Hello again list. Two new WO positions available in Australia, separate from
the job posting I posted on April 13.
We have two full time developer positions available immediately, primarily
focused on WebObjects development. The positions are full time permanent, on
premise in Melbourne, Aust
The Viking Tradition lives on!
From: David LeBer
mailto:dleber_wo...@codeferous.com>>
Date: Tuesday, May 3, 2016 at 4:20 PM
To: Chuck Hill mailto:ch...@gevityinc.com>>
Cc: WebObjects-Dev
mailto:webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com>>
Subject: Re: WebObjects officially declared dead by Apple
Yeah, I w
Yeah, I was surprised by that too.
Apple rarely gives definitive statements on anything, let alone a long dead and
forgotten product ;)
--
D
On May 3, 2016 at 7:11:05 PM, Chuck Hill (ch...@gevityinc.com) wrote:
I am surprised that Hugi got a clear statement from Apple. That must have taken
s
I am surprised that Hugi got a clear statement from Apple. That must have
taken some persistence! “Frank, this damn Hugi guy keeps bugging us every
year, get rid of him!”
:-)
On 2016-05-03, 4:04 PM,
"webobjects-dev-bounces+chill=gevityinc@lists.apple.com on behalf of Pascal
Robert"
> Le 3 mai 2016 à 12:47, Flavio Donadio a écrit :
>
> Hugi,
>
>
> That’s bad news, but it’s exactly what we expected, in a certain way. The
> silence and lack of updates for such a long time were telling us the truth,
> although we wouldn’t accept it — there had to be a final word, straight
Craig was the EOF manager back in the day.
Now that WO is officially abandoned by Apple, the questions for me are:
What is the logical conclusion of pushing WOnder beyond WebObjects? What does
that mean in the end? Will we always have to carry around the
legacy WO frameworks? When does the o
> On May 3, 2016, at 10:31 AM, Ricardo Parada wrote:
>
> I Wonder if Craig Federighi has any love for WebObjects in his heart. I mean
> he was very involved with EOF and WebObjects. Perhaps a Swifty WebObjects
> for Linux in the distant future using Swift 4's property behaviors to
> implemen
I Wonder if Craig Federighi has any love for WebObjects in his heart. I mean he
was very involved with EOF and WebObjects. Perhaps a Swifty WebObjects for
Linux in the distant future using Swift 4's property behaviors to implement
object/array faults.
:-)
> On May 3, 2016, at 1:13 PM, Hugi
I think it’s good news—at least much better than the
kind-of-certain-but-not-really uncertainty we’ve had for the past decade or so.
And I don’t think we should be holding our breath waiting for Apple to open
source WO. As awesome as that would be, though :).
- hugi
> On 3. maí 2016, at 16:4
Hugi,
That’s bad news, but it’s exactly what we expected, in a certain way. The
silence and lack of updates for such a long time were telling us the truth,
although we wouldn’t accept it — there had to be a final word, straight from
the horse’s mouth! I guess we have it now.
So, they say WO i
Well…. never say never!!! ;-)
> On 3 May 2016, at 16:19, Hugi Thordarson wrote:
>
> Hi all.
>
> We probably all know that WO's been practically dead to Apple for a long
> time, but unfortunately Apple has refused to state so officially (at least I
> don't recall there being an official state
Hi all.
We probably all know that WO's been practically dead to Apple for a long time,
but unfortunately Apple has refused to state so officially (at least I don't
recall there being an official statement).
Anyhow… In the past years I've regularly sent letters to Tim Cook, asking about
the sta
Hi all,
I would like the functionality of a WOActiveImage but don’t wish to have a full
submit. I end up reloading the whole page. Each click adds a coordinate and I
manually add a letter to a static PNG to show injections of botulinum toxin
treatment but on each click the page scrolls.
I saw
13 matches
Mail list logo
