03 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
> I looked at the robots.txt file on developer.apple.co
I looked at the robots.txt file on developer.apple.com and I don't see
any rules that stop bots to fetch anything in /legacy. And I do see
some stuff from the 5.4.2 docs in a Google search, but most of the
time, 3.x and 4.5.x links shows up before the 5.3/5.4 docs. It's all
crap.
Hi!
> Isn't copying Apple's, er, copyrighted material a bad idea? It seems like
> the sort of thing to piss them off. Pissed off lawyers... never a good
> thing. Trust me on that.
yes.
definitely.
do not copy it.
whatever you do.
that is all.
cough.
ms
___
Isn't copying Apple's, er, copyrighted material a bad idea? It seems
like the sort of thing to piss them off. Pissed off lawyers... never
a good thing. Trust me on that.
On Feb 2, 2010, at 1:49 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
don't copy wonder's -- it changes fairly often and seems to have
dec
don't copy wonder's -- it changes fairly often and seems to have decent
coverage on google.
ms
On Feb 2, 2010, at 4:20 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
>
> Le 10-02-02 à 15:52, Mike Schrag a écrit :
>
> Does anyone knows a good index bot in Java (last time I used a bot, it
> was good old ht:
Ok, so I will use good old WebDevil to download the docs :-)
Hi!
YES! 5.3 and 5.4. Since it moved to legacy, Google does not index
it any more... maybe they (apple) have some robots.txt file that
causes that.
Hope they release the new version soon... o :)
Yours
Miguel Arroz
On 2010
Hi!
YES! 5.3 and 5.4. Since it moved to legacy, Google does not index it any
more... maybe they (apple) have some robots.txt file that causes that.
Hope they release the new version soon... o :)
Yours
Miguel Arroz
On 2010/02/02, at 20:52, Mike Schrag wrote:
Does anyone knows a go
Le 10-02-02 à 15:52, Mike Schrag a écrit :
Does anyone knows a good index bot in Java (last time I used a
bot, it was good old ht://dig)? I'm playing with Lucence Nutch
but if somebody have a better alternative, I'm all ears.
just use google site search ... i think it might be free if you
>>> Does anyone knows a good index bot in Java (last time I used a bot, it was
>>> good old ht://dig)? I'm playing with Lucence Nutch but if somebody have a
>>> better alternative, I'm all ears.
>> just use google site search ... i think it might be free if you allow ads?
>
> Tried it, but far f
Le 10-02-02 à 13:21, Amedeo Mantica a écrit :
why not spotlight? ( if your webserver is on osx )
Spotlight Server = pure crap. And I don't think it will index non
local documents...
On 02/feb/2010, at 19.04, Pascal Robert wrote:
Le 10-02-01 à 23:06, Mike Schrag a écrit :
Does anyone
As an aside, this need is related to generating direct action URLs without
a context or request (i.e. within a background thread.) Is it worthwhile
to anyone beside me to have a directActionURLForActionNamed(...) method
that doesn't depend on (ERX)WOContext? I keep running
Don't know. SHA-1 is still safe for certain applications -- I think
dig signatures is fine. But not for authentication.
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Cheong Hee (Gmail) wrote:
> Thanks! Do you think secured email S/MIME should follow the same too, e.g.
> sha256+rsa? I have this email signin
Don't know if this is helpful (it's not what you asked) but I had a
project that needed to tie together a SIF source and a database and
some other things. This was several years ago. SIF was a mess,
datawise, and we concluded pretty quickly that the thing to do was to
set up (like, daily)
On Feb 2, 2010, at 9:58 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
As an aside, this need is related to generating direct action URLs
without a context or request (i.e. within a background thread.)
Is it worthwhile to anyone beside me to have a
directActionURLForActionNamed(...) method that doesn't depend on
Mike Schrag wrote:
As an aside, this need is related to generating direct action URLs without a
context or request (i.e. within a background thread.) Is it worthwhile to
anyone beside me to have a directActionURLForActionNamed(...) method that
doesn't depend on (ERX)WOContext? I keep running
why not spotlight? ( if your webserver is on osx )
On 02/feb/2010, at 19.04, Pascal Robert wrote:
>
> Le 10-02-01 à 23:06, Mike Schrag a écrit :
>
>>> Does anyone knows a good index bot in Java (last time I used a bot, it was
>>> good old ht://dig)? I'm playing with Lucence Nutch but if somebo
Le 10-02-01 à 23:06, Mike Schrag a écrit :
Does anyone knows a good index bot in Java (last time I used a bot,
it was good old ht://dig)? I'm playing with Lucence Nutch but if
somebody have a better alternative, I'm all ears.
just use google site search ... i think it might be free if you
>> As an aside, this need is related to generating direct action URLs without a
>> context or request (i.e. within a background thread.) Is it worthwhile to
>> anyone beside me to have a directActionURLForActionNamed(...) method that
>> doesn't depend on (ERX)WOContext? I keep running into thi
On Feb 2, 2010, at 9:28 AM, Jon Nolan wrote:
Yeah, I figured as much. Thanks Chuck.
As an aside, this need is related to generating direct action URLs
without a context or request (i.e. within a background thread.) Is
it worthwhile to anyone beside me to have a
directActionURLForAction
Is just for debugging and logging purpose, I don't have to patch/override/extend
Amedeo
On 02/feb/2010, at 17.48, Mike Schrag wrote:
>> there is a method for retreiving the active session count and is
>> WOApplication.activeSessionCount()
>>
>> now, is there also a method for retreiving the se
Thanks
On 02/feb/2010, at 17.48, Mike Schrag wrote:
>> there is a method for retreiving the active session count and is
>> WOApplication.activeSessionCount()
>>
>> now, is there also a method for retreiving the session list ( all session
>> ids and eventually their creation timestamp ) ?
>
Yeah, I figured as much. Thanks Chuck.
As an aside, this need is related to generating direct action URLs
without a context or request (i.e. within a background thread.) Is it
worthwhile to anyone beside me to have a
directActionURLForActionNamed(...) method that doesn't depend on
(ERX)WOCo
> there is a method for retreiving the active session count and is
> WOApplication.activeSessionCount()
>
> now, is there also a method for retreiving the session list ( all session ids
> and eventually their creation timestamp ) ?
WOServerSessionStore sessionStore = (WOServerSessionStore)
there is a method for retreiving the active session count and is
WOApplication.activeSessionCount()
now, is there also a method for retreiving the session list ( all session ids
and eventually their creation timestamp ) ?
Thanks
Regards
Amedeo ___
Do
nice job :)
On 01/feb/2010, at 13.35, Pascal Robert wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> wocommunity.org finally have a brand new look! Thanks to the efforts of one
> of our community member, Sophiacom (www.sophiacom.fr). Everything is much
> cleaner now, especially the Screencasts page.
>
> More stu
FYI
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Bernhard Ocklin
> Date: February 2, 2010 10:28:18 AM EST
> To: annou...@lists.mysql.com
> Subject: MySQL Cluster 7.1.1 is there
> return-path:
> original-recipient: rfc822;kieran_li...@mac.com
>
> Dear MySQL Cluster users,
>
> A new version of MySQL Cluste
Le 10-02-01 à 23:08, Chuck Hill a écrit :
On Feb 1, 2010, at 6:27 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
Before I'm putting the final touches on the organization and member
profiles on wocommunity.org, I would like to know what people would
like to put in those profiles. So I added two pages in the wik
Hi all,
I called a javascript function when a ajaxsubmit button is clicked.But it is
not working fine
My java script function is as followed