Hi Pierre,
interesting project you have there. Does it have a name?
On 14. Jun. 2007, at 1:56, Pierre Bernard wrote:
For Java I use Eclipse. Wish they had decent (Mac like) text
editing: double-click, tripple click, bindings, ...
For double/triple click see here:
Hi Pierre
Can't wait until the summer :) anyway to see usable code before?
Not to say taht Wonder is not the biggest thing in a WO life today, but
anything new is a good news.
Cheers,
Christian
-- message original --
Sujet: [ANN] Tying my hands...
De: Pierre Bernard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date
original --
Sujet:[ANN] Tying my hands...
De: Pierre Bernard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 13.06.2007 02:52
Just so I feel a bit more of a commitment and to lay out some of a
schedule...
I have plans that are very likely to come through (backpedaling :-) )
The plan
is a good news.
Cheers,
Christian
-- message original --
Sujet: [ANN] Tying my hands...
De: Pierre Bernard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 13.06.2007 02:52
Just so I feel a bit more of a commitment and to lay out some of a
schedule...
I have plans that are very likely to come through
On 13.06.2007, at 14:13, Paolo Sommaruga wrote:
I hope it works in a Xcode too
Xcode development for WebObjects is dead. Get over it. Don't expect
ANY new development to work with it. It's history. Out of the game.
Nada. Apple said that a year ago.
cug
On 07-06-13, at 14:25, Guido Neitzer wrote:
On 13.06.2007, at 14:13, Paolo Sommaruga wrote:
I hope it works in a Xcode too
Xcode development for WebObjects is dead. Get over it. Don't expect
ANY new development to work with it. It's history. Out of the game.
Nada. Apple said that a
at
http://lists.apple.com/archives/webobjects-dev/2006/Aug/msg01144.html
one can read
Apple's strategy is to make WebObjects the best server-side runtime
environment we can by:
- Improving performance, manageability, and standards compliance
- Making WO work well with ANT and the most
On 13.06.2007, at 14:52, Paolo Sommaruga wrote:
including Xcode doesn't mean that Xcode development for
WebObjects is dead. The announce claims only the future lack of the
WO developer tools based on Java bridge
Oh yes. That means you can use Xcode as your Java editor without ANY
useful
to see usable code before?
Not to say taht Wonder is not the biggest thing in a WO life
today, but anything new is a good news.
Cheers,
Christian
-- message original --
Sujet: [ANN] Tying my hands...
De: Pierre Bernard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 13.06.2007 02:52
Just so I feel a bit
is a good news.
Cheers,
Christian
-- message original --
Sujet: [ANN] Tying my hands...
De: Pierre Bernard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 13.06.2007 02:52
Just so I feel a bit more of a commitment and to lay out some of a
schedule...
I have plans that are very likely to come through
-bindings.
Bruce
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paolo Sommaruga
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 5:53 PM
To: Guido Neitzer
Cc: WebObjects-Dev Dev
Subject: Re: [ANN] Tying my hands...
at
http://lists.apple.com/archives/webobjects-dev
Just so I feel a bit more of a commitment and to lay out some of a
schedule...
I have plans that are very likely to come through (backpedaling :-) )
The plan is to release a WebObjects open source project later this
summer.
This will be no project WOnder. Yet it will be quite a big
12 matches
Mail list logo
