ott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 08:04:25AM -0400, esr wrote:
> > After IRC discussion with several devs (including the release manager)
> > we've made a tentative decision to bring Son Of The Black Eye into
> > mainline next. The campaign has Taurus as an active maintainer.
>
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 08:04:25AM -0400, esr wrote:
> After IRC discussion with several devs (including the release manager)
> we've made a tentative decision to bring Son Of The Black Eye into
> mainline next. The campaign has Taurus as an active maintainer.
Great, and good luck to Taurus. I
After IRC discussion with several devs (including the release manager)
we've made a tentative decision to bring Son Of The Black Eye into
mainline next. The campaign has Taurus as an active maintainer.
Tentative here equals "we're going to do it unless somebody raises
a substantive objection wit
I pinged Taurus. He says he'll join the dev list.
The biggest remaining NR issue is the portrait of Abhai, one of the
hero characters. Jetryl is working on it. I believe the balancing
has been done; logic, maps, and storyline are good enough to ship.
Taurus also says he believes SoTBE is in
On Wednesday, 2 May 2007, Joseph Simmons wrote:
> So, in conclusion:
>
> * The only differences are that it is not Garard I, in 417 YW, who
> originally commissions the Sceptre, but rather Haldric II, in 25 YW, who
> does so, and that its completion only takes 15 years, not 25.
> * These are both m
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The a broader continuity is more valuable than
> an unchanging HttT.
While I agree with this, a minor note of caution: we probably don't want
to casually make *major* continuity changes to campaigns, either. especially
not one as central as HttT. That too
