Re: WOWODC 2011 code

2011-07-25 Thread Jesse Tayler
are these links all listed on a wiki page somewhere? On Jul 24, 2011, at 4:26 PM, Pascal Robert wrote: I don't think we actually send a list of available code from WOWODC 2011, so let's do it: ERSync (sync framework on top of ERRest):

Re: WOWODC 2011 code

2011-07-25 Thread Pascal Robert
It's nowhere right now, but I'm not stopping anyone to put it on the community wiki :-) are these links all listed on a wiki page somewhere? On Jul 24, 2011, at 4:26 PM, Pascal Robert wrote: I don't think we actually send a list of available code from WOWODC 2011, so let's do it:

Re: WOWODC 2011 code

2011-07-25 Thread Jesse Tayler
HA! well, I'm keen to organize examples and modern practices so that it's easier to focus on the latest stuff amongst quite some years of great foundations and legacy stuff. not sure I know enough of where best to put this, but given some guidance, Id be glad to help out on that, I hate to

Re: WOWODC 2011 code

2011-07-25 Thread Pascal Robert
Le 2011-07-25 à 11:35, Jesse Tayler a écrit : HA! well, I'm keen to organize examples and modern practices so that it's easier to focus on the latest stuff amongst quite some years of great foundations and legacy stuff. not sure I know enough of where best to put this, but given some

Re: Lion and WO

2011-07-25 Thread Tim Worman
The only problem I had was that I had to use Direct Connect in Lion - probably a config problem somewhere. I'm stuck in Snow Leopard for dev right now since my current database doesn't install in Lion. Tim Worman UCLA GSEIS On Jul 20, 2011, at 10:08 AM, Mike Schrag wrote: yes, long ago ..

Re: Lion and WO

2011-07-25 Thread Ramsey Gurley
Postgresql? On Jul 25, 2011, at 11:38 AM, Tim Worman wrote: The only problem I had was that I had to use Direct Connect in Lion - probably a config problem somewhere. I'm stuck in Snow Leopard for dev right now since my current database doesn't install in Lion. Tim Worman UCLA GSEIS

Re: Lion and WO

2011-07-25 Thread Andy 'Dru' Satori
PostgreSQL is just fine in lion Andy 'Dru' Satori - all typos courtesy of fat finger and an iPad On Jul 25, 2011, at 7:15 PM, Ramsey Gurley rgur...@smarthealth.com wrote: Postgresql? On Jul 25, 2011, at 11:38 AM, Tim Worman wrote: The only problem I had was that I had to use Direct

Re: Lion and WO

2011-07-25 Thread Tim Worman
No, I've been using Openbase for a long time. I'm probably going to have to make a move though since there seems to be very little activity around the product. There's a tweet mentioning a beta release for Lion: http://twitter.com/#!/OpenBase/statuses/90781766431936512 Tim Worman UCLA GSEIS

RE: Lion and WO

2011-07-25 Thread Beatty, Daniel D CIV NAVAIR, 474300D
Greetings Tim, But I like Frontbase and OpenBase. They are really cool database that have the simplicity of just being a SQL-92 database without any non-sense. This is going to force us into the mindless collective PHP dictated databases. Later, Dan -Original Message- From:

Changes to podcasts

2011-07-25 Thread Pascal Robert
I'm re-encoding all the podcasts on wocommunity.org so that they take less space (up to 70% less!), so you might found that your download doesn't complete if I change the file while you download it. If it's the case, just restart the download. I'm currently doing the WOWODC 2010 recordings, and

Re: Lion and WO

2011-07-25 Thread Andy 'Dru' Satori
MySQL is really the only platform that fits this description. I have worked with pretty much every RDMS over the last 20 years, and none fit the PHP conformity description other than MySQL. OpenBase has more association with WO and EoF than any other, and for the most part is the only RDBMS

Re: Lion and WO

2011-07-25 Thread Tim Worman
Openbase has been a great product from day one. And integrating it with WO definitely is seamless. I'm a fan. But the developer list has fallen completely silent and it used to be vibrant. The product hasn't had any public updates since 2009 - I don't think it is because there is nothing to do.

Re: Lion and WO

2011-07-25 Thread John Huss
I don't know what I would do if I was using some proprietary technology that hadn't been updated in years, with almost no communication from the company in charge of it! What is that like? ;-) On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 10:22 PM, Tim Worman li...@thetimmy.com wrote: Openbase has been a great

Re: Lion and WO

2011-07-25 Thread Chuck Hill
ROFLAMO! On 2011-07-25, at 8:36 PM, John Huss wrote: I don't know what I would do if I was using some proprietary technology that hadn't been updated in years, with almost no communication from the company in charge of it! What is that like? ;-) On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 10:22 PM, Tim

Re: Lion and WO

2011-07-25 Thread Tim Worman
Now that right there IS funny. But if no one were on the list to see that and laugh, then I'd have to develop in something other than WO. :-) Tim Worman UCLA GSEIS On Jul 25, 2011, at 8:36 PM, John Huss wrote: I don't know what I would do if I was using some proprietary technology that

Re: Lion and WO

2011-07-25 Thread Chuck Hill
FrontBase is pretty quiet these days too, though the dev list does see some traffic and there are new releases. Marketing a proprietary SQL database these days is swimming upstream, you can't expect wide success. FrontBase fills a niche market, of which WO is probably less and less every