Oh wait. Somebody already did the patch!
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg09502.html
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.wget.patches/1867
I guess it's up to maintainers to decide whether to include this in
the standard wget distribution. In the meantime, hearty thanks to Ted
Hi Tony,
> Amazingly I found this feature request in a 2003 message to this very
mailing
> list. Are there only a few lunatics like me who think this should be
included?
Wget is written and maintained by volunteers. What you need to find is a
lunatic willing to volunteer to write the code to su
J.F.Groff wrote:
> Amazingly I found this feature request in a 2003 message to this very
mailing
> list. Are there only a few lunatics like me who think this should be
included?
Wget is written and maintained by volunteers. What you need to find is a
lunatic willing to volunteer to write the code
Neil wrote:
> When giving it some thought I think a
> valid argument could be made that the string in the CSS document is not
> exactly
> an URL but it is certainly URL-like.
The "URL-like strings" in CSS are actually standard URLs, either absolute or
relative, so they shouldn't be a big deal to
From: Neil Smithline [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2007 9:44 PM
To: Tony Lewis
Subject: Re: think you have a bug in CSS processing
Oh - well if you don't support CSS processing then I guess I am making a new
request. I'm also suggesting a clarificati
I think I found a bug in CSS processing. This was auto-generated and I'm far
from a CSS expert (quite the opposite). But, as far as I can tell (see
snippet below), it is supposed to be loaded from a directory named "-" that
is off of the main URL. For example, if the origination site is
http://www