I think there was a discussion but nothing was set up. I would be willing to
donate as well.
Michael
> On Jun 29, 2020, at 8:27 PM, Theodore Petrosky via Webobjects-dev
> wrote:
>
> is there a gofundme or other crowd source set up so I can donated to update
> WOLips?
>
> It’s been talked
is there a gofundme or other crowd source set up so I can donated to update
WOLips?
It’s been talked about, but I haven’t seen anything. I would donate!!!
Ted
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing lis
Don,
> On 29 Jun 2020, at 17:16, Don Lindsay wrote:
> Thanks for the information. This may be the path I will need to go down for
> this specific project.
Good luck!
I have checked our sources and actually there were two small gotcha's we did
bump into:
(i) programmatically added attribut
Seems “normal” in the sense that it is trying to connect but it cannot.
Creating an OSC makes a cursor to the DB which usually ends up being a file on
disk and can run into ulimits. At some point, maybe, resources will be
relinquished so it keeps waiting.
You can:
1) Find out if your cursors
Thanks for the information. This may be the path I will need to go down for
this specific project.
Thanks
Don
> On Jun 29, 2020, at 07:14, OCsite wrote:
>
> Don,
>
> we do something remotely similar all the time (not creating a complete model,
> but adding attributes dynamically at laun
If other things depend on that OSC, then disposing it would be bad.
If it is an OSC you made to do work in a long running task and then disposed at
the end of that task, it would be good to dispose it… or… to keep it in an OSC
pool and check it back into that pool. They aren’t cheap.
AARON ROSE
Oh, and there's one related question.
It seems to me particularly weird that if sockets caused by the stale OSCs
exceed the ulimit, the threads which use these sockets hang. Is that the normal
and presumed behaviour? I would expect myself an exception thrown instead, or
something like that. Nev
Aaron,
thanks, this I hope I sort of understand.
Still, in the garbage-collected environment, any object, far as I can say,
should
(a) be automatically disposed when there's no explicit reference to it,
regardless of whether it is cheap or big;
(b) if there's some internal means to keep unrefe
OSC is a cursor to the DB. They aren’t particularly cheap to acquire. As far as
I know, they live until you dispose of them. They don’t automatically dispose.
They are not cheap like an editingContext. One OSC can service a plethora of
editingContexts. Simple WOApps have two OSC for the life of
Hi there,
it seems finally I succeeded to find the culprit of the problem described
below. Far as my testing shows, it seems an ObjectStoreCoordinator is never
garbage collected (presumed it has been used at least once for a fetch). Since
the OSC opens a socket to the database, this leads to th
Don,
we do something remotely similar all the time (not creating a complete model,
but adding attributes dynamically at launch to entities). Works without a
glitch, I cannot recall any problem at all with this.
Should work for you as well, I would be rather surprised if you encounter any
probl
11 matches
Mail list logo