Re: [Webware-devel] Page is too heavy-laden

2004-09-30 Thread Aaron Switzer
Actually I didn't refactor Page because I thought it was too heavy, I kept at least 90% of it unchanged, and in fact added to it. I changed it because I wanted to use XML/XSLT to produce my output. I do agree that a "lower-level" extension point would be useful and more inline with OO design. I

Re: [Webware-devel] Page is too heavy-laden

2004-09-30 Thread Kyle VanderBeek
On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 08:55:41AM -0400, Aaron Switzer wrote: > There's no reason why you can't just create your own version of Page. I > ran into the same situation as you, in that I didn't want to embed HTML > right into the servlets, so I took Page and cut out what I didn't need > and added a

Re: [Webware-devel] Page is too heavy-laden

2004-09-30 Thread Kyle VanderBeek
On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 08:55:41AM -0400, Aaron Switzer wrote: [snip] > ...so I took Page and cut out what I didn't need > and added a couple of things. I use my version of Page as the > super-class for all of my servlets. Forgot to mention: doesn't this sentence scream to you that a refactoring

Re: [Webware-devel] Page is too heavy-laden

2004-09-30 Thread Winston Wolff
Hello Mr. VanderBeek- I've been using WebWare for a month now and I am rather happy with Webware. The thing I like best about Webware is it's simplicity which makes it easy to alter to do what I want. As you have already seen, when a module such as Page isn't exactly right, you can easily follow

Re: [Webware-devel] Page is too heavy-laden

2004-09-30 Thread nordkyn
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:24:53 -0700 Kyle VanderBeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm evaluating WebWare for possible uses at my company. However, I'm > distressed by how heavyweight and html-specific WebKit.Page is. I think > it is bothersome, a little confusing, and not very graceful when it > c

[Webware-devel] Page is too heavy-laden

2004-09-30 Thread Kyle VanderBeek
I'm evaluating WebWare for possible uses at my company. However, I'm distressed by how heavyweight and html-specific WebKit.Page is. I think it is bothersome, a little confusing, and not very graceful when it comes to wanting to write a webapp that extends the toolkit. My primary gripe is tha

Re: [Webware-devel] Page is too heavy-laden

2004-09-30 Thread Aaron Switzer
There's no reason why you can't just create your own version of Page. I ran into the same situation as you, in that I didn't want to embed HTML right into the servlets, so I took Page and cut out what I didn't need and added a couple of things. I use my version of Page as the super-class for all

Re: [Webware-devel] Page is too heavy-laden

2004-09-30 Thread Winston WOLFF
Hello Mr. VanderBeek- I've been using WebWare for a month now and I am rather happy with Webware. The thing I like best about Webware is it's simplicity which makes it easy to alter to do what I want. As you have already seen, when a module such as Page isn't exactly right, you can easily follow