How can one handle the following, where the URL is a search script? The
URL will load the base page into one's browser correctly, but when it is
used as an argument for WGET, WGET tries to use it as an output filename,
and the filename contains invalid characters for Windows. Wget 1.8.2 for
W
hello,
do wget support compression of downloaded files? This will we useful when you use -mirrot (or recursion) to preserve space.
tony
niurui wrote:
> Hi, all
>
> I want to embed wget in my program. first my program will use wget to get
a file from internet,
> then it will search this file for some words. So i want to save that file
in memory rather than
> on hard disk.
>
> Can wget save the file in memory? how to?
Wget is totall
Hi, all
I want to embed wget in my program. first my program will use wget to get a file from
internet, then it will search this file for some words. So i want to save that file in
memory rather than on hard disk.
Can wget save the file in memory? how to?
Thanks in advance for any help.
XiaoN
George Prekas wrote:
> I have found a bug in Wget version 1.8.2 concerning comment handling (
). Take a look at the following illegal HTML code:
>
>
> test1.html
>
>
>
>
> Now, save the above snippet as test.html and try wget -Fi test.html. You
> will notice that it doesn't recognise the se
Hi!
I want to archive a webcam image every 5 minutes or so, and when I go: "wget
http//server/cam_1.jpg" so it saves "cam_1.jpg". The trouble is it saves the
next time as "cam_1.jpg.1" and "cam_1.jpg.2" etc.
Is there a switch that I can use for it to name it thusly:
cam_1.jpg
cam_11.jpg
cam_12.j
On Fri, 30 May 2003, George Prekas wrote:
> I have found a bug in Wget version 1.8.2 concerning comment handling ( ). Take a look at the following illegal HTML code:
>
>
> test1.html
>
>
>
>
> Now, save the above snippet as test.html and try wget -Fi test.html. You
> will notice that it does
I have found a bug in Wget version 1.8.2 concerning comment handling ( ). Take a look at the following illegal HTML code:
test1.html
Now, save the above snippet as test.html and try wget -Fi test.html. You
will notice that it doesn't recognise the second link. I have found a
solution to the
I appear to have found a bug in wget 1.8.2, and I couldn't find any references
to it via google. Is this a real bug? I have trouble believing it can't have
been hit before; but on the other hand, I can't figure out any reason why it
should be occuring to me.
If I use "wget -r http://myhost.com/";