On Monday 30 October 2006 09:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: rusty
> Date: Mon Oct 30 09:47:51 2006
> New Revision: 14115
>
> URL: http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/wesnoth?rev=14115&view=rev
> Log:
> Revert r14010: it causes OOS with 1.11. We cannot introduce such changes
> during the freeze, sor
Hi everybody!
We have been in the state of having the first rc for some time now. Now
I wanted to ask you about your opinion on some kind of time schedule.
There were quite many (code) changes in the last time. So we definitely
should have a new rc very soon. As long as we are in the state of r
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 11:07 +0100, Nils Kneuper wrote:
> Hi everybody!
> We have been in the state of having the first rc for some time now. Now
> I wanted to ask you about your opinion on some kind of time schedule.
> There were quite many (code) changes in the last time. So we definitely
> sho
Am Montag 30 Oktober 2006 11:40 schrieb Rusty Russell:
> > 3) Any ideas if the performance improvements have a *real* chance to be
> > completed soon so that we should wait for them to release 1.2?
> I doubt it. The ones I've seen are all non-trivial, and would take one
> release to check them alo
On Monday 30 October 2006 11:40, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > Or could we maybe release 1.2 stable next week? It would be really nice
> > to have a list with estimates on how long you will need to complete your
> > tasks. If we know that it will take defintaly more than X weeks we might
> > decide to (
