Re: Weird problem: JavaMonitor cannot launch any application

eems normal), I'm eager to understand it, test it, and if it >>> is the culprit, fix it. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> OC >>> >>>>> On Feb 13, 2025, at 6:50 AM, OCsite via Webobjects-dev >>>>> wrote: >>>&g

Re: Weird problem: JavaMonitor cannot launch any application

Whew! I sort of think this qualifies as a wotaskd bug; where and whom to report it? > On 13. 2. 2025, at 15:07, OCsite via Webobjects-dev > wrote: > It looks like it was caused by an existence of /tmp/logWebObjects, added > there to log the adaptor. What the?!? Does not make any sense to m

Re: Weird problem: JavaMonitor cannot launch any application

avaMonitor never launches any application, >>> otherwise all seems normal), I'm eager to understand it, test it, and if it >>> is the culprit, fix it. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> OC >>> >>>>> On Feb 13, 2025, at 6:50 AM, OCsite vi

Re: Weird problem: JavaMonitor cannot launch any application

ause the described behaviour (JavaMonitor never launches any application, >> otherwise all seems normal), I'm eager to understand it, test it, and if it >> is the culprit, fix it. >> >> Thanks! >> OC >> >>>> On Feb 13, 2025, at 6:50 AM,

Re: Weird problem: JavaMonitor cannot launch any application

> > Thanks! > OC > >>> On Feb 13, 2025, at 6:50 AM, OCsite via Webobjects-dev >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi there, >>> >>> today we have bumped into a completely new and weird problem: JavaMonitor >>> cannot launch any applic

Re: Weird problem: JavaMonitor cannot launch any application

>> Hi there, >> >> today we have bumped into a completely new and weird problem: JavaMonitor >> cannot launch any application, just increases the number of deaths. >> >> Nothing at all occurs in the application log. The access rights of both the >> log

Re: Weird problem: JavaMonitor cannot launch any application

Wotaskd? > On Feb 13, 2025, at 6:50 AM, OCsite via Webobjects-dev > wrote: > > Hi there, > > today we have bumped into a completely new and weird problem: JavaMonitor > cannot launch any application, just increases the number of deaths. > > Nothing at all occurs

Weird problem: JavaMonitor cannot launch any application

Hi there, today we have bumped into a completely new and weird problem: JavaMonitor cannot launch any application, just increases the number of deaths. Nothing at all occurs in the application log. The access rights of both the log file and its folder are OK; the disk is not full. When I try

Re: Weird problem when sending mail with ERJavaMail

Thanks all who came up with ideas. With your help and the help of Mr. Google I finally found out what to do: Had to define the following property: mail.smtp.localhost=gugus.rucotec.ch This was not needed up to now but maybe, perhaps I did upgrade my mail server f

Re: Weird problem when sending mail with ERJavaMail

Hi Markus, do you have reverse DNS records in place that would resolve 192.168.56.46 to a FQDN? Maik > Am 27.04.2019 um 14:45 schrieb Markus Ruggiero : > > When I try to send mail I get that weird error and mail fails. Why would the > receiver address be rejected? I never had problems so far

Weird problem when sending mail with ERJavaMail

When I try to send mail I get that weird error and mail fails. Why would the receiver address be rejected? I never had problems so far. Anyone can spot something I miss? I am sending from the development machine which has a local DHCP address and thus no fully qualified host name, but the error

Re: Weird problem with ERXGenericRecord

Thanks a lot. There is so much buried in those frameworks and many things are realy obscure in themselves ---markus--- > On 2 Apr 2017, at 01:35, Ricardo Parada wrote: > > Hi Markus, > > I ran into that problem before with a restricting qualifier in one of our > entities. I fixed it by doin

Re: Weird problem with ERXGenericRecord

Hi Markus, I ran into that problem before with a restricting qualifier in one of our entities. I fixed it by doing what Fabian suggested. Ricardo > On Apr 1, 2017, at 2:18 AM, Fabian Peters wrote: > > Hi Markus, > > To me it looks like you're getting bitten by the > "applyRestrictingQuali

Re: Weird problem with ERXGenericRecord

Hi Markus, To me it looks like you're getting bitten by the "applyRestrictingQualifierOnInsert" feature: ## Specifies that you want restricting qualifiers "applied" to your newly ## inserted objects. For instance, if you have an entity that is part of ## single table inheritance and your restri

Weird problem with ERXGenericRecord

In a large project we have used "extends EOGenericRecord" in our _Entity.java templates. Just recently we wondered why (probably just an oversight) and changed that to "extends ERXGenericRecord". Don't see any reason why this should not work. One of our entities (ElectronicDocument) in the eomo

Re: today's weird problem: how can EO's EC get nulled?

