Re: [weewx-user] Re: new acurite bridge hardware

I'm not sure you should have pressure and barometer and altimeter all coming from barometer. The accurite should only be providing one pof the three values - and let weews derive the other two if necessary by specifying 'software'. The three values should be different values in the archive. O

Re: [weewx-user] Re: new acurite bridge hardware

I may need to fix that, but I think I had to do all three like this to get it to report the data to AWEKAS properly. Kevin On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 12:03 AM Andrew Milner wrote: > I'm not sure you should have pressure and barometer and altimeter all > coming from barometer. The accurite should o

[weewx-user] Re: Suggestion: Re-fill DB if sensor data is missing

No, I have 300 seconds = 5 minutes as archive interval but the WMR200 overrides it. I tried software generation but Weewx still stores every minute (I guess the HW-interval can not be overridden in weewx.conf): Nov 3 10:20:36 RPi-3B_Skalet weewx[9980]: ftpgenerator: ftp'd 33 files in 13.16 se

[weewx-user] Re: Negative rain-value. Need quality-control?

I found in older weewx.conf that there have been a rain-quality-control: *rain 0, 6, inch* Why was that removed in later versions of weewx.conf? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weewx-user" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving em

[weewx-user] Erratic upload to Wunderground

Hi All Just recently installed the latest weewx as I wanted to move my WMR200 station to a Raspberry Pi. I followed the installation steps and installation went fine and it is working. One problem I do have is uploading to Wunderground.I notice that with Rapidfire enabled my pressure informat

Re: [weewx-user] Re: help with #FTP.last file

The memory in your logger is corrupted. See the section *WeeWX generates HTML pages, but it does not update them * in the User's Guide on how to fix. -tk On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 2:14 PM Eric Gammeter wrote: > OK- Thanks Thomas

[weewx-user] Re: Suggestion: Re-fill DB if sensor data is missing

have you set the archive_interval = 300 in the [wmr200] section of weewx.conf - I do not know if you also need to specify the interval in StdArchive section or not - you possibly need it in both places. On Saturday, 3 November 2018 11:32:52 UTC+2, Per Edström wrote: > > No, I have 300 seconds

Re: [weewx-user] Re: Suggestion: Re-fill DB if sensor data is missing

You override the archive interval by switching to software record generation. (record_generation = software). If WeeWX is not doing this, there is something else wrong. Could you please show the log with debug=1, from when you start up WeeWX? It will show details of what record generation it is usi

Re: [weewx-user] Re: Negative rain-value. Need quality-control?

I don't know why. It was removed almost four years ago, before releasing v3.1.0. I'll have to check. -tk On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 2:34 AM Per Edström wrote: > I found in older weewx.conf that there have been a rain-quality-control: > > *rain 0, 6, inch* > > Why was that removed in later versions

Re: [weewx-user] Erratic upload to Wunderground

You did not post the log, but from what I can tell, you are trying to send data to the WU every 1 minute. Most likely, your WMR200 is not always emitting a pressure value during that one minute. Try using a longer archive interval, say 5 minutes. -tk On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 3:51 AM Riaan Van Wyk

[weewx-user] wee_config utility (and others) won't run

I have a reliable weewx installation on a Raspberry Pi using a Vantage Vue. And it is still working well. But, I disliked the scattered directories of the standard installation so I set up a new SD card with Raspian Stretch. I followed the setup.py installation instructions (with only a few min

Re: [weewx-user] wee_config utility (and others) won't run

The shell scans a "path" to find an executable. By default, your current directory is not in the path. This is for security reasons: it prevents you from accidentally running something in your current directory that you may have forgotten about, or downloaded. You must explicitly tell the shell th

Re: [weewx-user] wee_config utility (and others) won't run

Thanks so much. I was hoping it would be something fairly obvious to a Linux expert. >From the dark days of MS-DOS, I remember we could set 'paths' on start up so that you would not have to explicitly type in paths every time we issued a command. Is there something that I can set so that when I

Re: [weewx-user] wee_config utility (and others) won't run

By the way, free to point me to a simple tutorial on this if that would be easier for you than typing long instructions. David On Saturday, 3 November 2018 13:08:37 UTC-4, David Beach wrote: > > Thanks so much. I was hoping it would be something fairly obvious to a > Linux expert. > > From the

Re: [weewx-user] Tendency of the moon: increasing or decreasing

Hey and thanks for your answer. You understood it correctly. I will check your solution on monday. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weewx-user" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to weewx-user+uns

Re: [weewx-user] wee_config utility (and others) won't run

Google is your friend: https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/26047/how-to-correctly-add-a-path-to-path On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 10:30 AM David Beach wrote: > By the way, free to point me to a simple tutorial on this if that would be > easier for you than typing long instructions. > > David >

Re: [weewx-user] Re: Negative rain-value. Need quality-control?

Asking around, none of us know why it was removed. Seems like it would be a good idea to add it back in. -tk On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 6:53 AM Thomas Keffer wrote: > I don't know why. It was removed almost four years ago, before releasing > v3.1.0. I'll have to check. > > -tk > > On Sat, Nov 3, 20

Re: [weewx-user] Re: Negative rain-value. Need quality-control?

OK, back in with commit e9d36e , to appear in v3.9.0. -tk On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 12:20 PM Thomas Keffer wrote: > Asking around, none of us know why it was removed. Seems like it would be > a good idea to add it back

Re: [weewx-user] wee_config utility (and others) won't run

On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 10:30:01 AM UTC-7, David Beach wrote: > > By the way, free to point me to a simple tutorial on this if that would be > easier for you than typing long instructions. > > Better yet - get yourself some real linux training (for free) rather than hunting and pecking a

Re: [weewx-user] wee_config utility (and others) won't run

On Sat, 3 Nov 2018 10:08:36 -0700 (PDT) David Beach wrote: > Thanks so much. I was hoping it would be something fairly obvious to > a Linux expert. > > From the dark days of MS-DOS, I remember we could set 'paths' on > start up so that you would not have to explicitly type in paths every > time

Re: [weewx-user] wee_config utility (and others) won't run

Thanks for that reference. With the TechRepublic article to get me started then the StackExchange one to tell me why they thought I should put the PATH reference into /.profile, I understood much better what was going on. And now my PATH has the correct addition. And even better, I also got nginx s