On Friday, October 15, 2021 at 7:46:37 PM UTC-7 Tom Keffer wrote:
> What triggered all this is that V4.6 figures out what to display on the
> basis of what's in the database. It's quite possible lots of Vantage
> stations are emitting bogus data for missing sensors, but no one ever
> bothered
What triggered all this is that V4.6 figures out what to display on the
basis of what's in the database. It's quite possible lots of Vantage
stations are emitting bogus data for missing sensors, but no one ever
bothered to plot it. I'll have to check my own database when I get home.
On Fri, Oct
Yes, I think I'd replace the Davis completely, the next thing will go bad
is the super cap in the ISS so another decision time. I already have a
spare Accurite on the shelf. All good points about the SDR implementation.
I'm not sure about faulty hardware. I don't recall every seeing the
On Saturday, 16 October 2021 at 07:07:31 UTC+10 bill.g...@gmail.com wrote:
> And another option, replace the ISS.
>
Yes, but given that ISS data is clearly getting to the console/logger (the
loop packets are fine) and since the logger is solely responsible for
constructing the hardware
And another option, replace the ISS. But the SDR method might be some
interesting fun. I have a lot of money invested in the Davis console and
their premium logger accessory.;
I followed your recommendation. Corrections set to none for those values
that are bogus.
I'm puzzled why this is
Thank you so much for your exhaustive and informative analysis. I like
using StdCalibrate/corrections method. I'll set that up now and clear the
database etc.
I think one final suggestion would be to make an update to the vantage
driver documenation, suggesting the same fix for sensors not
Thanks, that seems pretty conclusive. There are two archive records in the
console output you attached that contain leafTemp1 and friends, we have all
of the loop packets for each of those archive intervals and none of the
loop packets contain leafTemp1 or friends. This is consistent with the
