No. If one wanted to write a clean-room implementation of WebObjects'
APIs, that is exactly what the decision in 2014 spoke to. So, for those
of us in the US, that decision said we could not implement something
which implemented the APIs.
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/05/oracles-java
I think a clean-room implementation was probably always defendable,
however, no one that I know is doing that. Looking at de-compiled source
isn’t “clean”. :P
-Lon
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Ray Kiddy wrote:
>
> Well, Google just won their case against Oracle. I am not a lawyer, nor do
>
Well, Google just won their case against Oracle. I am not a lawyer, nor
do I play one on TV, but I think that this means a clean-room
re-implementation is legally doable. Just saying.
- ray
On 5/3/16 8:19 AM, Hugi Thordarson wrote:
Hi all.
We probably all know that WO's been practically d
