Hi Jon
We currently deploy on Tomcat. A bit of a challenge at times.
This may or may not help you.
We have an Apache Tomcat server (for the apps) and a separate Apache
web server (for static content).
I subclass WOResourceManager and override the method:
public String urlForResourceNamed(
is it possible that the application server can see the protected
variables at runtime in XCode and Tomcat but not in Eclipse?
Any insight would be appreciated.
--
Regards,
Peter Newnam
Senior Analyst Programmer
University of Wollongong
___
Do not post
So how is it possible that the application server can see the
> protected variables at runtime in XCode and Tomcat but not in Eclipse?
> Any insight would be appreciated.
Are you using packages in Eclipse and no packages in Xcode?
ms
doh !! Good catch !! I did not spot the difference !
the
database connection? The application will only ever be deployed in a Tomcat
container.
Any use cases where the one would be a strong favourite over the other?
Many thanks.
Regards,
Peter Newnam
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They
d requests) using its own internal pooling mechanism?
Thank you.
Regards,
Peter Newnam
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Su
>
> > I think there was some talk here weeks ago (and something I had
> > wondered about a while back) about using an object store coordinator
> > pool. I think Mike brought it up -- Mike?
> I don't recall this particular discussion (but then I talk a lot :) ), but >
> Wonder does have ERXObjectS
ables I can see them and entities are generated but no
attributes/fields are generated for the entities.
As a work around I have created views for the tables but hopefully
there is a property or flag I can set to see all accessible tables?
Regards,
Peter N
eated views for the tables but hopefully
there is a property or flag I can set to see all accessible tables?
Regards,
Peter Newnam
whOracle?
http://support.apple.com/kb/TA26829?viewlocale=en_US
Chuck
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They wi
how to set these when using WOLips. But they
are used by the Oracle Plugin which is used by WOLips. Ask on the
WOLips list if you can't figure it out.
Chuck
On Mar 5, 2009, at 9:48 PM, Peter Newnam wrote:
Aaah - I found that reference but did not realize WOLips used the
same propertie
I used to use DB2 on AS400s :-( - GUI interfaces (of cause now there
are really cool GUI interfaces to the AS400) just makes things seem so
easy !!
On 09/03/2009, at 1:39 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Mar 8, 2009, at 4:01 PM, Peter Newnam wrote:
Thx Chuck. That worked a treat!
File to
Hi All
We have some slow SQL (40 instances of code in an 8 hour period taking
between 5 and 10 seconds to run). Obviously the SQL needs to be
tuned, indexes need to be added etc. The result is that pages start
timing out when user numbers increase ( > 30 users on a single Tomcat
machine
On 09/04/2009, at 11:14 AM, Guido Neitzer wrote:
On 8. Apr. 2009, at 17:04 , Chuck Hill wrote:
At the moment each page access writes to the database as a page
access log - so the connection is heavy used for updates/inserts.
So . what do you thing the best practice would be to improve
per
On 09/04/2009, at 10:04 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
Hi Peter,
On Apr 8, 2009, at 3:40 PM, Peter Newnam wrote:
Hi All
We have some slow SQL (40 instances of code in an 8 hour period
taking between 5 and 10 seconds to run).
While slow 40 times in 8 hours should not be the end of the world.
I&#
On 09/04/2009, at 9:15 AM, Q wrote:
On 09/04/2009, at 8:40 AM, Peter Newnam wrote:
Hi All
We have some slow SQL (40 instances of code in an 8 hour period
taking between 5 and 10 seconds to run). Obviously the SQL needs to
be tuned, indexes need to be added etc. The result is that pages
On 09/04/2009, at 12:50 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Apr 8, 2009, at 7:41 PM, Peter Newnam wrote:
On 09/04/2009, at 10:04 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
Hi Peter,
On Apr 8, 2009, at 3:40 PM, Peter Newnam wrote:
Hi All
We have some slow SQL (40 instances of code in an 8 hour period
taking between 5
-Quickstart
Thanks David ! Google sometimes makes one lazy. I should bookmark
more.
David
On 8-Apr-09, at 7:41 PM, Peter Newnam wrote:
Good point. This link is great - http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Programming:WebObjects/Project_WONDER/Quickstart
- I would think no update
On 10/04/2009, at 1:48 AM, Guido Neitzer wrote:
On 8. Apr. 2009, at 22:16 , Peter Newnam wrote:
Choke! 2 - 5 seconds on average?!!? That is orders of magnitude
too
slow! The bad news is that something is seriously wrong there (or
you
are deployed on an iPhone ;-). The good news is that
17 matches
Mail list logo
