At 9:09 AM -0500 12/11/01, Geoffrey Talvola wrote:
>There's also wkcgi, which is a compiled C binary CGI adapter, which will be
>faster than WebKit.cgi but not as fast as mod_webkit.
Thanks. I'll check it out.
Richard Gordon
Gordon Design
Web Design/Database Development
htt
On Tue, 2001-12-11 at 18:52, Tavis Rudd wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 December 2001 15:32, Ian Bicking wrote:
> > Of course, CGI-based adapters should still work with IIS -- but
> > spawning a process on Windows is slow. I believe IIS also supports
> > FastCGI, so that adapter could potentially be used
On Tue, 2001-12-11 at 17:02, Luke Opperman wrote:
> So in order to use this for two VirtualHost entries, do I
> need two copies of WebKit.cgi, with different AppWorkDirs?
> or is there a better way?
No, you will use the same AppServer and adapter for both domains.
You'll just make a seperate con
On Tuesday 11 December 2001 15:32, Ian Bicking wrote:
> Of course, CGI-based adapters should still work with IIS -- but
> spawning a process on Windows is slow. I believe IIS also supports
> FastCGI, so that adapter could potentially be used -- I was never
> able to configure it with Apache, but
I seem to remember, just before the effort on it stalled, that some
particularly egregious memory leak was fixed (though there may have been
more). But that was a long time ago.
Of course, CGI-based adapters should still work with IIS -- but spawning
a process on Windows is slow. I believe IIS
At 02:57 PM 12/11/01 -0800, Luke Opperman wrote:
>Ok guys (including gals),
>
>Ok, rewrite is making sense to me. Unfortunately, there
>doesn't seem to be a free ISAPI (IIS filter) similar to
>rewrite. So I guess I'll write my own simple one.
>
>Which leads me to my next question: The Docs mention
Jay Love started work on an ISAPI filter that behaves like
mod_webkit. I don't think it was ever finished and he said there
were problems with memory leaks. The code is in
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/webware/Webware/WebKit/Native/wkISAPI/
On Tuesday 11 December 2001 14:57,
So in order to use this for two VirtualHost entries, do I
need two copies of WebKit.cgi, with different AppWorkDirs?
or is there a better way?
Thanks,
Luke
--- Ian Bicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Check out:
>
http://webware.colorstudy.net/twiki/bin/view/Webware/ModRewriteRecipes
>
> If th
Ok guys (including gals),
Ok, rewrite is making sense to me. Unfortunately, there
doesn't seem to be a free ISAPI (IIS filter) similar to
rewrite. So I guess I'll write my own simple one.
Which leads me to my next question: The Docs mention plans
to port Webware to an ISAPI module. Is anyone cur
At 04:45 PM 12/11/01 -0500, Martin Doudoroff wrote:
>I vote for making the load/save behavior configurable. As it stands,
>debugging Session-related code is made significantly more inconvenient,
>because every time you need to test code you have to stop the appserver,
>hunt down the session files
I vote for making the load/save behavior configurable. As it stands,
debugging Session-related code is made significantly more inconvenient,
because every time you need to test code you have to stop the appserver,
hunt down the session files it laid, delete them, then restart the
appserver. That c
Tim,
I'm not sure what's going on with the logging, but ExtensionsToIgnore
isn't used for what you're trying to do. Its purpose is to ignore
files that should never be served by Webware or Apache.
See
http://webware.colorstudy.net/twiki/bin/view/Webware/ModRewriteRecipe
s for the solution to you
At 02:15 PM 12/11/01 -0500, Martin Doudoroff wrote:
>2) [0.6.1b1] It appears to me that the 'SessionStore' parameter in
>Application.config is being ignored when you use webkit.cgi or wkcgi.exe
>(under Windows): the app server always operates as "Dynamic" or "File" (hard
>to tell the difference).
How exactly does extensions to ignore work in the app config? I thought
that it would ignore any files with those extensions and pass them to
whatever would regularly serve them. Now I think it is the other way
around...
I had added .jpg, .png, and .gif to the extensions to ignore thinking
th
On Tuesday 11 December 2001 12:28, Geoffrey Talvola wrote:
> Chuck has written some nifty code to make it easy to replace class
> methods after the fact. It's in MiscUtils/MixIn.py.
Hmm, I'd forgotten about that. It operates on the class rather than
the instances, as I was suggesting. Much be
At 12:53 PM 12/11/01 -0800, Tavis Rudd wrote:
>On Tuesday 11 December 2001 11:15, Martin Doudoroff wrote:
> > Three session questions:
> > 1) MY BURNING QUESTION: What is the "correct" way to
> > overwrite/extend/harness the expiring() method in the Session
> > object (Session.py)? Or is there a b
Check out:
http://webware.colorstudy.net/twiki/bin/view/Webware/ModRewriteRecipes
If that doesn't work for you, post your problems here and we can try to
expand that documentation.
On Tue, 2001-12-11 at 13:06, Luke Opperman wrote:
> Hi there.
>
> I'm finally running Webware (on Apache, although
Three session questions:
3) Lines 33-34 of WebKit/Session.py imply that the session timeout process
is not completed. As far as I can tell, the expiring() method (which does
nothing by default) is getting called automatically at the end of a
session's timeout period, and it _appears_ in my applic
Hi there.
I'm finally running Webware (on Apache, although I'll still
have to get it running on IIS for deployment).
I've got some general questions about URLs and virtual
domains.
First, say I have two domains on my server (for now, we'll
say I'm using Apache virtual directories).
/web/feed i
> The only issue I can think of is to make sure that any database
> extension modules or other 3rd-party extension modules you're
> using are
> solid. Someone on this mailing list had reliability problems
> that were
> traced to a faulty PostgreSQL module, I believe.
I've got a problem righ
On Monday December 10, 2001 07:12 pm, John Holland wrote:
> I may have a project at work to rewrite. I did it in Cold Fusion while
> learning web programming. I had the idea of redoing it in Webware, which I
> would love to do, but it is for a client in my organization that might want
> credenti
On Monday December 10, 2001 11:06 pm, Richard Gordon wrote:
> So is use of webware pretty much limited to situations where you have
> control over the server for installation/configuration purposes or am
> I overlooking something about it?
I would think that you could install WebKit.cgi into a cg
Sorry, my fault. I was doing a setDomain call on my development machine
--that's not on the same domain as the production one-- and IE6 was silently
junking the cookie. Well, that's been tested now :-)...
Thanks again for the help,
Costas
>From: Geoffrey Talvola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To:
23 matches
Mail list logo
