Sorry for this. I didn't notice that CCing the group will cause such
trouble. I will bring it off it. Thanks.
> Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2001 19:16:08 -0500
> From: David VanHorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Mengmeng Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Bao, Jiangcheng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 07:11 PM 8/4/01 -0500, Mengmeng Zhang wrote:
> > Say, I have a index.html which is not changed, but some of the pages
> > linked from this page might be changed. When I use -N option to retrieve
> > index.html recursively, wget will quit after find out that index.html is
> > not changed, withou
> Say, I have a index.html which is not changed, but some of the pages
> linked from this page might be changed. When I use -N option to retrieve
> index.html recursively, wget will quit after find out that index.html is
> not changed, without following the url in index.html, and thus missed the
>
Hi, Thanks for your reply!
Say, I have a index.html which is not changed, but some of the pages
linked from this page might be changed. When I use -N option to retrieve
index.html recursively, wget will quit after find out that index.html is
not changed, without following the url in index.html, a
On 4 Aug 2001, at 3:25, Bao, Jiangcheng wrote:
> Suppose I have page a.html, which has a link to b.html. If a is not
> changed, and b is changed. When I process a, I have no way to check a so
> that I can process b too, without downloading a. -N will cause a not to be
> downloaded, but not proces
Suppose I have page a.html, which has a link to b.html. If a is not
changed, and b is changed. When I process a, I have no way to check a so
that I can process b too, without downloading a. -N will cause a not to be
downloaded, but not processed either, so change of b will be ignored. If I
will -
On Fri, 3 Aug 2001 15:14:42 +0100, Ian Abbott wrote:
>On 2 Aug 2001, at 23:38, AARC Distributors, Inc. wrote:
>
>> At least block attachments to the list. Anyone needing to send
>> a file to another can do so by direct e-mail. This will stop the virus
>> attachments.
>
>That would also b
