Yeah, that's exactly what I'm working on implementing. I was just wondering if
anyone else had already done it in a nice CSS/Ajaxy way so I could get a jump
start.
I'm trying to put it together in such a way that it is generic enough that it
would work for anyone so it can be easily dropped in
Hello everyone,
Just the vast majority of the community is using Wonder, we are releasing the
Getting Started with Project Wonder recording from WOWODC 2011 for free. It's a
really good intro to Wonder and to properties management. Many thanks to Kieran
for this!
Also, you will find a
Thank you Pascal, they will be very useful, especially the Wonder one.
Antonio
On 12 November 2010 11:23, Pascal Robert prob...@macti.ca wrote:
Hello everyone,
Just the vast majority of the community is using Wonder, we are releasing
the Getting Started with Project Wonder recording from
Hey David,
I made you this while waiting for Maven to download internet.jar.
https://bitbucket.org/hugi/uswebobjects/changeset/ae9d5e3c675e
The .html is just bare bones, though - you'll have to add your own css.
Enjoy,
- hugi
On 12.11.2010, at 11:18, David Avendasora wrote:
Yeah, that's
The question is more that I don't understand why people wants to rewrite WO
when you can simply extend it.
I think the problem is obviously more political than technical. Technically
you are correct in that WebObjects is extensible with or without PW.
Seconded. I'm currently working at a
You rock Hugi!
This is way more complete than I had come up with so far! Next on my list is to
D2Wify it for ERModernLook integration.
Oh, and if Maven hasn't finished with internet.jar, I'd like a Pony also.
Not for me, of course, but for David LeBer. He really wants one.
Dave
On Nov 12,
You're welcome :). Note that the URL was for a changeset so make sure you fetch
the most recent version, I made a couple of improvements.
And here's your pony.
.,,.
,;;*,
.-'``;-');;.
/' .-. /*;;
.'\d\;; .;;;,
/ o `\;,__.
Good news everyone!
http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2010/11/12openjdk.html
Oracle and Apple® today announced the OpenJDK project for Mac OS® X. Apple will
contribute most of the key components, tools and technology required for a Java
SE 7 implementation on Mac OS X, including a 32-bit and
Anfang der weitergeleiteten E-Mail:
Von: Pascal Robert prob...@macti.ca
Datum: 12. November 2010 15:23:34 MEZ
An: macenterpr...@lists.psu.edu
Betreff: Oracle and Apple Announce OpenJDK Project for Mac OS X
Antwort an: Mac OS X enterprise deployment project
macenterpr...@lists.psu.edu
Good news everyone!
inline: 2437167239_3a2d9470b5_m.jpg ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
Larry and Steve are good friends, after all...
Apple give up on the server business, so it will not compete with Oracle
(even if it wasn't that big competitor) and at the
same time, probably, fill up its new data center with Oracle kits. Oracle
need backing for the OpenJDK, especially in view
of
And thus all the hissy-fits and panic all over the internet and mailing lists
was both amusing and a complete waste of energy!
OK, back to work everyone .. java is alive and well on OS X ;-)
On Nov 12, 2010, at 9:51 AM, Antonio Petri wrote:
Larry and Steve are good friends, after all...
But what about WO? :) (Ducks for cover...)
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 6:56 AM, Kieran Kelleher kelleh...@gmail.com wrote:
And thus all the hissy-fits and panic all over the internet and mailing
lists was both amusing and a complete waste of energy!
OK, back to work everyone .. java is alive
Maybe, Oracle will pick WO up as well?
On 12 November 2010 14:59, Joe Little jmlit...@gmail.com wrote:
But what about WO? :) (Ducks for cover...)
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 6:56 AM, Kieran Kelleher kelleh...@gmail.com
wrote:
And thus all the hissy-fits and panic all over the internet and
I just wrote Steve...
I hear he responds these days. Hope I sent it to the correct address?!
James
On Nov 12, 2010, at 8:59 AM, Joe Little wrote:
But what about WO? :) (Ducks for cover...)
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 6:56 AM, Kieran Kelleher kelleh...@gmail.com wrote:
And thus all the
Antonio Petri wrote:
Maybe, Oracle will pick WO up as well?
