Yeah, I switched to the command-line about a year ago and haven't
looked back. However, if you do use Subclipse, make sure you open
Preferences, go to Team->SVN and click on "SVNKit (Pure Java)" instead
of "JavaHL (JNI)." I found that with JavaHL if you do a commit across
multiple Eclipse
Although perhaps not the simplest, IMHO the most powerful, flexible, fastest
and best-documented XML Java framework is JiBX
(http://jibx.sourceforge.net/). Give it a look.
Bruce
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Andrew Lindesay
Sent: Saturd
Markus, this Steve Quirk guy is a dangerous lunatic, so don't listen to him.
It's perfectly OK to use WOBuilder.
Bruce
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Steve Quirk
Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2007 1:25 PM
To: Markus
Cc: webobjects-dev@lists.a
I've done a fair amount of AJAX w/ lesser web frameworks (Spring Web, blech)
but haven't had the opportunity to do much w/ WO yet. Given that Project
Wonder already supports Prototype, I guess I'd use that, but on previous
project I found Dojo to be pretty good. I've also heard good things about
The bash in SF was pretty nice. My only complaint is that when I drove down
from Cupertino, the police had closed the 4th street exit, so I ended up
arriving a half hour later than I would've because I had to drive over the
Bay Bridge and then drive around Oakland trying to find my way back. But
I also prefer EOF and Cayenne to Hibernate, but I've had to use Hibernate on
a project and it's usable. It's not great, and certain things like the
criteria api are completely broken to the point of uselessness, but as open
sources projects go I've seen much worse. I think the use of annotations
As a typically lazy developer, one of the things I miss the most from the
Objective-C version of WebObjects was the ability to very quickly write and
refine pages with WebScript, and just sit there hitting reload until I got
the code right. Much, much faster than the
code-compile-launch-test-stop-
I have no idea one way or the other, but even if you could use Xcode for
WebObjects, why would you want to? Xcode is a great IDE for Objective-C and
COCOA. For anything Java, including WebObjects, Eclipse (despite its many
headaches and shortcomings) blows it away. Some people also use IDEA for
I've only just begun to play around with it and so far I'm very impressed
and excited about it. I don't understand about half of it, so it must be
really good ;-). A good place to start for those who are curious is:
http://www.artima.com/scalazine/articles/steps.html
Bruce
___
I've picked pieces out of Dojo and used them sucessfully. Some parts of it
seem good, while others seem to just be thrown in there, and the
documentation is still extremely poor. OTOH, the fact that IBM is backing
it is appealing as it seems to have some momentum and will presumably get
better.
Whatever you do, don't learn JSP aka the evil spawn of Cthulu. Besides
being complete garbage technically, it's pretty much been deprecated by Sun
in favor of JSF. If, for whatever reason, you decide that you want to use
an open source web framework, consider Tapestry or Wicket, or if you want
so
Hell yes. I'd love to see it.
Thanks,
Bruce
--- Q <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been playing with groovy a little bit over
> the last few days
> and I am surprised that I haven't seen much talk of
> using it with
> webobjects.
>
> I found an old (abandoned?) project on
> sourceforg
12 matches
Mail list logo
