Re: [Webware-discuss] restated question about mod_webkit and apache 2.0

2007-12-31 Thread Mark Phillips
I have compiled a "how-to" for this process, blending the advice from Cactus at SME, with that from Gary and Christoph on this list. [url]http://www.mophilly.com/wiki/Installing_% 26_Configuring_Webware_on_SME_7.2[/url] I will add the instructions for the boot process, if there is anythin

Re: [Webware-discuss] restated question about mod_webkit and apache 2.0

2007-12-30 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Mark Phillips wrote: > FYI, next on my list of items to compete is the boot/shutdown script > for init.d, and Webware is ready for my application code. There are a few templates in WebKit/StartScripts, of which Webware picks one that seems to fit on your system. You may want to pick another one

Re: [Webware-discuss] restated question about mod_webkit and apache 2.0

2007-12-30 Thread Mark Phillips
Just a follow up on this topic: The compilation worked just fine following Gary's instructions with a couple of additional steps to conform to SME 7 standards as suggested by mcairn of the SME documentation team. The test of Webware worked fine; all the examples worked "out of the box", pro

Re: [Webware-discuss] restated question about mod_webkit and apache 2.0

2007-12-30 Thread Mark Phillips
On Dec 29, 2007, at 10:05 PM, Christoph Zwerschke wrote: > It should work with Apache 2.0 as well. Only the make.bat and dll file > for Windows are Apache 2.2 specific. Thank you, Chris, for the clarification. I look forward to setting this up soon. - Mark Phillips -

Re: [Webware-discuss] restated question about mod_webkit and apache 2.0

2007-12-29 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Mark Phillips wrote: > The WebKit discussion mentions apache 1.3. and apache 2.2. The WebKit > for apache 1.3 version won't work with apache 2.0. > > Will the WebKit for apache 2.2 work with apache 2.0? That is, is it > dependent on 2.2 features or is the reference to 2.2 the highest > versi

Re: [Webware-discuss] restated question about mod_webkit and apache 2.0

2007-12-29 Thread Mark Phillips
Quoting Gary Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I cannot address whether or not the latest version of Webware is dependent on any Apache 2.2-specific features, but--having used many different versions of Webware on a variety of different platforms and OSes--my guess is that its dependencies would be limi

Re: [Webware-discuss] restated question about mod_webkit and apache 2.0

2007-12-29 Thread Gary Perez
Hi Mark, I have Webware 0.9.2 running successfully on a CentOS 4.4 (Final) box with Apache 2.0.52 at work with no problems. I wrote up instructions to install Webware 0.9.4 on CentOS 5 with Apache 2.2.3, and if memory serves, the procedure for both is pretty much identical, and it's fairly

[Webware-discuss] restated question about mod_webkit and apache 2.0

2007-12-29 Thread Mark Phillips
My first note didn't explain my siutation well. Here is another go at it... I am planning to install the current Webware on a box running SME 7.2. SME Server 7 uses many packages from CentOS and RPMForge. As you may know, CentOS 4 is built from publicly available open source Red Hat Enter