I think a clean-room implementation was probably always defendable, however, no one that I know is doing that. Looking at de-compiled source isn’t “clean”. :P
-Lon On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Ray Kiddy <[email protected]> wrote: > > Well, Google just won their case against Oracle. I am not a lawyer, nor do > I play one on TV, but I think that this means a clean-room > re-implementation is legally doable. Just saying. > > - ray > > On 5/3/16 8:19 AM, Hugi Thordarson wrote: > >> Hi all. >> >> We probably all know that WO's been practically dead to Apple for a long >> time, but unfortunately Apple has refused to state so officially (at least >> I don't recall there being an official statement). >> >> >> <snip> > _______________________________________________ > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. > Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > > https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/lon.varscsak%40gmail.com > > This email sent to [email protected]
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
