One thing I am finding infuriating about the Silverstripe UI is the
commit comments popup.
Commit comments are very important for us to allow tracking and
reasoning/discussion about changes made to the site. In fact, one
might say they are the backbone of a versioning system.
The thing that bugs
Hi Michael, *,
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Michael Wheatland
wrote:
>
> The thing that bugs me is that I cannot change tabs in order to copy
> text or insert a link reference once the comments popup is displayed.
> Is anyone else finding this incredibly annoying?
No - as why would you stil
> Sorry, but I really don't get your problem. If you're not done with
> the work, then don't publish. As easy as that.
> If you want to paste something into the comment-box, copy it before
> hitting save & publish, that isn't that hard to adapt to, is it?
> just hit cancel, dialog is away, copy, hi
Hi Michael, *,
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Michael Wheatland
wrote:
>
> Having a popup which stops me using my browser is very annoying.
>
> Is this a Silverstripe bug?
Well - when it's working as designed, you cannot really call it a bug, can you?
But I'll see how much effort it is to tur
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 6:15 AM, Christian Lohmaier
wrote:
> Hi Michael, *,
>
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Michael Wheatland
> wrote:
>>
>> Having a popup which stops me using my browser is very annoying.
>>
>> Is this a Silverstripe bug?
>
> Well - when it's working as designed, you cannot
Hi *,
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Michael Wheatland
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 6:15 AM, Christian Lohmaier
> wrote:
>>
>> But I'll see how much effort it is to turn that one into a non-modal one.
>>
> It just seems to be an inconsistency with the UI, it holds you out
> from doing oth
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Christian Lohmaier
wrote:
> Hi *,
>
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Michael Wheatland
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 6:15 AM, Christian Lohmaier
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> But I'll see how much effort it is to turn that one into a non-modal one.
>>>
>> It just se
Hi Michael,
please try to work on your quoting, the fullquotes are a very bad habit...
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 2:37 AM, Michael Wheatland
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Christian Lohmaier
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:43 AM, Michael Wheatland
>
> Rimas is correct, I was ref
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Christian Lohmaier
wrote:
>> If this is a non-pluggable part of the Silverstripe UI, I don't expect
>> you to do anything about it. I just think it is poorly implemented UI
>> and was looking for other options to improve our experience.
>
> That's bullshit, sorry
I would like to bring a fresh perspective to this debate:
The pop up comes as the final step when someone submits changes. The box is
designed as modal for a SPECIAL purpose: You are NOT supposed to submit any
change without a justification/remark.
Making it modal actually preserves the overal
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Narayan Aras wrote:
>
> I would like to bring a fresh perspective to this debate:
> The pop up comes as the final step when someone submits changes. The box is
> designed as modal for a SPECIAL purpose: You are NOT supposed to submit any
> change without a justif
On Friday 28 January 2011, Michael Wheatland wrote:
> Now that someone has explained why it was implemented that way I
> understand the reasoning.
> I still would like to copy and paste links in there from other tabs.
> ie. discussion links on Nabble.
> Guess I will just have to remember to copy th
2011/1/28 Harri Pitkänen :
> On Friday 28 January 2011, Michael Wheatland wrote:
>> Now that someone has explained why it was implemented that way I
>> understand the reasoning.
>> I still would like to copy and paste links in there from other tabs.
>> ie. discussion links on Nabble.
>> Guess I wil
Hi Michael,
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:31 AM, Michael Wheatland
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Christian Lohmaier
> wrote:
> [...]
> I am simply raising my concerns
> regarding the web infrastructure that we are using, which we can
> hopefully fix.
Well, you don't want me to change t
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Christian Lohmaier
wrote:
>
> Well - what you write doesn't make any sense at all. Again:
> * You complain about the modal prompt
> * I propse to change it
> * You don't want me to change thte CMS' code
To give some context,I subscribe to the view that hacking the
Hi Michael, *,
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 7:15 AM, Michael Wheatland
wrote:
>
> To give some context,I subscribe to the view that hacking the core CMS
> code means that you 'might' introduce new bugs, resulting in something
> that cannot be supported by the CMS community.
cmsworkflow is already a mo
16 matches
Mail list logo
