[Webware-discuss] MiddleKit enhancement for more complex references

2001-11-02 Thread Thomas Kumlehn
Imagine an MKObject that references several objects of the same klass and this class wants to list these references. Example: Person (personId) in SQL toDo -> list of Task askedFor -> list of Task reportsFrom -> list of Task Task assignedTo -> Person

[Webware-discuss] Newbie setup question

2001-11-02 Thread Eduardo Elgueta
Title: Hi All,Whenever I try to run a Webware page (.PSP) I get this:Mod_python error: "PythonHandler ModPythonAdapter"Traceback (innermost last):  File "/usr/lib/python1.5/site-packages/mod_python/apache.py", line 181, in Dispatch    module = import_module(module_name, _req)  File "/usr

Re: [Webware-discuss] an informal WEP: refactoring webware's package layout and component system

2001-11-02 Thread Tavis Rudd
On Friday 02 November 2001 12:43, Chuck Esterbrook wrote: > At 06:17 PM 11/1/2001 -0800, Tavis Rudd wrote: > >My argument isn't to do with what's provided, but rather who is > >responsible for providing it. It would make more sense to me for > > the component to install some docs to a central Webw

Re: [Webware-discuss] an informal WEP: refactoring webware's package layout and component system

2001-11-02 Thread Chuck Esterbrook
At 10:47 AM 11/2/2001 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >The problem with structured text formats is that they become cumbersome once >you need to add things like tables, and I find that documents without >tables or images tend to sacrifice clarity by expressing everything as >"dry text" within a

Re: [Webware-discuss] MiscUtils and WebUtils name

2001-11-02 Thread Chuck Esterbrook
At 01:13 PM 11/2/2001 -0800, Mike Orr wrote: >How about WWMiscUtils & WWWebUtils, or ChuckMiscUtils & ChuckWebUtils, >or ceMiscUtils & ceWebUtils (using Chuck's initials)? Those names are >much less generic, thus making others feel better about giving Chuck >"ownership" of those prefixes. There'

[Webware-discuss] MiscUtils and WebUtils name

2001-11-02 Thread Mike Orr
On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 12:43:56PM -0800, Chuck Esterbrook wrote: > >> What clearly identifies MiddleKit and UserKit as being part of > >> Webware any more than *Utils? The Webware project is (or will be) known as "the organization that provides *Kit", just like Egenix is "the company that provid

[Webware-discuss] mailing list topics

2001-11-02 Thread Chuck Esterbrook
BTW In the future, I think issues like refactoring, internal architecture and so on should be on webware-devel while webware-discuss should have all end user issues and important high-level cvs update notifications. When we have intense -devel style talks on -discuss, we always lose a few subs

[Webware-discuss] cvs update: WebKit works for Python 2.2

2001-11-02 Thread Chuck Esterbrook
I have fixed Transaction.die() and tested with Python 2.1 and 2.2b1 (but not extensively). If you are using Python 2.2, you can grab the latest CVS or wait for the next beta release of Webware 0.6. -Chuck ___ Webware-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PR

Re: [Webware-discuss] Webware startup/shutdown script

2001-11-02 Thread Clark C . Evans
On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 02:50:45PM -0500, Clark C . Evans wrote: | I had another request for Monitor.py ... how do I get it | to send its output to a log file? Patch attached... but the log file is hard coded. This should read from perhaps a new config file in the Configs dir? Clark 46,47c46,4

Re: [Webware-discuss] an informal WEP: refactoring webware's package layout and component system

2001-11-02 Thread Chuck Esterbrook
At 06:17 PM 11/1/2001 -0800, Tavis Rudd wrote: >My argument isn't to do with what's provided, but rather who is >responsible for providing it. It would make more sense to me for the >component to install some docs to a central Webware location when its >setup.py is run. That way no assumptions ar

Re: [Webware-discuss] Using Webware with Python2.2

2001-11-02 Thread Chuck Esterbrook
At 02:06 PM 11/2/2001 -0500, Su Zhang wrote: >Traceback (most recent call last): > File "WebKit\ThreadedAppServer.py", line 252, in threadloop > rh.handleRequest() > File "WebKit\ThreadedAppServer.py", line 505, in handleRequest > transaction.die() > File "WebKit\Transaction.py", lin

Re: [Webware-discuss] Webware startup/shutdown script

2001-11-02 Thread Mike Orr
On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 02:36:17PM -0500, Clark C . Evans wrote: > How do I get it to run the webware process under the > user "webware"? Which operating system? On a Unix-like OS, you: 1) Create the user ("useradd webware" or edit /etc/passwd. Since the user shouldn't log in, give them

Re: [Webware-discuss] Webware startup/shutdown script

2001-11-02 Thread Clark C . Evans
On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 02:36:17PM -0500, Clark C . Evans wrote: | On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 07:26:09PM -0400, Jay Love wrote: | | In the current release, there's a program called Monitor (I think it's | | named wkMonitor in 0.51) that will start the AppServer and then monitor | | it and will rets

Re: [Webware-discuss] Using Webware with Python2.2

2001-11-02 Thread Chuck Esterbrook
At 02:06 PM 11/2/2001 -0500, Su Zhang wrote: > File "WebKit\Transaction.py", line 126, in die > delattr(self, attrName) >AttributeError: Transaction instance has no attribute '__doc__' > >BTW, I didn't get such message with Python 2.1. Someone reported that delattr() was broken in Pytho

Re: [Webware-discuss] Webware startup/shutdown script

2001-11-02 Thread Clark C . Evans
On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 07:26:09PM -0400, Jay Love wrote: | In the current release, there's a program called Monitor (I think it's | named wkMonitor in 0.51) that will start the AppServer and then monitor | it and will retstart it if it crashes or kill it and retstart it if it | stops respondin

[Webware-discuss] Using Webware with Python2.2

2001-11-02 Thread Su Zhang
Hi, I'm new to Webware. When I run Webkit's AppServer (webkit.cgi) using Python 2.2b1, I get the following Traceback: Listening on ('127.0.0.1', 8086) Creating 10 threads.. win32 extensions not present. Webkit Will not be able to detatch from the contr olling terminal. Ready

Re: [Webware-discuss] an informal WEP: refactoring webware's package layout and component system

2001-11-02 Thread Aaron Held
> 4) Get rid of TaskKit. It's better to do this sort of stuff on a > case-by-case basis, as illustrated by the implementation of > SessionStore in the redesign code. Simpler, faster, smaller. Can someone detail this for me? I'm running webware .6a1 and looking at the cvs online, but where is

Re: [Webware-discuss] an informal WEP: refactoring webware's package layout and component system

2001-11-02 Thread Geoff Talvola
At 10:47 AM 11/2/01 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >But COMKit seems not to have anything to do with all those people who > >don't use Windows. It's already written, so if it's longer than > >necessary it doesn't really matter. > >What does COMKit do anyway? On my platform it won't even load.

Re: [Webware-discuss] an informal WEP: refactoring webware's package layout and component system

2001-11-02 Thread paul
Ian Bicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I also really dislike WebUtils because, in order to get into WebKit I >have to hit WK instead of just W. But that's probably >not the best reason. That's probably the most compelling reason to rename it that I've read so far - insufficient tab leverage