Hi Ramsey,
Am 13.03.2012 um 18:20 schrieb Ramsey Gurley:
> On Mar 13, 2012, at 5:53 AM, Fabian Peters wrote:
>
>> Hi Ramsey,
>>
>> Am 13.03.2012 um 01:49 schrieb Ramsey Gurley:
>>
>>> On Mar 12, 2012, at 4:21 PM, Fabian Peters wrote:
>>>
Hi Ramsey,
>> swallowed in ERD2WPage sin
On Mar 13, 2012, at 5:53 AM, Fabian Peters wrote:
> Hi Ramsey,
>
> Am 13.03.2012 um 01:49 schrieb Ramsey Gurley:
>
>> On Mar 12, 2012, at 4:21 PM, Fabian Peters wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Ramsey,
>>>
> swallowed in ERD2WPage since d2wContext().propertyKey() is null. Setting
> the propertyKey f
Hi Ramsey,
Am 13.03.2012 um 01:49 schrieb Ramsey Gurley:
> On Mar 12, 2012, at 4:21 PM, Fabian Peters wrote:
>
>> Hi Ramsey,
>>
swallowed in ERD2WPage since d2wContext().propertyKey() is null. Setting
the propertyKey from the exception resolves this:
if (d2wCont
On Mar 12, 2012, at 4:21 PM, Fabian Peters wrote:
> Hi Ramsey,
>
>>> swallowed in ERD2WPage since d2wContext().propertyKey() is null. Setting
>>> the propertyKey from the exception resolves this:
>>>
>>> if (d2wContext().propertyKey() == null && erv.propertyKey() !=
>>> null) {
>>
Hi Ramsey,
>> swallowed in ERD2WPage since d2wContext().propertyKey() is null. Setting the
>> propertyKey from the exception resolves this:
>>
>> if (d2wContext().propertyKey() == null && erv.propertyKey() !=
>> null) {
>> d2wContext().setPropertyKey(erv.propertyKe
On Mar 12, 2012, at 1:00 PM, Fabian Peters wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to handle validation of a mandatory to-one relationship using
> modern look. The relationship has to be set on a tab of a wizard creation
> page and I want to show an error right away instead of when the user has
> reac
Hi all,
I'm trying to handle validation of a mandatory to-one relationship using modern
look. The relationship has to be set on a tab of a wizard creation page and I
want to show an error right away instead of when the user has reached the final
page and validateForSave is getting called.
I'm
On Aug 26, 2011, at 2:05 AM, David Avendasora wrote:
> Hey D2Wers,
>
> So, I have business logic that executes in the setter of one of my attributes.
In the setter? Any reason why you don't use validate() or maybe
validateFor*()? I've learned the hard way that business logic in a setter is a
Hey D2Wers,
So, I have business logic that executes in the setter of one of my attributes.
It's checking to make sure that at least one of a set of objects has a flag
set. If you try to remove the flag off the last object it should not allow it
and throw and exception.
All that works just fine
