Re: [Webware-discuss] webware as general app server for web/xmlrpc/soap ?

2004-03-29 Thread gtalvola
> 2. Multi-threaded. Although the global interpreter lock may prevent > scaling on SMP machines (hence twisteds async), I've found the > performance to be superb in my experience. It is very responsive while > handling simultaneous requests. Note that Twisted's async doesn't scale on SMP mac

Re: [Webware-discuss] webware as general app server for web/xmlrpc/soap ?

2004-03-29 Thread gtalvola
Tim Roberts wrote: > Umm, do you realize that Webware actually implements "dynamically > reloading modules" by "restarting the process"? The Webware process > cannot do dynamic reloading. It just watches the file system for > changes, and if one is detected, it commits suicide so a monitor pr

Re: [Webware-discuss] webware as general app server for web/xmlrpc/soap ?

2004-03-27 Thread Ian Bicking
On Mar 26, 2004, at 12:25 AM, Jason Hildebrand wrote: Although Webware allows you to reload individual modules, dependency problems can be a big issue, as dependencies do not get reloaded automatically. You'll also run into problems if you reload modules containing modified class definitions while

Re: [Webware-discuss] webware as general app server for web/xmlrpc/soap ?

2004-03-26 Thread Tim Roberts
On Wed, 24 Mar 2004 22:53:59 -0600, Randall Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am working on a project in which I have chosen to use xmlrpc. As I set out to look for an app server, I wanted one that would allow code changes without restarting the process(es) and one that is non-blocking. I co

Re: [Webware-discuss] webware as general app server for web/xmlrpc/soap ?

2004-03-25 Thread Jason Hildebrand
On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 22:53, Randall Smith wrote: > So I ponder. Why isn't Webware more aggressive as a general > webservices > app server. Is there a SOAP implementation? Would it be difficult > to > create one? I think it should be quite straightforward -- there are (several?) soap impleme

Re: [Webware-discuss] webware as general app server for web/xmlrpc/soap ?

2004-03-25 Thread Daniel Newby
Randall Smith wrote: Being able to reload modules with the server running means more uptime. Webware can also watch mtimes on the files to reload them when they are changed. Somebody correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't this have races that can lead to devious non-reproducible bugs? IMHO a few

[Webware-discuss] webware as general app server for web/xmlrpc/soap ?

2004-03-24 Thread Randall Smith
I am working on a project in which I have chosen to use xmlrpc. As I set out to look for an app server, I wanted one that would allow code changes without restarting the process(es) and one that is non-blocking. I considered building my own from the Python standard library, and I considered t