I hope not. Their m.o. with open sun products has been to make them
commercial (see Sun Grid Engine).
--
Valerio Luccio (212) 998-8736
Center for Brain Imaging4 Washington Place, Room 156
New York
Le 2010-11-12 à 10:15, Valerio Luccio a écrit :
Antonio Petri wrote:
Maybe, Oracle will pick WO up as well?
I hope not. Their m.o. with open sun products has been to make them
commercial (see Sun Grid Engine).
They can't do worse than what they did with Oracle Media Objects :-)
Hi!
For those of you scratching their heads...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bedrock_(framework)
I didn't know that one! :) But Think C was nice, and CodeWarrior was awesome!
:) I still have both at home, some of my graduation projects were made using
CodeWarrior. Then, OS X showed up. :)
Le 2010-11-12 à 11:10, Miguel Arroz a écrit :
Hi!
For those of you scratching their heads...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bedrock_(framework)
I didn't know that one! :) But Think C was nice, and CodeWarrior was
awesome! :) I still have both at home, some of my graduation projects
+1
I followed the croud and moved to C++ at that time, but still I don't see
the reason... Object Pascal was so good,
Borland themselves adopted the Object Pascal model, diverting from their
Turbo Pascal, for Delphi.
No doubt Delphi is still well alive.
On 12 November 2010 16:16, Pascal Robert
Yes, we were all waiting for the unifying framework, the write once,
compile everywhere solution to the
cross platform development. BedRock died because Apple dropped it to work on
OpenDoc. Even MacApp
was slowly being ported to window, until it was completely axed because, I
think, Cocoa was
Hi!
On 2010/11/12, at 16:16, Pascal Robert wrote:
THINK Pascal all the way! And not because of the name...
WaitNextEvent(WOWODC 2011)
MoreHandles(); MoreHandles(); MoreHandles();
Regards,
Miguel Arroz
___
Do not post admin requests to the
Le 2010-11-12 à 11:23, Antonio Petri a écrit :
Yes, we were all waiting for the unifying framework, the write once, compile
everywhere solution to the
cross platform development. BedRock died because Apple dropped it to work on
OpenDoc. Even MacApp
was slowly being ported to window, until
On Nov 5, 2010, at 12:46 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Nov 5, 2010, at 12:40 PM, Johnny Miller wrote:
What do you guys think (if anything) will happen to OSX Server?
It seems to me that if there is no X-Serve there is much less purpose for OS
X Server edition.
That is probably next
Huh?
On Nov 12, 2010, at 12:47 PM, Ray Kiddy r...@ganymede.org wrote:
They literally had no idea of what to do as an investment with it.
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list
No XServe, No Cry.
On Nov 12, 2010, at 11:47 AM, Ray Kiddy wrote:
On Nov 5, 2010, at 12:46 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Nov 5, 2010, at 12:40 PM, Johnny Miller wrote:
What do you guys think (if anything) will happen to OSX Server?
It seems to me that if there is no X-Serve there is much
On Nov 12, 2010, at 4:50 AM, Hugi Thordarson wrote:
I honestly don't see what Apple gains by forbidding me and my coworkers to
use WO.
The question at this point is what would they gain by allowing it?
--
Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development
Practical WebObjects -
I honestly don't see what Apple gains by forbidding me and my coworkers to
use WO.
The question at this point is what would they gain by allowing it?
ME!
;)
- hugi ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev
On 2010-11-12, at 10:39 AM, Hugi Thordarson wrote:
I honestly don't see what Apple gains by forbidding me and my coworkers to
use WO.
The question at this point is what would they gain by allowing it?
ME!
I'll write Steve on behalf of the world.
:-)
;)
- hugi
On 2010-11-12, at 1:33 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Nov 12, 2010, at 4:50 AM, Hugi Thordarson wrote:
I honestly don't see what Apple gains by forbidding me and my coworkers to
use WO.
The question at this point is what would they gain by allowing it?
Does Apple really care? Yes I know
Le 2010-11-12 à 13:58, David LeBer a écrit :
On 2010-11-12, at 1:33 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Nov 12, 2010, at 4:50 AM, Hugi Thordarson wrote:
I honestly don't see what Apple gains by forbidding me and my coworkers to
use WO.
