Advice on upgrading to Leopard/WO5.4/Eclipse3.3

2007-12-06 Thread Joshua Archer
Hey all, If there is a FAQ page on this, please forgive my post and send me the link out of the thread. I've been using Eclipse 3.2 / WO 5.3 on tiger for my production code for a while now, afraid to dive in to the new code base because of what I had been perceiving on the list traffic as

Re: Slogan

2007-11-07 Thread Joshua Archer
Since we're just having fun here... 1) WO is Me 2) Tell me your tales of WO 3) WebObjects puts the WO in WOnder On Nov 7, 2007, at 3:17 PM, David Marioni wrote: WebObjects ? I WOAnt it ! I WOant it ! I WO-Ant it ! David On Nov 7, 2007, at 9:37 PM, James Cicenia wrote: Yo Love Wo -j-

Re: irc channel

2007-06-18 Thread Joshua Archer
what's the suggested irc client for os x? On Jun 18, 2007, at 2:49 PM, David Holt wrote: It's unbelievable how much you're missing already :-) heh heh (evil laughter) d -- It's like driving a car at night. You never see further than your headlights, but you can make the whole trip that w

Eclipse 3.2.2 + Leopord?

2007-06-12 Thread Joshua Archer
Has anyone been successful in running Eclipse 3.2.2 under the Leopard beta? I'm having problems running, as it's complaining it can't write out a config file. I've checked permissions, even tried on a different user w/ Eclipse in a different location. Here's the log: !SESSION 2007-06-12 18

Re: WOBuilder in the future of WO?

2007-01-26 Thread Joshua Archer
This is an excellent idea. On Jan 26, 2007, at 4:44 AM, Ken Anderson wrote: Maybe we should start a fund? I think before we do that though, we should lay out specifically what features are necessary to take the pot. On Jan 25, 2007, at 10:30 PM, Andrew Satori wrote: Actually, the voting

Re: WebObjects 5.3 Licensing Question (Again)

2007-01-23 Thread Joshua Archer
Deployment of 5.3 is free and legal on any platform, using the developer key found inside of the webobjects foundation framework. I'm not certain why everyone's so squirrelly about giving straight answers on this one, but that's perhaps just part of the general Apple corporate culture. I've

Re: WOLips modeler trouble

2006-09-01 Thread Joshua Archer
Hello Richard, As far as developing on Windows through Apple software, it's never been pretty. However, using Eclipse + WOLips, there is a pathway that will be up to date with current WebObjects frameworks. As for deploying, I am part of a fairly large WebObject project that deploys 5.3 c

Re: WebObjects Foundation

2006-08-14 Thread Joshua Archer
Sounds great, count me in. On Aug 14, 2006, at 10:44 PM, Pascal Robert wrote: Ok, let's start talking about a WebObjects Foundation (or Alliance, or whatever). Why do we need such a thing ? The Foundation will be responsible to market WO, collecting money to help speed up the developme

Re: General List Disclosure of WWDC WO info

2006-08-12 Thread Joshua Archer
I've been down this road myself -- that link is for 5.2 and older. 5.3 has explicit wording that allows deployment on any platform. On Aug 11, 2006, at 12:25 PM, Zak Burke wrote: Karl wrote on 8/11/06 2:11 PM: If you read the detailed license, any WO 5.3.x onwards application is licensed for

OFF TOPIC: WebObjects developer short-term contract position available for work on open source project

2006-07-31 Thread Joshua Archer
Begin forwarded message:From: Joshua Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: July 31, 2006 2:27:59 PM PDTTo: WebObjects List <webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com>Subject: OFF TOPIC: WebObjects developer short-term contract position available for work on open source project Hello everyone,I a

Re: WWDC WO Meet Up List

2006-07-25 Thread Joshua Archer
I won't actually be attending WWDC, but I can stick a nametag on :) On Jul 25, 2006, at 1:26 PM, Ken Anderson wrote: I would like to request that everyone wear their WWDC badges at The Thirsty Bear so that we can figure out who everyone is! Ken On Jul 12, 2006, at 2:14 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:

Re: WWDC Security concern

2006-07-18 Thread Joshua Archer
It's not that bad --it really depends on where you come from and what your comfort level is for hookers and street people. That area gets patrolled pretty regularly, it's well lit, and it has lots of people walking around. I wouldn't be concerned. The worst that is likely to happen to you i