Patches item #1578963, was opened at 2006-10-17 15:41
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by cito
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=304866&aid=1578963&group_id=4866
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
Patches item #1578963, was opened at 2006-10-17 15:41
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by cito
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=304866&aid=1578963&group_id=4866
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thr
Dan Milstein wrote:
> After looking carefully at HTTPHandler, I think I've found a way
> to avoid holding that file in memory. I wanted to ask the list if
> there was a reason for the current design that I'm missing. If not,
> I'd propose the patch below as an improvement to the built-in HTTP
Yo,
I'm in the process of moving from mod_webkit to using the built-in
HTTP server (because my hosting co wants to run my webapp behind
Apache mod_rewrite/mod_proxy).
My service supports uploads of some very large files. This worked
fine under mod_webkit, which is what we had been using.
