wget info page

2002-02-20 Thread Noel Koethe
Hello, wget 1.8.1 is shipped with the files in doc/ wget.info wget.info-1 wget.info-2 wget.info-3 wget.info-4 They are build out of wget.texi if I remove them and makeinfo is installed. The files are removed when runing make realclean. I think they should/could also removed when runing make

wget 1.8.1: po/el.po update

2002-02-20 Thread ta_panta_rei
Dear wget developers, I translated the few remaining messages in the greek po file. Here are the diffs. Thanks for writing and maintaining such a great tool. - J --- wget-el.po.orig Wed Feb 20 14:02:40 2002 +++ wget-el.po Wed Feb 20 14:12:25 2002 @@ -6,16 +6,16 @@ msgstr

Re: wget 1.8.1: po/el.po update

2002-02-20 Thread Karl Eichwalder
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I translated the few remaining messages in the greek po file. Here are the diffs. Please, try to get in contact with the last translator (cf. the Cc:) to avoid duplicate work. Thanks a lot! Thanks for writing and maintaining such a great tool. -- Linux frechet

Re: wget info page

2002-02-20 Thread Ian Abbott
On 20 Feb 2002 at 12:54, Noel Koethe wrote: wget 1.8.1 is shipped with the files in doc/ wget.info wget.info-1 wget.info-2 wget.info-3 wget.info-4 They are build out of wget.texi if I remove them and makeinfo is installed. The files are removed when runing make realclean. I think

No clobber and .shtml files

2002-02-20 Thread Ian Abbott
Here is a patch for a potential feature change. I'm not sending it to the wget-patches list yet, as I'm not sure if it should be applied as is, or at all. The feature change is a minor amendment to the (bogus) test for whether an existing local copy of a file is text/html when the or not when

Timeout Bug

2002-02-20 Thread Partycrew Industries
I might be wrong but I believe there is a bug in the --timeout=whatever syntax. I just can't get the program to obey it under any circumstances, I put in an ip that i know is non-existant and it takes it forever to figure that out. I've even tried changing it in init.c with no better results.

Re: Timeout Bug

2002-02-20 Thread Alan Eldridge
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 10:20:38PM -0800, Partycrew Industries wrote: I might be wrong but I believe there is a bug in the --timeout=whatever syntax. I just can't get the program to obey it under any circumstances, I put in No, that is not a correct statement. The program obeys the timeout