You should do something like ERXLongResponse csvTask(ERXGenericRecord eo) { EOGlobalID gid = eo.permanentGlobalID(); ImportCSVTask task = new ImportCSVTask(gid); ... } class ImportCSVTask { private EOGlobalID _gid; ImportCSVTask(EOGlobalID gid) {

Re: today's weird problem: how can EO's EC get nulled?

Ramsey, > Can’t really tell looking a pseudo code, but I’ll take a guess. that's my very real code, just I've removed things unrelated (hundreds of lines) to keep it manageable -- if possible, removing them altogether, if not, at least replacing them by "... description ...". But what remained

Re: today's weird problem: how can EO's EC get nulled?

Can’t really tell looking a pseudo code, but I’ll take a guess. Auto locking works on a single thread. You can’t pass EOs to a background thread. You need to pass EOGlobalIDs to your runnable constructor instead and then create your new ec on the background thread when you begin processing. Yo

today's weird problem: how can EO's EC get nulled?

Hello there, well, the last fixes seem to have helped, at least, so far no problem related. Today though I've found one new problem, (hopefully) unrelated -- an EO somehow lost its EC?!? The user can import CSV; since it takes a small eternity, the import runs in a background task. The code es

Re: Weird problem with EOModel create SQL

Weird things were going on. All of a sudden things did not work anymore. Not only generating SQL hickuped but also create new entity in EOModeler: the entity did not get the default id attribute. I decided to clean up everything WO / ER related and installed everything anew and everything work

Re: Weird problem with EOModel create SQL

Was this in a framework? Is the MySQL plugin on the class path in the framework? -- Chuck Hill Executive Managing Partner, VP Development and Technical Services Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific

Weird problem with EOModel create SQL

I have no idea what might have changed but all of a sudden when creating SQL from an EOModel I get the comment text "The 'Create Primary Key Support' option is unavailable." in the script. Checking and unchecking the related checkbox shows or hides this comment. This is against a MySQL database.

Re: Weird problem with D2W rules

On 1 apr. 2013, at 18:33, Ramsey Gurley wrote: > And evidently, I didn't configure my push to push the new 6.0.3 tag :P > > Anyway, try the latest master Freddie and see if your problem goes away. > Yes, that resolves the problem! thanks!! >> >> On Mar 30, 2013, at 11:18 AM, Ramsey Gurley

Re: Weird problem with D2W rules

eGit does the trick for me. I have no desire to dive down to the command line for something the IDE can do :-) I have a limited amount of brain bucket and I'm not filling it up with CLI flags if I can help it. That's just me tho. Ramsey On Apr 1, 2013, at 11:52 AM, Dan Beatty wrote: > So Pasca

Re: Weird problem with D2W rules

So Pascal, Ramsey, and fellow members of the Wonder gang, If I were to teach a course and should need recommendations for the way to teach and learn Git; what packages, books, online references, etc would you recommend as a kind of training wheels for said students? Also, if I were to produce an i

Re: Weird problem with D2W rules

Le 2013-04-01 à 13:02, Ramsey Gurley a écrit : > I merged the fix to the master and integration branches. As far as I can > tell, I've got everything done except pushing the tag on master. It just > wasn't in my push configuration. I can try again when I get home tonight. > > As for releasing

Re: Weird problem with D2W rules

Hmm, seems even the temp branch is unnecessary. I just right click on the commit in history, and merge into my local master. So it should just be a tag and a push away. I'll do that tonight, but I'll probably go with commit b8f4bbd4b6f7ee4884f6cc9c077c1f589091d4db since not having that one is

Re: Weird problem with D2W rules

I merged the fix to the master and integration branches. As far as I can tell, I've got everything done except pushing the tag on master. It just wasn't in my push configuration. I can try again when I get home tonight. As for releasing other integration changes, I tend to use eGit for everythin

Re: Weird problem with D2W rules

In that case, do a real 6.0.3 release • Switch into the master branch • Check the Git history of the integration branch and note the last commit that should be integrated into master (a9426b5ed8a806b6a7292209f8783416bce1a046 is a good candidate for 6.0.3). • Do a merge with the commit id of th

Re: Weird problem with D2W rules

And evidently, I didn't configure my push to push the new 6.0.3 tag :P Anyway, try the latest master Freddie and see if your problem goes away. Ramsey On Mar 30, 2013, at 3:17 PM, Ramsey Gurley wrote: > > On Mar 30, 2013, at 11:18 AM, Ramsey Gurley wrote: > >> >> On Mar 29, 2013, at 3:37 PM,

