Martin MC Brown wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Martin MC Brown wrote:
>>> You then configure the module configs to be included by editing the /
>>> etc/conf.d/apache file with the list of -D MODULE elements to include
>>> on the command line.
>> So editing the file is needed to enable a module/app?
>
> No, i
Martin MC Brown wrote:
>
> >One of the goals here is that a baseline level of functionality must
> >"Just Work" merely by installing the relevant package(s).
>
> It will.
Cool, that's my main concern, so if that works the rest is [important]
details.
> The only think you would need to do during
Hi,
> Martin MC Brown wrote:
>>
>> You then configure the module configs to be included by editing the /
>> etc/conf.d/apache file with the list of -D MODULE elements to include
>> on the command line.
>
> So editing the file is needed to enable a module/app?
No, in each of the module specific fi
Martin MC Brown wrote:
>
> You then configure the module configs to be included by editing the /
> etc/conf.d/apache file with the list of -D MODULE elements to include
> on the command line.
So editing the file is needed to enable a module/app?
One of the goals here is that a baseline level
On 18 Jul 2008, at 15:14, Martin MC Brown wrote:
>
> It's not my system, so I'm not going to defend it's merits, but
> compared to providing, using and supporting yet another tool,
> compared to using an existing method that works within the existing
> OpenSolaris framework, I know which I w
Hi Nick,
>>
>> Gentoo place the sample module configurations into conf.d, and then
>> use the defines system built into Apache to select which modules to
>> actually use.
>
> and can make for a support nightmare:
>
> - luser wonders why [foo] doesn't work
> - luser has spent ages trying differ
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:04:52 +0100
Martin MC Brown wrote:
> Gentoo place the sample module configurations into conf.d, and then
> use the defines system built into Apache to select which modules to
> actually use.
and can make for a support nightmare:
- luser wonders why [foo] doesn't w
Hi,
> IIRC this was briefly mentioned in the past, but I'd like to hear from
> the Apache team if there is still interest/consideration in providing
> a programmatic module enable/disable interface (CLI).
>
> In Debian there is a2enmod and a2dismod which are used to enable/
> disable
> available
On 14 Jul 2008, at 22:55, Jyri Virkki wrote:
> IIRC this was briefly mentioned in the past, but I'd like to hear from
> the Apache team if there is still interest/consideration in providing
> a programmatic module enable/disable interface (CLI).
>
> In Debian there is a2enmod and a2dismod which ar
Nick Kew wrote:
> >In Debian there is a2enmod and a2dismod which are used to enable/
> >disable available Apache modules.
>
> I don't really like it, but many do. You have a fair point.
>
> On the basis of Least Surprise, I'd suggest that if we implement any
> such thing, we should start by clo
IIRC this was briefly mentioned in the past, but I'd like to hear from
the Apache team if there is still interest/consideration in providing
a programmatic module enable/disable interface (CLI).
In Debian there is a2enmod and a2dismod which are used to enable/disable
available Apache modules.
As
11 matches
Mail list logo
