Re: [weewx-user] Re: New GW1000 Driver available for testing

I have released v0.1.0b8 on Github which: - fixes an incorrect mapping of GW1000 field relbarometer that will have resulted in incorrect barometer and altimeter fields in WeeWX - changes default field mappings of GW1000 fields rainhour, rainday,

Re: [weewx-user] Re: New GW1000 Driver available for testing

Thanks for the input Paul, I believe your are correct. As soon as you see Rel Offset being calculated as an altitude only offset it is pretty clear it is altimeter and that means the pressure you are offsetting from must be pressure. I am not sure why I put down barometer, perhaps it was the li

Re: [weewx-user] FTP Stopped Working After Updating Station Hardware

As instructed... On Tuesday, July 28, 2020 at 6:05:15 PM UTC-5, Tom Keffer wrote: > > OK, seeing as how that's the only value in the database, let's start > afresh. Can you delete the database, then restart weewx? Keep debug=2. Post > the log from the restart for the first couple of report cycl

[weewx-user] Rainfall inaccuracies (using weewx-sdr)

Weewx 4.1.1, Python 3, using weewx-sdr on Raspberry PI 3 w/ sqlite database, 1min archive times, outdoor thermometer is an Acurite 5n1. We've had quite a bit of rain recently, so it's given me several opportunities to notice that the Acurite app rainfall numbers vary greatly with Weewx. Given

Re: [weewx-user] Re: New GW1000 Driver available for testing

Should we map 'altimeter': 'relbarometer' ? Gw1000 produces 2 pressure readings: As defined by Ecowitt Calibration of barometric pressure settings *Absolute Pressure* "Absolute barometric pressure, can be calibrated at manufacturing time by comparing with a

[weewx-user] default_field_map 'barometer': 'relbarometer' SHOULD BE altimeter': 'relbarometer'

Gw1000 produces 2 pressure readings: As defined by Ecowitt Calibration of barometric pressure settings *Absolute Pressure* "Absolute barometric pressure, can be calibrated at manufacturing time by comparing with a precise instrument that measures pressure at

Re: [weewx-user] Re: wind chill for Vantage Pro 2

> > On a side note, when I tried running weewx directly without a config file > argument, it would not run, even though my config file is located at > /etc/weewx/weewx.conf. Is that a bug? > No, but it suggests that you may not be editing the weewx.conf file that weewxd is actually using. At this

Re: [weewx-user] Re: wind chill for Vantage Pro 2

OK, I tried stopping the daemon and running directly. The LOOP data shows no difference between outTemp and windchill although the console shows a 4 degree difference. I have attached my conf file in case I messed up something. I see that when the change to support LOOP2 was submitted, a reques

Re: [weewx-user] Re: New GW1000 Driver available for testing

> Not sure why you think ‘uvi’ is mapped to ‘uv’, it is and always has been > mapped to ‘UV’. i misread the code and thought the case was wrong (it isn’t). i blame my spectacles. cheers -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weewx-user" group. To unsubsc

Re: [weewx-user] Re: New GW1000 Driver available for testing

I must admit that I only looked at the wview-extended schema when developing the default field map and did not consider weewx.units.obs_group_dict, though it makes sense to use weewx.units.obs_group_dict where possible. Will change the default mapping for the three rain fields as suggested. Not

Re: [weewx-user] Re: New GW1000 Driver available for testing

i expect my new GW1000 (to augment my vp2) to arrive monday so have started planning… looking at gw1000 driver default_field_map, there seem to be a few mislabelled mappings into wview_extended.schema and weewx.units.obs_group_dict, they should be: gw1000 → weewx rainday → dayRain