Hi, All
A new guy has come on the team here at work and will be helping on our WO
projects. woohoo! How are things these days on a Windows machine with WOLips
and Project Wonder? Does he have to get a Mac or does everything run just as
smooth?
Calven
___
hardy dee har har. :)
> On Apr 22, 2015, at 9:43 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
>
> Avoid spaces in the path to the project or workspace. :-)
> Not sure other than that.
>
>
>
> On 2015-04-22, 6:41 AM, "Calven Eggert" wrote:
>
> Hi, All
>
> A new guy has come on the team here at work and will be he
Avoid spaces in the path to the project or workspace. :-)
Not sure other than that.
On 2015-04-22, 6:41 AM, "Calven Eggert" wrote:
Hi, All
A new guy has come on the team here at work and will be helping on our WO
projects. woohoo! How are things these days on a Windows machine with WOLips
+1 for spaces !
I've been using it on Windows for a few weeks, it worked quite well.
I have switched to linux because,well, I prefer =D... But one of my colleagues
still works on Windows with it, it works well.
On Wed, 2015-04-22 at 13:43 +, Chuck Hill wrote:
Avoid spaces in the
Good to know thanks!
What operating system on Windows/Linux are you using and which version of
Eclipse did you install?
Also, which install instructions did you follow?
I found this one: (Preparation for building WOLips on Windows operating systems
(NT 5.0 and higher))
https://wiki.wocommun
You're welcome.
I occasionally use Windows 7 (dual boot) and Ubuntu 14.10, I'll try Ubuntu
15.04 in a fews days (it will be released tomorrow).
For Eclipse, I use Luna (version 4.4.1) with WOLips 4.4.0 (I built it myself,
following this https://github.com/wocommunity/wolips).
Actually I have fo
I was planning a Framework which has an EOModel that two different apps will
use. Is there a potential of conflicts when each app tries to create a record
and save to db?
Specifically if app1 creates an EOEnterprise Object and modifies it and does
not save and at the same time app2 creates an E
Hi Gino,
Everything is completely independent.
No conflict.
That’s actually why you create frameworks;)
Xavier
> On 22 avr. 2015, at 19:17, Gino Pacitti wrote:
>
> I was planning a Framework which has an EOModel that two different apps will
> use. Is there a potential of conflicts when each
Ah Ok.. so even if 10 apps use the same Framework every EOObject is completely
safe and no conflicts for PKs…
Great...
> On 22 Apr 2015, at 18:36, Dev WO wrote:
>
> Hi Gino,
>
> Everything is completely independent.
> No conflict.
> That’s actually why you create frameworks;)
>
> Xavier
>
>
Assuming you have a specific db for each app of course. If not, the objects are
still all independent, but you’ll have to deal with data
freshness/communication between the 2 apps as they would access the same
storage.
Xavier
> On 22 avr. 2015, at 19:42, Gino Pacitti wrote:
>
> Ah Ok.. so ev
Well if the Framework EOModel is tied to a single DB and set of tables then all
the Apps would be using the same data source. Obviously the Apps would have
different stacks and freshness would be an issue… but I was more concerned with
two records for the same DB and table being created and save
EOF will take care of your primary keys/insertion without conflict.
Despite the fact that you won’t have conflict, I don’t really understand why
you would need 2 apps to write to the same db the same kind of object. I just
don’t get it, but maybe it’s clear for you:)
Xavier
> On 22 avr. 2015,
Ok, thanks for the clarification…
Well if the Framework uses a single DB in the connection dictionary then it
seems to me that the pattern dictates that writing a record would be to a
single db and to a particular table.
Or am I missing something really fundamental?
I’m just trying to normalis
You’re missing something:)
Your framework doesn’t need to be tied to a specific db (not even a specific db
vendor).
You usually left the settings/connection to the app itself through some Wonder
properties:
#dbConnectURLGLOBAL=
#dbConnectUserGLOBAL=
#dbConnectPasswordGLOBAL=
etc
When you create a
Ah… duh!!!
So leaving the connection dictionary and setting it in your app is much more
generic… :-)
That is what you mean - right?
> On 22 Apr 2015, at 19:23, Dev WO wrote:
>
> You’re missing something:)
> Your framework doesn’t need to be tied to a specific db (not even a specific
>
not only more generic, if you create a framework it is for code-reuse purpose.
The actual execution of the software is done by the app, so the app is the part
that need to have the relevant settings for it to run.
Let’s illustrate that for a second:
-you create a framework for managing customer
Super… I was not looking at it from that point of view… thanks for the
clarification!
> On 22 Apr 2015, at 20:04, Dev WO wrote:
>
> not only more generic, if you create a framework it is for code-reuse
> purpose. The actual execution of the software is done by the app, so the app
> is th
Hi Gino,
On 2015-04-22, 10:56 AM, "Gino Pacitti" wrote:
Well if the Framework EOModel is tied to a single DB and set of tables then all
the Apps would be using the same data source. Obviously the Apps would have
different stacks and freshness would be an issue... but I was more concerned
with
And thanks Chuck… Its a client with multiple apps and I was just trying to
normalise things…
Now I have a much better point of view for planning future actions…
:-)
> On 22 Apr 2015, at 20:10, Gino Pacitti wrote:
>
> Super… I was not looking at it from that point of view… thanks for the
> clar
An opportunity for WO devs:
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00UBYDXXQ/ref=nosim/0sil8
via:
http://kottke.org/15/04/amazons-goat-grazing-services or
kib
"The era of procrastination, of half-measures, of soothing and baffling
expedients, of delays, is coming to its clos
Ooooh. Me! Me! Me!
Chuck
On 2015-04-22, 12:14 PM, "Klaus Berkling" wrote:
An opportunity for WO devs:
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00UBYDXXQ/ref=nosim/0sil8
via:
http://kottke.org/15/04/amazons-goat-grazing-services or
kib
"The era of procrastination, of half-measures, of
I was silly and clicked!!!
No providers available
This service is not supported in your area at this time. We are continually
expanding our coverage and hope to be able to serve your area soon.
I guess there are no goats in Manhattan. Lots of GTOs but no goats.
On Apr 22, 2015, at 3:14 PM,
I really don't understand what's going on here. learningthewonders.com and
several other domains reside on the very same Mac mini behind the same IP. The
same Mac mini also provides authoritative DNS for this and other domains. And
it acts as mail server (so I can receive your mails). I'll have
No issues here:
; <<>> DiG 9.8.3-P1 <<>> learningthewonders.com
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 46104
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;learningthewonders.com.IN
One last question though and hopefully I have understood the previous comments…
If the framework has an empty connection dictionary and it is set via the
Properties file of the App using it i.e..
dbConnectURLGLOBAL=
dbConnectUserGLOBAL=
dbConnectPasswordGLOBAL=
What happens if you also include
Hi Gino,
On 23 Apr 2015, at 6:36 am, Gino Pacitti wrote:
> One last question though and hopefully I have understood the previous
> comments…
>
> If the framework has an empty connection dictionary and it is set via the
> Properties file of the App using it i.e..
> dbConnectURLGLOBAL=
> dbCon
Yes it works for Mysql with :
.URL = jdbc:mysql:
< your_model_name >.DBUser =
< your_model_name >.DBPassword =
< your_model_name >.DBPlugin = MySQL
< your_model_name >.DBDriver = org.gjt.mm.mysql.Driver
.URL = jdbc:mysql:
< your_othermodel_name >.DBUser =
< your_othermodel_name >.DBPassword
27 matches
Mail list logo