The question at this point is what would they gain by
On Nov 12, 2010, at 1:58 PM, David LeBer wrote:
On 2010-11-12, at 1:33 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Nov 12, 2010, at 4:50 AM, Hugi Thordarson wrote:
I honestly don't see what Apple gains by forbidding me and my
coworkers to use WO.
The question at this point is what would they gain by
Don't forget that tools don't work as well if you're not on a Mac. Rule editor
is non-existent.
-Mike
On Nov 12, 2010, at 2:01 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
Le 2010-11-12 à 13:58, David LeBer a écrit :
On 2010-11-12, at 1:33 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Nov 12, 2010, at 4:50 AM, Hugi
Does this mean Java Client apps are safe now?
-Mike
On Nov 12, 2010, at 9:59 AM, Joe Little wrote:
But what about WO? :) (Ducks for cover...)
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 6:56 AM, Kieran Kelleher kelleh...@gmail.com wrote:
And thus all the hissy-fits and panic all over the internet and mailing
Java Client ?!
Did you just say Java Client??
That's crazy talk. :-)
Dave
On Nov 12, 2010, at 2:09 PM, Michael Gargano wrote:
Does this mean Java Client apps are safe now?
-Mike
On Nov 12, 2010, at 9:59 AM, Joe Little wrote:
But what about WO? :) (Ducks for cover...)
On Fri, Nov
I'm sure it will make some people happy in France :-)
Java Client ?!
Did you just say Java Client??
That's crazy talk. :-)
Dave
On Nov 12, 2010, at 2:09 PM, Michael Gargano wrote:
Does this mean Java Client apps are safe now?
-Mike
On Nov 12, 2010, at 9:59 AM, Joe Little
On Nov 11, 2010, at 5:08 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
Le 2010-11-11 à 19:12, Chuck Hill a écrit :
On Nov 11, 2010, at 4:05 AM, Pascal Robert wrote:
I have a question that I kept to myself for months, but let's go public.
People talks about moving away from WO or even writing WO/EOF
Le 2010-11-12 à 15:05, Chuck Hill a écrit :
On Nov 11, 2010, at 5:08 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
Le 2010-11-11 à 19:12, Chuck Hill a écrit :
On Nov 11, 2010, at 4:05 AM, Pascal Robert wrote:
I have a question that I kept to myself for months, but let's go public.
People talks about moving
Greetings all,
October's WO-NoVA meeting is scheduled for NEXT THURSDAY! (Thursday, November
18, 2010) at 6:30 PM at K12
Dave A will do a complete and exhaustive presentation on all aspects of
WebObjects and all its related technologies. Or not. I suppose I should have
asked him first. If
Does this mean Java Client apps are safe now?
surely mike's just teasing mr avendasora...?
:-)
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update
Just a reminder : don't forget to vote and add your ideas on Google Moderator :
http://www.google.com/moderator/#16/e=352e3
It's not only for ideas for the wiki or wocommunity.org, if you wish to have
something in Wonder or elsewhere, you can share your idea over there.
--
Pascal
I want food, so I'm RSVPing.
As far as my presentation goes... I'll be covering all that and I thought I
would also do an exhaustive review of Ruby on Rails and compare and contrast it
to WonderObjects.
Or not.
Dave
On Nov 12, 2010, at 3:46 PM, Andrew R. Kinnie wrote:
Greetings all,
Hi there,
if someone of you uses XServes please help us:
http://www.xserve-petition.com
Thank you!
__
Dipl.-Inf.(FH) Matthias Jakob
Entwickler
Takwa GmbH
Friedrich-List-Str. 36
99096 Erfurt
Tel.: +49 361 6534096
Fax.: +49 361 6534097
eMail:
I've heard rumors of WO developers using pink netbooks! (^_~)
The Apple rules were written to avoid such horrors.
You all appear to have missed the clauses covering stylish hair,
personal jets and a playboy lifestyle that are essential parts of the
Apple developer contract. (*)
Mark
(*) That
44 matches
Mail list logo
