Simone Piunno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Monday 21 February 2005 16:18, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
>
>> Also, gettext doesn't change behavior of low-level routines in a
>> fundamental way -- it's just a way of getting different strings.
>> On the other hand, wide chars do introduce pretty invasive
On Monday 21 February 2005 16:18, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> Also, gettext doesn't change behavior of low-level
> routines in a fundamental way -- it's just a way of getting different
> strings. On the other hand, wide chars do introduce pretty invasive
> changes to the way things work. The most bas
Mauro Tortonesi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i don't know what's the correct procedure to add a new translation
> to a GNU project (hrvoje, do you have any ideas?),
I used to add translations for Croatian, both for Wget and for other
programs, so I should know, but I must admit that the details
Mauro Tortonesi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> If that weren't safe, Wget would (along with many other programs) have
>> been broken a long time ago. In fact, if that were the case, I would
>> never have even accepted adding support for gettext in the first
>> place.
>
> well, theoretically it co
On Monday 21 February 2005 04:23 pm, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> Mauro Tortonesi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> The only reason why that bug occurred was the broken "hotfix" that
> >> escaped *all* non-ASCII content printed by Wget, instead of only that
> >> actually read from the network. We don't ne
On Monday 21 February 2005 01:27 pm, you wrote:
> On Sunday 20 February 2005 22:47, NoÃl KÃthe wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, den 09.02.2005, 10:40 +0200 schrieb Nick Shaforostoff:
> > > hi, i've translated wget.1 to Russian
> > > what should i do to get it added to the official wget distro?
> >
> > Just
Mauro Tortonesi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The only reason why that bug occurred was the broken "hotfix" that
>> escaped *all* non-ASCII content printed by Wget, instead of only that
>> actually read from the network. We don't need iconv to fix that, we
>> need correct quoting.
>
> yes, you ma
On Monday 21 February 2005 03:57 pm, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> Mauro Tortonesi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > but i suspect we wiil probably have to add foreign charset support
> > to wget one of these days. for example, suppose we are doing a
> > recursive HTTP retrieval and the HTML pages we retrie
On Monday 21 February 2005 02:37 pm, you wrote:
> Mauro Tortonesi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> It is rather common that either the charset at the remote host or
> >> the charset at the local host are set incorrectly.
> >
> > this is not a problem. actually (apart from the case of a document
> >
Mauro Tortonesi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> but i suspect we wiil probably have to add foreign charset support
> to wget one of these days. for example, suppose we are doing a
> recursive HTTP retrieval and the HTML pages we retrieve are not
> encoded in ASCII but in UTF16 (an encoding in which
On Monday 21 February 2005 02:39 pm, you wrote:
> Mauro Tortonesi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > the problem is not with HTTP response messages, but with HTTP
> > resources (which can be for example binary data or multibyte char
> > text - in this case you really want to escape unprintable data wh
Mauro Tortonesi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> the problem is not with HTTP response messages, but with HTTP
> resources (which can be for example binary data or multibyte char
> text - in this case you really want to escape unprintable data while
> printing all the valid multibyte chars you can us
Mauro Tortonesi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> It is rather common that either the charset at the remote host or
>> the charset at the local host are set incorrectly.
>
> this is not a problem. actually (apart from the case of a document
> returned as an HTTP response) we cannot be sure that the c
On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 11:26:16 +, Jonathan Share <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 22:43:50 -0600 (CST), Steven M. Schweda
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > My best guess is that it is failing to open the tcp connection but
> > > looking for a more specific answer if possible.
>
On Monday 21 February 2005 12:35 pm, Leonid wrote:
> Mauro,
>
> I tend to agree with Hrvoje. If you decide to open the
> Pandora's box and implement iconv support, please, please,
> provide an option, preferably default one, to configure or
> use wget without iconv.
of course.
> FYI, there a
On Sunday 20 February 2005 22:47, NoÃl KÃthe wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 09.02.2005, 10:40 +0200 schrieb Nick Shaforostoff:
> > hi, i've translated wget.1 to Russian
> > what should i do to get it added to the official wget distro?
