Re: FW: [Wengophone-devel] Performance Issue

2006-12-19 Thread Aurélien Gâteau
Lukas Oberhuber wrote: Aurelien, I now see what you are saying. Yes, that does look more elegant. I will try to implement (of course for me now it requires unwinding all the patch code so I might tackle a little later). I understand :-/ As far as base64 is concerned, I had a look at it but I

RE: FW: [Wengophone-devel] Performance Issue

2006-12-19 Thread Lukas Oberhuber
] Sent: 19 December 2006 09:47 To: Lukas Oberhuber Cc: 'Jérôme WAGNER'; wengophone-devel@lists.openwengo.com Subject: Re: FW: [Wengophone-devel] Performance Issue Lukas Oberhuber wrote: > Arelien, > > The patch I attached in the previous message already does what you sugg

Re: FW: [Wengophone-devel] Performance Issue

2006-12-19 Thread Aurélien Gâteau
Lukas Oberhuber wrote: Arelien, The patch I attached in the previous message already does what you suggest. I was mostly explaining what I had done, but I guess I didn't make that clear enough. Yes, it does. But I believe my solution is a bit nicer because it does not require adding another p

RE: FW: [Wengophone-devel] Performance Issue

2006-12-18 Thread Lukas Oberhuber
tions. -Lukas Lukas Oberhuber -Original Message- From: Aurélien Gâteau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 December 2006 09:56 To: Lukas Oberhuber Cc: 'Jérôme WAGNER'; wengophone-devel@lists.openwengo.com Subject: Re: FW: [Wengophone-devel] Performance Issue Lukas

Re: FW: [Wengophone-devel] Performance Issue

2006-12-18 Thread Aurélien Gâteau
Lukas Oberhuber wrote: Resending this email, as I’m not sure it got though (no response from anyone). Jerome, let me know if you see it. I must confess I let this one pass through as I didn't feel experienced enough to answer at the time you send it... Here is my opinion: Instead of overload