Re: Weird problem with D2W rules

On Mar 30, 2013, at 11:18 AM, Ramsey Gurley wrote: > > On Mar 29, 2013, at 3:37 PM, Ramsey Gurley wrote: > >> On Mar 29, 2013, at 2:27 PM, Freddie Tilley wrote: >> >>> at >>> er.modern.directtoweb.components.header.ERMD2WSimpleHeader.headerString(ERMD2WSimpleHeader.java:25) >>> >> >> My

Re: Weird problem with D2W rules

On Mar 29, 2013, at 3:37 PM, Ramsey Gurley wrote: > On Mar 29, 2013, at 2:27 PM, Freddie Tilley wrote: > >> at >> er.modern.directtoweb.components.header.ERMD2WSimpleHeader.headerString(ERMD2WSimpleHeader.java:25) >> > > My wonder says that line is: > > return stringValueForBinding(Keys

Re: Weird problem with D2W rules

On Mar 29, 2013, at 2:27 PM, Freddie Tilley wrote: > at > er.modern.directtoweb.components.header.ERMD2WSimpleHeader.headerString(ERMD2WSimpleHeader.java:25) > My wonder says that line is: return stringValueForBinding(Keys.displayNameForPageConfiguration); What is your rule for displayN

Re: Weird problem with D2W rules

On 29 mrt. 2013, at 22:10, Ramsey Gurley wrote: > > On Mar 29, 2013, at 12:40 PM, Freddie Tilley wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm having a strange issue with a D2w rule. >> >> the left hand side is as follows: >> >> (task = 'edit' and entity.name = 'AMEvent' and object.eventType = '1') with >> a

Re: Weird problem with D2W rules

On Mar 29, 2013, at 12:40 PM, Freddie Tilley wrote: > Hi, > > I'm having a strange issue with a D2w rule. > > the left hand side is as follows: > > (task = 'edit' and entity.name = 'AMEvent' and object.eventType = '1') with a > right hand side key of displayPropertyKeys I just added object

Re: Weird problem with D2W rules

I'm using a com.webobjects.directtoweb.Assignment, using a ERDDelayedAssignment produces the same results. And also have a rule for the other possible type of event (task = 'edit' and entity.name = 'AMEvent' and object.eventType = '2') It seems like the lhs always get's evaluated in its en

Re: Weird problem with D2W rules

Are you using the delayed assignment? Sent from my iPad On 2013-03-29, at 12:40 PM, Freddie Tilley wrote: > Hi, > > I'm having a strange issue with a D2w rule. > > the left hand side is as follows: > > (task = 'edit' and entity.name = 'AMEvent' and object.eventType = '1') with a > right h

Weird problem with D2W rules

Hi, I'm having a strange issue with a D2w rule. the left hand side is as follows: (task = 'edit' and entity.name = 'AMEvent' and object.eventType = '1') with a right hand side key of displayPropertyKeys The thing is is that the object.eventType will get called on objects that aren't even AME

Re: Weird problem with setPrefetchingRelationshipKeyPaths

HI Miguel, On Mar 16, 2008, at 11:32 AM, Miguel Arroz wrote: I have an entity A where each object contains some references to other objects in entity B (each A contains some Bs, but each B is on a diferente relation). The relations are one-to-one, and are modeled only from A to B. That

Re: Weird problem with setPrefetchingRelationshipKeyPaths

Miguel, Perhaps you've also specified that the fetch specification you're using should refresh re-fetched objects? If so - it will also refresh any relationships you've asked it to pre-fetch. From the EOFetchSpecification javadoc: "Assigning relationships to prefetch also has an effect on

Weird problem with setPrefetchingRelationshipKeyPaths

Hi! I have an entity A where each object contains some references to other objects in entity B (each A contains some Bs, but each B is on a diferente relation). The relations are one-to-one, and are modeled only from A to B. I'm fetching some objects from entity A, and I'm using set

Nevermind Re: Weird problem ...

Nevermind - I think it is a problem with a framework. I am using a different tack that is working. On Oct 17, 2007, at 4:57 PM, James Cicenia wrote: Anyone? Even a rough guess? Even without the popup window... D2WQuery just brings in a completely different page?! simple: binding:

Re: Weird problem ...

Anyone? Even a rough guess? Even without the popup window... D2WQuery just brings in a completely different page?! simple: binding: QueryProject: D2WQuery { displayKeys = "(title)"; action = filterProjects; queryDataSource = queryDataSource; entityN

Weird problem ...

Hello - I have a problem that I have never seen before and is stumping me. I have a popup page that uses the javascript modal window which I have used throughout my app. It does in fact pop up the window and then load the components etc. HOWEVER -- I have a D2WQuery component in the page. If I