On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 01:16:03PM +0100, Rickard wrote:
> There are some class/method caches, but that should be all. We've tried
> to avoid caching of objects/actions, since that should not be needed
> with modern VM's.
OK.
> Can you create a minimal test-case? Can you avoid other possible c
>
>On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 01:41:40PM +0100, Christoph Sturm wrote:
> > MH> I'm running Orion.
> >
>
Actually you said Orion + Sitemesh hmm.. unless you're using the latest
CVS, you have just spelled a formula for memory disaster. There was a HUGE
HUGE HUGE memory leak every time a page wa
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 01:41:40PM +0100, Christoph Sturm wrote:
> MH> I'm running Orion.
>
> Are you using cmp? I found that orion produces memory leaks with some
> jdbc drivers. I think it only closes Connections, but not the related
> Result Sets. Some jdbc drivers destroy the result sets when
Hello Markus,
Friday, February 01, 2002, 1:13:31 PM, you wrote:
MH> But now I've run into serious problems. The application seemed to work
MH> fine for a while at first, but now it's experiencing serious memory
MH> problems. Fatal ones. It's eating memory - in fact, all memory - which
MH> halts t
Markus Holmberg wrote:
> Does WebWork have any caches? (Prohibiting garbage collection of
> application specific objects, which in this case can contain large
> amounts of data)
There are some class/method caches, but that should be all. We've tried
to avoid caching of objects/actions, since t
Recently I reimplemented a relatively complex application. In this
reimplementation, I used (among other new components) WebWork.
The previous implementation was speedy, but at the cost of
architecture. It consisted mainly of JSP (with embedded Java code) and
additional Java classes communicating
Hello Victor,
Thursday, January 31, 2002, 8:19:44 PM, you wrote:
VS> GenericValidator.validate(this,formName,getLocale());
VS> This simple call will validate your form according to your formproc form
VS> definition based on the formName you specify. Upon returning, if there was
VS> an error,
Victor Salaman wrote:
> formproc has the concept of defining a form in an xml file, so I created
> a GenericValidator class that can be invoked from any action that
> extends ActionSupport, like this.. inside your doValidation() just have
> a single line:
>
> GenericValidator.validate(this,fo
Is'nt this the wrong order? Should'nt WebWork first try to use the
appropriate setters and getters and only directly access parameters, if
those methods don't exist?
Ralf
Toby Hede wrote:
> I think I have sorted my parameter issues, and because this is
> probably documented somewhere I feel
