Thanks Chuck to your quick reaction,
So the Only solution is to use my StoredProcedure which return data. The
storedProcedures is declared in my model A. So how to call it and cast data
like student and bind it to WODisplayGroup for my batch view?
I have seven parameters with IN and one with OU
One thing that looks suspicious to me is that the AMD and the data it is
updating are both in the same form. Can you move the AMD outside of the AUC
_and_ the form and add a different form inside the AMD?
I have not used an AAC or an AOF in an AMD before. Gee, it is fun to talk in
code!
Chu
Ted,
I've tried that combination (and many others) before. Some were close.
Some were ... not so close. I just tried it again and here is what I
found. I reloaded the page for each test.
Assuming that I have selected an item in the AAC and then entered data
in the details text area and it
--
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 14:02:04 -0400
> From: Roger Perryman
> Subject: Re: Clarification on AjaxObserveField and
> AjaxUpdateContainer
> Interaction
> To: Theodore Petrosky
> Cc: webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com
> Message-ID: <12ce8601-01a0-4821
On May 10, 2011, at 10:41 AM, Dov Rosenberg wrote:
> ... the lawyers (who all used PCs of course).
So there IS justice in this world!
--
Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development
Come to WOWODC this July for unparalleled WO learning opportunities and real
peer to peer problem
Netstruxr was a dot-com - the start of WOnder was to opensource our codebase
and frameworks to basically save the code because the company was doomed.
That was like, ten years ago now -
On May 10, 2011, at 1:41 PM, Dov Rosenberg wrote:
> That is basically a BSD license which is good. Who is N
That is basically a BSD license which is good. Who is NetStruxr? There is
no other reference to that group anywhere else I could find. It appears to
be a group that no longer exists. There should be a license at the top
level of the source tree, this implies that the license covers the entire
code
I think this is something that EOF can't do: qualify across schemas (databases
in EOF's view).
Chuck
On May 10, 2011, at 4:49 AM, naneon.raym...@neuf.fr wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have 2 models using different schema of a database. but these schemas have
> table which have relationship. So in my
On May 10, 2011, at 9:43 AM, Klaus Berkling wrote:
>
> On May 8, 2011, at 8:11 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the reply. Late Friday, we tracked it down (we think!) to a bad
>> build of Apache 2.0 or (more likely) of mod_webobjects.We rolled back to
>> Apache 1.3 and the stock Sol
On May 8, 2011, at 8:11 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
> Thanks for the reply. Late Friday, we tracked it down (we think!) to a bad
> build of Apache 2.0 or (more likely) of mod_webobjects.We rolled back to
> Apache 1.3 and the stock Solaris adaptor from Apple (uh, yeah, WO 5.2). The
> problem no
Greetings Dov,
>From what I am told, either a standards body, company, or community can serve
>in that regards. There are some ideas to engage any of those kinds of groups
>to ensure that some WO components may be protected.
The lawyers will for certain have a field day.
Later,
Dan Beatty, AB
On May 10, 2011, at 1:18 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
> On 2011-05-09, at 5:09 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
>> Le 2011-05-09 à 18:43, Chuck Hill a écrit :
>> On May 9, 2011, at 3:37 PM, Daniel Beatty wrote:
>>>
Greetings Pascal,
Both a general and specific set of topics would be nice. Like for
>>> For the fun of it, this is the list of potentials topics:
>>>
>>> • HTML routing
>>> • Automatic vs manual
>>> • Linking between pages
>>> (ERXRouteUrlUtils/ERXRouteLink/ERXRouteURL)
>>> • Offline access/cache
>>
>> Interesting, but not really on my l
Le 2011-05-10 à 10:22, David Avendasora a écrit :
>
> On May 9, 2011, at 8:15 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
>
>>
>> Le 2011-05-09 à 18:37, Daniel Beatty a écrit :
>>
>>> Greetings Pascal,
>>> Both a general and specific set of topics would be nice. Like for
>>> example, last year's talk you gav
On 2011-05-10, at 10:22 AM, David Avendasora wrote:
>
> On May 9, 2011, at 8:15 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
>
>>
>> Le 2011-05-09 à 18:37, Daniel Beatty a écrit :
>>
>>> Greetings Pascal,
>>> Both a general and specific set of topics would be nice. Like for
>>> example, last year's talk you g
On May 9, 2011, at 8:15 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
>
> Le 2011-05-09 à 18:37, Daniel Beatty a écrit :
>
>> Greetings Pascal,
>> Both a general and specific set of topics would be nice. Like for example,
>> last year's talk you gave proved very useful.Strengths and limitations
>> of REST m
>>> I might be the only one, but I like to have some control of my machine, and
>>> really see no point in those scripts.
>>> Just tell what version and package of eclipse to install (classic, Java,
>>> whatever) and list the plugin sites.
>>> We are talking to *developers*... about using a com
On May 10, 2011, at 12:05 PM, Michael Schrag wrote:
>
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On May 10, 2011, at 6:47 AM, Henrique Gomes wrote:
>
>> It's always good to minimize confusion, I'm all for it.
>>
>> On May 9, 2011, at 11:00 AM, Pascal Robert wrote:
>>
>>> Ok, so we have four pages in the wi
Hi all,
I have 2 models using different schema of a database. but these schemas have
table which have relationship. So in my model "A", I use a fetch spec. on a
table which have the maximum relation with tables in model "A" and "B".
So when I excute my fech spec, WO don't see the schema of model
It's always good to minimize confusion, I'm all for it.
On May 9, 2011, at 11:00 AM, Pascal Robert wrote:
> Ok, so we have four pages in the wiki that tells how to configure Apache for
> development, and numerous pages on how to install WOLips and the core WO
> frameworks. We need one or two pa
20 matches
Mail list logo
