Hi Daniel,
If you just want the date, and not the time, then JodaTime is probably better
for you to use. Search the list archives for details.
The problem with Java timestamps is that they are very accurate and include
things like Daylight Saving time and historical changes in time. This is g
Hi there,
I need help with a problem with the Date type.
The problem happens when I type de date 1920-dec-31in a field defined as date
in a edit page of Modern D2W application. After saving the page the date is
displayed as 1920-dec-30. The same happens for all the years before 1921, but
for y
On May 13, 2011, at 1:09 PM, David Avendasora wrote:
>
> On May 13, 2011, at 2:49 PM, John Huss wrote:
>
>> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 1:38 PM, David Avendasora
>> wrote:
My new strategy combines still doing some setup, but the setup is
explicitly for making things easier to read.
>>>
Not to poke holes but...
On May 13, 2011, at 9:21 AM, David Avendasora wrote:
>
> EOQualifier haveRedHair = Student.HAIR_COLOR.eq(MyAppConstants.RED_HAIR);
Why is that an EOQualifier?
public ERXKeyValueQualifier eq(T value) {
return ERXQ.equals(_key, value);
}
a
On May 13, 2011, at 2:49 PM, John Huss wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 1:38 PM, David Avendasora
> wrote:
>>> My new strategy combines still doing some setup, but the setup is
>>> explicitly for making things easier to read.
>>>
>>> EOQualifier haveRedHair = Student.HAIR_COLOR.eq(MyAppConsta
On May 13, 2011, at 3:21 PM, Tim Worman wrote:
> On May 13, 2011, at 7:09 AM, David Avendasora wrote:
>
>>
>> On May 13, 2011, at 4:39 AM, naneon.raym...@neuf.fr wrote:
>>
>>> I always stay in the corner because I know I need advice on WO
>>
>> Don't stay in the corner! :-)
>>
>> This is th
On May 13, 2011, at 7:09 AM, David Avendasora wrote:
>
> On May 13, 2011, at 4:39 AM, naneon.raym...@neuf.fr wrote:
>
>> I always stay in the corner because I know I need advice on WO
>
> Don't stay in the corner! :-)
>
> This is the place for help with WebObjects. Everyone here remembers wha
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 1:38 PM, David Avendasora wrote:
> My new strategy combines still doing some setup, but the setup is
> explicitly for making things easier to read.
>
> EOQualifier haveRedHair = Student.HAIR_COLOR.eq(MyAppConstants.RED_HAIR);
> EOQualifier areActive = Student.IS_ACTIVE.isT
On May 13, 2011, at 1:33 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
> Hi A David,
>
>
> On May 13, 2011, at 9:21 AM, David Avendasora wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've been doing a lot of work with EOQualifiers in the past few months,
>
> Congratulations, that must feel very satisfying!
Oddly, you know, it does.
On May 13, 2011, at 12:32 PM, Ramsey Gurley wrote:
>
> On May 13, 2011, at 9:21 AM, David Avendasora wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've been doing a lot of work with EOQualifiers in the past few months, and
>> while the new ERXKey-based, chainable qualifiers are a huge leap ahead of
>> the stand
Hi A David,
On May 13, 2011, at 9:21 AM, David Avendasora wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been doing a lot of work with EOQualifiers in the past few months,
Congratulations, that must feel very satisfying!
> and while the new ERXKey-based, chainable qualifiers are a huge leap ahead of
> the stand
Apache is the most friendly and modern license
Dov
From: Klaus Berkling mailto:kberkl...@dyned.com>>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 10:28:39 -0700
To: WebObjects Development
mailto:webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com>>
Subject: Re: Making code available & license (was Re: Examles from apple
webobjects 5.4.3
Thanks everyone for your comments. I'm leaning towards Apache but need to think
about it some more.
kib
"Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that
counts."
Winston Churchill
Klaus Berkling
Web Application Dev. & Systems Analyst
DynEd International, Inc.
www
Yeah, that's true, me too. I actually have used the Houdah one more - it's
called ExistsInRelationshipQualifier
If you're not up for fixing Wonder's, you could try that one.
