I have a single component that acts as a table row. The outer-most object in
the component is a AUC where the elementName is "tr". I also have css that is
supposed to style each of these rows sth like:
.resultsTable tbody tr:nth-child(odd) td{background-color:#EE;}
The entire enclosing page
On 2013-02-19, at 4:57 PM, Johnny Miller wrote:
> Oh. No I am not doing that. But isn't that done by WODynamicGroup?
Not that magically matches custom code that you wrote. :-) WO is good, but
not THAT good.
>
> How would that look? Like this?
>
>public void takeValuesFromReques
Success. I basically did what is below for both takeValuesFromRequest
invokeAction (looked at original and just added the check to see if it was a
splitviewsection) and it now works.
Thanks yet again! I'll make a version of this for the MooTools framework.
It's pretty cool if you like splitv
Oh. No I am not doing that. But isn't that done by WODynamicGroup?
How would that look? Like this?
public void takeValuesFromRequest(WORequest aRequest, WOContext aContext)
{
if(hasChildrenElements())
{
int count = _children.count();
aContext
Do you also adjust the element ID in takeValues and invokeAction? Things need
to match up in all three phases.
Chuck
On 2013-02-19, at 4:31 PM, Johnny Miller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've hit another snag on a new dynamic element. I'm trying to build a split
> view.
>
> I would like the componen
Hi,
I've hit another snag on a new dynamic element. I'm trying to build a split
view.
I would like the components to look like this:
// whatever
// whatever
I'm at the point where I've got it properly creating the javascrip
3.8 is fine.
> Fine with me - I'm happy where I am. Is 3.8 also not recommended?
>
> Tim
>
> On Feb 19, 2013, at 1:21 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
>
>>
>> Le 2013-02-19 à 16:15, Tim Worman a écrit :
>>
>>> Is Eclipse/WOLips 4.2 recommended now?
>>
>> It's not.
>>
>>> On another note, can we u
Fine with me - I'm happy where I am. Is 3.8 also not recommended?
Tim
On Feb 19, 2013, at 1:21 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
>
> Le 2013-02-19 à 16:15, Tim Worman a écrit :
>
>> Is Eclipse/WOLips 4.2 recommended now?
>
> It's not.
>
>> On another note, can we update golipse. I was looking at it
Le 2013-02-19 à 16:15, Tim Worman a écrit :
> Is Eclipse/WOLips 4.2 recommended now?
It's not.
> On another note, can we update golipse. I was looking at it and it shouldn't
> be too hard. I'm happy to give it a go.
>
> Tim
> UCLA GSE&IS
>
> On Feb 19, 2013, at 12:52 PM, Lars Sonchocky-Hell
Is Eclipse/WOLips 4.2 recommended now? On another note, can we update golipse.
I was looking at it and it shouldn't be too hard. I'm happy to give it a go.
Tim
UCLA GSE&IS
On Feb 19, 2013, at 12:52 PM, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
wrote:
> Thanks for the hint, I was actually wondering about the WO
That page should be deleted. The real one is here:
http://wiki.wocommunity.org/display/documentation/Project+Wonder+Installation
> Thanks for the hint, I was actually wondering about the WOLips37Stable in the
> URL I had. I found it here
> http://wiki.wocommunity.org/display/WOL/Install+WOLips+
Thanks for the hint, I was actually wondering about the WOLips37Stable in the
URL I had. I found it here
http://wiki.wocommunity.org/display/WOL/Install+WOLips+with+Eclipse+Update+Manager
, it was the first hit on Google. When I now look at that page it displays the
correct information. Maybe I
12 matches
Mail list logo
