Yes, sure, we'll do that.
On Jun 6, 2007, at 12:47 PM, Anjo Krank wrote:
You can contrib the pool if you want? Sth like: get first from pool
(taking languages into account), do stuff, check in. If none is in
pool, create new.
Cheers, Anjo
Am 06.06.2007 um 09:39 schrieb Denis Frolov:
Addi
You can contrib the pool if you want? Sth like: get first from pool
(taking languages into account), do stuff, check in. If none is in
pool, create new.
Cheers, Anjo
Am 06.06.2007 um 09:39 schrieb Denis Frolov:
Adding it to app.createSessionForRequest() is left to the user,
you may need t
On Jun 5, 2007, at 11:09 PM, Anjo Krank wrote:
Another idea is using one common session for all the spiders. It
should be pretty easy to add a method to Browser object like
"isRobot()" which checks user agent against a known list of
spiders and use this method to feed one session to all
Am 03.06.2007 um 10:29 schrieb Denis Frolov:
Another idea is using one common session for all the spiders. It
should be pretty easy to add a method to Browser object like
"isRobot()" which checks user agent against a known list of spiders
and use this method to feed one session to all the
On 05.06.2007, at 05:47, Pascal Robert wrote:
It's just me, or every WO developer seems to have developed a
CMS ? I can't count how many people has said that they have a
custom CMS done with WO :-)
I guess it is a very common thing for WO developers to develop a
CMS ... ;-) It's my third
On Jun 5, 2007, at 6:57 AM, Sigurður E. Vilhelmsson wrote:
2007/6/5, Pascal Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
It's just me, or every WO developer seems to have developed a CMS ?
I can't count how many people has said that they have a custom CMS
done with WO :-)
I've also noticed that. It would be
2007/6/5, Pascal Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
It's just me, or every WO developer seems to have developed a CMS ?
I can't count how many people has said that they have a custom CMS
done with WO :-) ___
I've also noticed that. It would be great to have
Le 07-06-04 à 09:44, Guido Neitzer a écrit :
On 03.06.2007, at 23:56, Denis Frolov wrote:
Well, in our case we need to create sessions because we want to
use D2W for everything since it makes development easier, allows
larger portions of Wonder code being reused, and makes code base
more
On 03.06.2007, at 23:56, Denis Frolov wrote:
Well, in our case we need to create sessions because we want to use
D2W for everything since it makes development easier, allows larger
portions of Wonder code being reused, and makes code base more
manageable (rules, pages, delegates, factories
On Jun 3, 2007, at 8:38 PM, Guido Neitzer wrote:
Yep, even at that time I was aware of these things but you can't
really lower the session timeout to under 10 Minutes - only if
you're using DAs and create a session if you need one but don't
loose the page. But the application wasn't written
On 03.06.2007, at 02:29, Denis Frolov wrote:
We don't do any special handling of search spiders requests. The
point is that you should be anyway ready for peaks in user
generated traffic which can lead to even more sessions created.
We were - but you wouldn't think of that, when you hope fo
On Jun 1, 2007, at 7:50 PM, Guido Neitzer wrote:
Consider an example (we don't own the project, so I hope you won't
consider this an advertisement): http://www.legalsounds.com/
InspectArtist?__key=3339
On the first glance I have two questions: how well does the
application handle search en
On Jun 1, 2007, at 10:08 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
And the second question: how did you do the URL creation? I'm
still looking for a good way of creating "nice" URLs. I'm
absolutely no Apache specialist, I know it's the WebServer used on
Mac OS X Server ... okay, no kidding, I know a bit but n
On 01.06.2007, at 12:08, Mike Schrag wrote:
A few months back I added some things into to Wonder to make the WO
side a little easier. If you override ERXApplication_rewriteURL
(String url), you can write the "formatter" and in apache rewrite
rules, you write the "parser".
We do apache rew
And the second question: how did you do the URL creation? I'm still
looking for a good way of creating "nice" URLs. I'm absolutely no
Apache specialist, I know it's the WebServer used on Mac OS X
Server ... okay, no kidding, I know a bit but not nearly enough.
Over the time I saw a couple o
On 01.06.2007, at 01:02, Denis Frolov wrote:
I have one too and use it for Admin apps.
Yeah, makes sense not to re-invent the wheel too often ... ;-) One of
the problems I have with that, is that my "Admin" applications are
normally also user / customer accessed applications, so they have
On May 31, 2007, at 8:48 PM, Guido Neitzer wrote:
On 31.05.2007, at 00:23, Denis Frolov wrote:
You actually don't have to change layout of framework's D2W pages.
I usually start a project by subclassing all the D2W-pages
(InpsectPage extends ERD2WInspectPage, ListPage extends
ERD2WListPa
On 31.05.2007, at 00:23, Denis Frolov wrote:
You actually don't have to change layout of framework's D2W pages.
I usually start a project by subclassing all the D2W-pages
(InpsectPage extends ERD2WInspectPage, ListPage extends
ERD2WListPage, MessagePage extends ERD2WMessagePage, etc) and us
On May 30, 2007, at 5:55 PM, Guido Neitzer wrote:
On 29.05.2007, at 22:05, Lachlan Deck wrote:
Naturally I can subclass and provide a defaultPage(WOContext) but
I'm wondering how much of the D2W components/framework require a
session to work?
All of them. There is no D2W without a session
On 29.05.2007, at 22:05, Lachlan Deck wrote:
Naturally I can subclass and provide a defaultPage(WOContext) but
I'm wondering how much of the D2W components/framework require a
session to work?
All of them. There is no D2W without a session. So, D2W is a good
choice for anything where the
Am 30.05.2007 um 06:05 schrieb Lachlan Deck:
Does anyone know which of the D2W components (whether from Apple or
ProjectWonder) are session-less friendly?
None. The factory wants a session with every page and even if it
didn't, it's really not worth the bother. It's only mem, after all.
C
Hi there,
just delving into the world of D2W (after all this time)... I notice
that D2W.defaultPage(WOSession) needs a session.
Naturally I can subclass and provide a defaultPage(WOContext) but I'm
wondering how much of the D2W components/framework require a session
to work?
Does anyone
22 matches
Mail list logo
