On Sunday 22 February 2009, Sergey Popov wrote:
На Sun, 22 Feb 2009 22:52:55 +0100
Alexander Neundorf neund...@kde.org wrote:
Thanks for your contructive attitude.
What is wrong with using a DSL for a very specific purpose ?
I don't think that cmake's language is a DSL, at least compared
On Monday 23 February 2009, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Sunday 22 February 2009, Sergey Popov wrote:
На Sun, 22 Feb 2009 22:52:55 +0100
Alexander Neundorf neund...@kde.org wrote:
Thanks for your contructive attitude.
What is wrong with using a DSL for a very specific purpose ?
I
Hi,
On Sunday 22 February 2009, Sergey Popov wrote:
На Sun, 22 Feb 2009 14:28:03 +0100
Mark de Wever ko...@xs4all.nl записано:
Cmake also supports to make project files for MSVC and CodeBlocks, it
would be nice to get some feedback on how good these project files are.
If we can make
On Sunday 22 February 2009, Mark de Wever wrote:
...
* Cmake; mog implemented the cmake build system and went MIA afterwards,
which means cmake has no real maintainer. It seems to work mostly but is
in need of some love.
At FOSDEM there were at least two Wesnoth developers who really
On Sunday 22 February 2009, Sergey Popov wrote:
На Sun, 22 Feb 2009 19:57:29 +0100
Alexander Neundorf neund...@kde.org wrote:
There shouldn't be useless targets. Which ones do you consider useless
?
none of which are Debug or Release,
It is still based on Makefiles
On Thursday 22 January 2009, Greg Copeland wrote:
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 22:04 +0100, Mark de Wever wrote:
If you claim that Python/C API is faster as boost or SWIG, please post
some benchmarks to backup those claims. I don't buy those claims without
a benchmark.
I can not speak to the
On Friday 02 January 2009, Mark de Wever wrote:
...
The main reason to hesitate before moving core code to Python is that
it will require Wesnoth developers to know two languages before
working on the code. I do not view this as a major problem, as Python
is much easier to pick up than
On Thursday 24 July 2008, Nicolas Grunbaum wrote:
I have been profiling Wesnoth with Shark and Instruments on OS 10.5,
the results which still need a bit of mining and statistical analysis
show that Wesnoth spends a majority of its time ( ~ 85% ) in the
graphics and audio routines, a large
On Wednesday 26 March 2008, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
Most of you are aware that our autotools setup has reached a point
of unmaintainability at which Ivanovic and I believe we need to
change our build system to something (anything!) else. Additionally,
we'd like to be able to use the same build
On Monday 25 February 2008, Nils Kneuper wrote:
...
- new build system
Post 1.4 esr and I will work on switching the build system from autotools
to something better. At the moment it is not sure which build system will
be used, the basic two alternatives are scons and cmake. There was a talk
On Thursday 21 February 2008, Nils Kneuper wrote:
...
I do at least plan to release rc2 at the end of FOSDEM and to have a look
at the two options I currently see as an autotools replacement.
This looks like the perfect location for that. Both the scons and the cmake
lead developers will be
On Wednesday 13 February 2008, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
Alexander Neundorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
A bigger one is that I think the two-level design -- cmake making
makefiles -- must inevitably have many of the same fundamental
weaknesses as autotools, Imake, and other makefile-generator
Hi,
On Monday 11 February 2008, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
Alexander Neundorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I would even prefer if you ask before you decide for one or the other :-)
The blog you referenced consisted of mostly anchorless rants, which I
already replied to each of his points.
I'd happily
On Friday 08 February 2008, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
Alexander Neundorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I noticed that you are discussing using CMake for Wesnoth (which would be
great), and since as far as I have seen you have open questions and
concerns regarding CMake, I'd like to help with that. I'm
Hi,
I noticed that you are discussing using CMake for Wesnoth (which would be
great), and since as far as I have seen you have open questions and concerns
regarding CMake, I'd like to help with that. I'm maintaining the CMake based
buildsystem of KDE4 since 2006 and since last year I am also
15 matches
Mail list logo
