>> Great stuff - I think there's a lot of cool things WW can do to become an
>> uber-command framework.
>
> Yup, but what? What is missing?
It would be cool to have a simple ActionExecutor? Something like:
ActionExecutor.execute("actionName", paramsMap);
Then of course you could have asynchr
>> PS Does anyone else use WW without the web? (ie as a generic command pattern
>> framework?) I think there are a lot of improvements we could make in this
>> area.
>
> I've implemented a basic RMI framework for our content management
> product using it, and the ClientServletDispatcher. Trivial
Francisco,
Good point - I actually patched this a while ago locally and forgot to
commit it. But now I can't find the patch.
I think there were two problems, one is that ActionContext.getContext()
returns null (can't remember why) and the other is that
ParametersActionFactoryProxy tries to set t
Hey guys,
Just to let you know we migrated all the data from the WW JIRA to the
OpenSymphony JIRA today.
If you had an account and did something, it still exists (but you will need
to reset your password). If you didn't do anything, you'll need to sign up
again.
You can now access all the webwo
IMHO it should all just go to the os-ww list - and if it's too much, we can
think about splitting it.
Looking back at the archives for the past few weeks (I have both ww-devel
and ww-user filtered into the same folder) - there's rarely more than 5
messages a day to _both_ lists (and often cross p
Ok - so if you're on this list you probably don't need convincing, but I
should post it anyway :)
http://radio.weblogs.com/0107789/stories/2002/07/09/whyILikeWebwork.html
Enjoy.
-mike
--
ATLASSIAN - http://www.atlassian.com
Expert J2EE Software, Services and Support
---
I'm not sure about WL7.0 - but we have been talking to BEA for a week now
about the bug in 6.1sp2 that prevents SiteMesh from working (at all). BEA
recently sent us a patch which seems to fix that bug (although it may have
revealed another one). The fix should be in sp3.
Again, I'm not sure about
t;>
>> I've downloaded Resin and am seeing the error. I'll
> get
>> this fixed. Thanks Mike.
>>
>> On Thu, 23 May 2002, Mike Cannon-Brookes wrote
>>
>>>
>>> I get a lot of NullPointerExceptions at the moment -
>> like 68 of
&g
I get a lot of NullPointerExceptions at the moment - like 68 of
PropertyTag.java.
Investigating (and trying to patch) now - but just thought I'd ask. Surely
someone is using WW on Resin out there? ;)
Cheers,
Mike
Mike Cannon-Brookes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ATLASSIAN - Your J2EE Expert Pa
om/content/atlassian/howto/orionproperties.jsp
Cheers,
Mike
Mike Cannon-Brookes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ATLASSIAN - Your J2EE Expert Partner
> Brilliant Software - http://www.atlassian.com/software
> Legendary Services - http://www.atlassian.com/sup
I have to say that JIRA runs perfectly on Orion - and uses almost every
webwork tag.
Is there a specific tag that breaks?
Are you running Orion with the jsp.reuse.rags flag off?
Cheers,
Mike
rebelutionary - http://radio.weblogs.com/0107789
"You know it makes sense - Java, J2EE, OSX, more..."
O
+1
Extra filters just make it harder for users to setup! KISS :)
-mike
On 20/5/02 10:05 AM, "Matt Baldree" ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) penned the words:
> I assume you mean moving the filter logic in the ServletDispatcher and wrap
> the request there. I'll take a look.
>
> -Matt
>
> - Original M
e attachfile.jsp is the JSP which it is uploaded from,
I'm not sure if you need this or not. Just has a basic multipart form and a
tag.
This should give you a good start. Perhaps best to turn the AttachFile
action into a file upload example action?
Hope this helps - let me know if
On 6/5/02 7:21 AM, "Matt Baldree" ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) penned the words:
> I have implemented escaping HTML from within WW tags. Basically, I added an
> escape property to PROPERTY tag which is used for all UI tags and thus will
> escape them as well. By default, I have PROPERTY escaping. I have a
I've discovered that the best Wizard approach so far is to:
- create a WizardAction (which has getters and setters for your beans -
which are stored in the user's session)
- each page action of the Wizard then extends the WizardAction (eg
Page2Action extends WizardAction)
- then in your actions.x
We have made some modifications - but mostly to the other tags like select
etc.
We originally used the webtable stuff, but now we've rolled our own table
management because our needs were just too complex. Writing a generic table
component is really very very hard ;)
-mike
On 27/4/02 2:25 PM,
Minor annoyance with the UI tags that took me an hour or two to track down
(I thought I was going insane or stupid not being able to work out theming -
as usual it was something simple).
The current tags include <%@ include
file="/template/standard/controlheader.jsp" %>
I think this should be <%
Why?
Why not just do something like:
my class
Then you can have different CSS classes on each page, and we don't need to
corrupt the tag library as is.
The templates given are _examples_, not production code - in almost every
situation they need to be modified IMHO.
-mike
On 18/4/02 12
On 7/4/02 8:56 PM, "Taavi Tiirik" ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) penned the words:
>>> Are there any occasions where it is *not* necessary to escape the
>>> output? I.e. should we always do it?
>>
>> There's no reason to escape it in normal HTML. It might have < or > in it
>> that you WANT to be interprett
_FANTASTIC_ idea - I've always loved the IBM redbooks!
+1 from me.
-mike
On 6/4/02 3:52 PM, "Peter Kelley" ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) penned the words:
> Has anybody ever seen the IBM Redbook documentation ? They are a
> practical guide to a software or hardware product. They usually have
> stuff lik
Might I make a suggestion that I think should go to the top of the list...
FileAttachments! AttachmentAware! FileUploadAware!
Whatever we want to call it ;)
(At the moment to do file uploads you have to use JSP or a servlet - which
is the only area of our app we can't use webwork - which stinks
Also I'd like to get more info on the ClientAction that runs over RMI. Is it
possible to build other 'remote' actions - ie SOAPAction?
-mike
On 4/4/02 1:52 PM, "Patrick Lightbody" ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) penned the
words:
> What about Swing as a view technology. I've always wanted to see that in
>
hings - like multiple selects, header rows, descriptions). Again,
waiting on 1.0 to get done before I commit any of these.
-mike
Mike Cannon-Brookes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ATLASSIAN - Your J2EE Expert Partner
the stack onto each
request dispatcher as it comes along or something.
Cheers,
Mike
Mike Cannon-Brookes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ATLASSIAN - Your J2EE Expert Partner
> Brilliant Software - http://www.atlassian.com/software
> Lege
24 matches
Mail list logo
