On 8 Sep 2016, at 4:51 PM, Fabian Peters wrote:
>>> Thanks for looking into this and bonus points for thinking of the maven
>>> users!
>>
>> I wish I was a Maven user.
>
> What's keeping you?
Waiting for Hugi to tell me how.
>> Unfortunately, I don’t know the specifics of what to do for thos
Hi Paul,
>> Thanks for looking into this and bonus points for thinking of the maven
>> users!
>
> I wish I was a Maven user.
What's keeping you?
>> From what I see, the two frameworks in "Mail" are not being considered for
>> maven builds. Meaning the maven build contains the version from "Co
Hi Fabian,
On 8 Sep 2016, at 3:30 PM, Fabian Peters wrote:
> Thanks for looking into this and bonus points for thinking of the maven users!
I wish I was a Maven user.
> From what I see, the two frameworks in "Mail" are not being considered for
> maven builds. Meaning the maven build contains
Hi Paul,
Thanks for looking into this and bonus points for thinking of the maven users!
From what I see, the two frameworks in "Mail" are not being considered for
maven builds. Meaning the maven build contains the version from "Core" for now.
To move forward we'd have to:
* add a pom file to
Hello,
As noted by Flavio in another thread, there seems to be two versions of
ERJavaMail in the Wonder repo.
1. Ray committed fe953bf8 on 5 October 2015. This commit copies ERJavaMail from
Frameworks/Core to Frameworks/Mail, without deleting the former. It also
updates Build/build/build.xml s
