Hey Lachlan,
Thanks for the reply.
On May 9, 2008, at 11:37 AM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
I am maintaining an application that hasn't had a lot of
development for the past 18 months or so. I recently discovered a
form submission is failing (stack trace below).
I don't know how long this has bee
Hello All,
I am maintaining an application that hasn't had a lot of development
for the past 18 months or so. I recently discovered a form submission
is failing (stack trace below).
I don't know how long this has been happening but it certainly worked
at some time.
The system is running
launching script - certainly
don't want to do that by hand each time.
Have you noticed anything else regarding 5.3 on Linux? Any changes in
performance or stability? Am I crazy to even consider trying this?
Again, thanks for taking the time.
Hunter
On Sep 1, 2006, at 9:46 PM, Joe
Howdy,
We have a couple of apps that we have running on a Linux server (Red
Hat Enterprise 4) with mod_webobjects and wotaskd, running on 5.2.4.
This works pretty okay, though sometimes we have little problems with
wotaskd and Monitor, although those are not relevant to this
discussion. A
I know, it's retarded. We're under the same NDA that conference goers
are as Select members.
WTF?
On Aug 11, 2006, at 10:55 AM, Kieran Kelleher wrote:
The suspense is killing me :-? (er, how about a Select Member
pre-announcement on connect.apple.com?!)
-Kieran
___
Let me be the first to say THANK YOU.
This is great.
On Jul 3, 2006, at 8:30 PM, Travis Cripps wrote:
A number of people have expressed interest in using the WebObjects
adaptor with Apache 2.2.x. I finally gotten a chance to sit down
and work on it today. I'm writing to let you know that
on of the web server for the
adaptor, if that's ok. You can always route it to a second instance of
Apache with modproxy or the like that is 64bit. The long way around
the problem.
On 7/2/06, Hunter Hillegas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All,
I am attempting to use the Project Wonder
All,
I am attempting to use the Project Wonder Apache 2 adaptor with
Apache 2.2 on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4, running on AMD 64.
Based on Apache doco, it seems like little has changed in regards to
modules between 2.0 and 2.2 but unfortunately I cannot get the
adaptor to compile.
I am
We have excellent success with PostgreSQL and WebObjects.
It is much more 'Oracle-like' than MySQL, supporting many of the same
features (tablespaces, etc...).
It has great JDBC support and works like a charm.
On Dec 15, 2005, at 9:20 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
Hi David,
On Dec 15, 2005, at 2:
I've used MS SQL Reporting Services extensively.
It is very good at building reports if your data exists in SQL Server
and pretty much in the state you want it reported on.
WO is a powerful set of frameworks used to design robust
applications. Reporting Services can only do a very small sli
Jump in and give it a go.
It's really pretty easy to get a handle on. The standard Lucene docs
cover most common scenarios.
On Dec 2, 2005, at 3:52 PM, Jonathan Miller wrote:
That was my guestimate but I'm not familiar w/ that tool ~
Do you know of any "Practical" examples of using Lucene
I don't know how it compares to MySQL but our PostgreSQL 8.0 database
has no trouble servicing millions of requests per month from our
WebObjects application.
Most of the queries are SELECTs, not INSERTs, FYI.
On Nov 27, 2005, at 10:18 AM, Peteris Krisjanis wrote:
Do PostgreSQL goes well w
I upgraded my Tiger machine to XCode 2.2/WO5.3.1.
I am having a problem that I have had after past upgrades and
unfortunately I cannot remember how I solved it.
Basically, hitting Build and Run in XCode pops open Safari but
instead of opening the app, I get the 'No Instance Available'.
I
This was officially released today.
XCode 2.2 includes WO5.3.1.
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=302797
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
He
I should have mentioned that the configuration below serves about 4
million pages a month to about 750,000 unique users. The site is busy
and the setup never breaks a sweat.
On Nov 8, 2005, at 7:57 PM, Hunter Hillegas wrote:
We deploy using Monitor on RHEL 3.
Apache 2 w/ PostgreSQL 8.1
We deploy using Monitor on RHEL 3.
Apache 2 w/ PostgreSQL 8.1. WO 5.2.4.
Works like a charm - it just runs and runs.
On Nov 8, 2005, at 8:39 AM, James Cicenia wrote:
Hello -
I have been requested/ordered to deploy on Linux. So, what is my
best approach?
Currently, our site has been humming
I don't know who 'all of us' are and I never mentioned that phrase
anywhere in my message. In the context of my message, 'us' means my
company, the only folks I can speak for.
If you check the list archives you'll see some mentions of servlet
deployment using a WAR breaking with projects th
t;turning on" because the support is just not there. Use
Project Wonder and the ERXPatcher or wait for the next release.
Am 02.11.2005 um 20:12 schrieb Hunter Hillegas:
Yes, the 5.3 release notes claim XHTML support.
I have not been able to figure out how to turn it on. It still
genera
Yes, the 5.3 release notes claim XHTML support.
I have not been able to figure out how to turn it on. It still
generates unclosed image tags, among others. Bummer.
WOImage should generate , not src="blah.jpg">.
Oh well.
On Nov 2, 2005, at 2:02 AM, Amedeo Mantica wrote:
Hi, remember that w
19 matches
Mail list logo