>
> Just send your ru.po or a patch/diff to the po/ru.po in the wget
Mauro,
I tend to agree with Hrvoje. If you decide to open the
Pandora's box and implement iconv support, please, please,
provide an option, preferably default one, to configure or
use wget without iconv. FYI, there are languages which actively
use more than one coding. For example, I know 14 dif
On Monday 21 February 2005 09:49 am, DraÅen KaÄar wrote:
> Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> > 2) Server messages printed by Wget in normal operation, such as the
> >"200 Ok" message. That one is printed just for the "fun factor"
> >anyway, we could as well print just the response code. However, I
>
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> > Besides, despite "sizeof(foo)" being a constant, you can't move a
> > comparison against it to cpp.
>
> You can, Autoconf allows you to "check for size of foo", which gives
> you a SIZEOF_FOO preprocessor constant. Then you can write things
> like:
>
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Besides, despite "sizeof(foo)" being a constant, you can't move a
> comparison against it to cpp.
You can, Autoconf allows you to "check for size of foo", which gives
you a SIZEOF_FOO preprocessor constant. Then you can write things
like:
#if SI
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> >> Agreed, in some cases. In others it yields to pretty annoying
> >> compiler warnings.
> >
> > What kind of warnings?
>
> Comparing constants. Unreachable code.
Broken compiler? What ends up as constants may be "computed" by cpp and
depending o
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 21 Feb 2005, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
>
>> > Actually "if (sizeof(number) == 8)" is much more readable than any
>> > preprocessor clutter and yields exactly the same.
>>
>> Agreed, in some cases. In others it yields to pretty annoying
>> comp
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> > Actually "if (sizeof(number) == 8)" is much more readable than any
> > preprocessor clutter and yields exactly the same.
>
> Agreed, in some cases. In others it yields to pretty annoying
> compiler warnings.
What kind of warnings? It's valid C.
From: Hrvoje Niksic
> [...] It is no small task to study Info-ZIP's source
> code. I did plan to look at it later, but at the time it was quicker
> to just ask.
It's fairly easy to "SEARCH [...]*.c, *.h LARGE_FILE_SUPPORT" (or
your local find/grep equivalent). Locating "zip_fzofft" would al
>They (we?) are more VMS-friendly, too. (But you're welcome to visit
> http://antinode.org/docs/dec/sw/wget.html and glean what you can.)
Oops. Bad copy-paste. Sorry. That should have been:
http://antinode.org/dec/sw/wget.html
Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> 2) Server messages printed by Wget in normal operation, such as the
>"200 Ok" message. That one is printed just for the "fun factor"
>anyway, we could as well print just the response code. However, I
>don't see a problem with simply filtering out the non-ASCII'
Hello all,
Would it be possible to specify minimum size for files
to retrieve?
Please add me in the CC list of your replies as I'm
not a subscriber.
Thanks,
Baptiste
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
http:/
Hello all,
Would it be possible to specify minimum size for files
to retrieve?
Please add me in the CC list of your replies as I'm
not a subscriber.
Thanks,
Baptiste
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
Hello all,
Would it be possible to specify minimum size for files
to retrieve?
Please add me in the CC list of your replies as I'm
not a subscriber.
Thanks,
Baptiste
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn
Simone Piunno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think by pushing this line of reasoning to the extreme you
> shouldn't have added i18n through gettext, should you?
You are right, and I was indeed leery of adding support for gettext
until I was convinced that it would work well both on systems witho
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually "if (sizeof(number) == 8)" is much more readable than any
> preprocessor clutter and yields exactly the same.
Agreed, in some cases. In others it yields to pretty annoying
compiler warnings.
On Monday 21 February 2005 12:29, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> >> string_t.c uses the function iswblank, which doesn't seem to exist
> Please don't do that. Interface and behavior of iconv change tends to
> vary greatly between systems and their versions. Also, "wide
> character" support is still mis
Hi Philipp!
http://wget.sunsite.dk/#mailinglists
says you (=you personally) have to write an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
to become unsubscribed.
For this, you must
a) know which list you are subscribed to
b) know with which email address you are subscribed
CU
Jens
PS: I am getting NO spam or vi
On Sun, 20 Feb 2005, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> >> > 1. I'd say that code like "if ( sizeof(number) == 8 )" should have
> >> > been a compile-time #ifdef rather than a run-time decision.
> >>
> >> Where do you see such code? grep 'if.*sizeof' *.c doesn't seem to
> >> show such examples.
> >
> >
Mauro Tortonesi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sunday 20 February 2005 06:31 pm, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
>> string_t.c uses the function iswblank, which doesn't seem to exist
>> on Solaris 8 I tried to compile it on. (Compilation is likely
>> broken on other non-Linux platforms as well for the sam
35 matches
Mail list logo