John
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
> On May 12, 2011, at 11:49 AM, Alexis Tual wrote:
>
> Le 12
There is only one object per EO per editing context. The arrays below only
contain references to that one, true EO. They don't contain the actual EO and
EOQualifier.filteredArrayWithQualifier is not copying EOs, it is copying
references (i.e. pointers).
Chuck
On May 13, 2011, at 2:40 AM, Ne
On May 13, 2011, at 1:39 AM, naneon.raym...@neuf.fr wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My problem is solved thanks to your advice and examples. attached the code:
>
>
> EOQualifier qualMailType =
> EOQualifier.qualifierWithQualifierFormat(
> "indEmails.emailTypec=%
On May 12, 2011, at 11:49 AM, Alexis Tual wrote:
> Le 12 mai 2011 à 19:33, Fred Wells a écrit :
>
>> Almost but the SQL that get generated isn't right, any one know a way around
>> this error?
>>
>> EvaluateExpression failed:
>> > DISTINCT t0.actualEndDate, t0.actualStartDate, t0.approvalOutput
I'm trying to use JProfiler 5.1.4 with my WO application.
I added the support in Eclipse (I said I have eclipse 3.4 but in fact I have
Eclipse 3.6.2)
I added the WOLips JProfiler Launcher plugin in Eclipse.
The only way working for me is to launch the application like this: right click
the Appl
On May 13, 2011, at 9:21 AM, David Avendasora wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been doing a lot of work with EOQualifiers in the past few months, and
> while the new ERXKey-based, chainable qualifiers are a huge leap ahead of the
> standard EOQualifiers in terms of readability and clarity, they have
first we have a method called "dot()" and now we have "that()"
personally, I've decided to code all my queries as a standard Jeopardy question.
On May 13, 2011, at 12:21 PM, David Avendasora wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been doing a lot of work with EOQualifiers in the past few months, and
> w
Hi all,
I've been doing a lot of work with EOQualifiers in the past few months, and
while the new ERXKey-based, chainable qualifiers are a huge leap ahead of the
standard EOQualifiers in terms of readability and clarity, they have always
seemed just short of ideal. I believe I've come up with a
It sounds like you're marking the tickets as 'selected' on the ticket object.
If that is the case, the array's hold a pointer to the original object and that
information is shared between them all.
Ramsey
On May 13, 2011, at 2:40 AM, Neil MacLennan wrote:
> public NSArray tickets;
> public NSA
Hello everyone,
For those who want to see the WOWODC 2011 schedule to book their hotel and
flight, you can get it from a iCalendar file:
http://wocommunity.org/wowodc11/WOWODC11-Schedule.ics
About early-bird pricing, it ends on May 16 at 11:30pm (EST), so you still have
4 days to get up to $
On May 13, 2011, at 4:39 AM, naneon.raym...@neuf.fr wrote:
> I always stay in the corner because I know I need advice on WO
Don't stay in the corner! :-)
This is the place for help with WebObjects. Everyone here remembers what it's
like to be new to WO and trying to figure out the fundamental
There's a simple way if you have a A ->> B, to fetch all the A's having no B's :
EOQualifier qual = ERXQ.isNull(A.TO_BS_KEY + "." + B.ID_KEY);
Beware, the to-many relationship must be of type "Left Outer" in your model
Hope it helps.
Alex
Le 11 mai 2011 à 23:29, Fred Wells a écrit :
> Hey all
public NSArray tickets;
public NSArray tickets_weekend;
public NSArray tickets_day;
public NSArray tickets_evening;
tickets = Product.fetchAllTicketProducts(ec);
EOKeyValueQualifier qual1 = new EOKeyValueQualifier(Product.CATEGORY_KEY,
EOQualifier.QualifierOperatorEqual, "WEEKEND
Hi,
My problem is solved thanks to your advice and examples. attached the code:
EOQualifier qualMailType =
EOQualifier.qualifierWithQualifierFormat(
"indEmails.emailTypec=%@", argsEtu);
EOQualifier admQ = new
EOKeyValueQualifi
27 matches
Mail list logo
