On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 13:05:10 +0600, Lachlan Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I aware that there are many implementations of ogg available, but
>>> Windows Media Player, Quick Time and Real Player don't.
>> http://www.illiminable.com/ogg/
>> http://xiph.org/quicktime/
>> https://helixcommunity.
Charles Iliya Krempeaux wrote:
On 10/30/06, Lachlan Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Places like YouTube and Google Video work around this by
building their own interface using Flash, which handles multiple formats
seamlessly for the user.
Not exactly. Flash players only play FLV video files.
Hello,On 10/30/06, Lachlan Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ian Hickson wrote:> On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Charles Iliya Krempeaux wrote:>> Would you be open to hearing suggestions about how to add native video>> and video player support?>> Sure. FWIW, there's a lot of interest in browser vendors about in
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Charles Iliya Krempeaux wrote:
Would you be open to hearing suggestions about how to add native video
and video player support?
Sure. FWIW, there's a lot of interest in browser vendors about introducing
a element or some such (or maybe making browsers
Charles Iliya Krempeaux wrote:
http://lachy.id.au/log/2006/10/fixing-html
That link doesn't work. (I get a 404.)
Fixed, thanks. There seems to ge a bug WordPress that causes posts to
get marked as private for some unknown reason.
--
Lachlan Hunt
http://lachy.id.au/
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 03:01:47 +0600, Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Embed doesn't provide a fallback mechanism, and mixing parameters to the
>> plugin, and attributes can be error prone, depending on the plugin,
>> while object makes use of param.
> Sure but, everyone uses , and doesn'
Hello Lachlan,On 10/30/06, Lachlan Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ian Hickson wrote:> Joe Clark wrote:>> http://blog.fawny.org/2006/10/28/tbl-html/FYI, my response to that his here.
http://lachy.id.au/log/2006/10/fixing-htmlThat link doesn't work. (I get a 404.)See ya-- Charles Iliya Krempeau
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 06:04:40 +0600, Douglas Crockford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been looking at the mashup problem. All scripts run with the authority
> of the base page, so mashups are not indicated for any application containing
> private data or managing a private connection. That is
Ian Hickson wrote:
Joe Clark wrote:
http://blog.fawny.org/2006/10/28/tbl-html/
FYI, my response to that his here.
http://lachy.id.au/log/2006/10/fixing-html
* Allow multiple uses of the same id/label in a form and suddenly it
becomes possible to mark up multiple-choice questionnaires a
Hello,On 10/30/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,On 10/30/06, Ian Hickson <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Charles Iliya Krempeaux wrote:>> Would you be open to hearing suggestions about how to add native video> and video player support?Sure. FWIW, ther
Hello,On 10/30/06, Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Charles Iliya Krempeaux wrote:>> Would you be open to hearing suggestions about how to add native video> and video player support?Sure. FWIW, there's a lot of interest in browser vendors about introducing
a element o
Hi,
From: Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> FWIW, apparently I'm not the only one who thinks that having as
> child of is intuitive.
Sure, it would be great. I've nothing against the idea in principle. I
just don't see how to execute it.
For backwards compatibility reasons we can't change wh
On 10/30/06, Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Charles Iliya Krempeaux wrote:
>
> Would you be open to hearing suggestions about how to add native video
> and video player support?
Sure. FWIW, there's a lot of interest in browser vendors about introducing
a element or
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Simon Pieters wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > This also happens to be backwards compatible with legacy UA's.
> >
> > Check the DOM for that markup. "Backwards compatible" is not the words
> > I would use...
>
> FWIW, apparentl
Lachlan Hunt wrote:
> Actually, conditionally required fields would be a very nice addition.
> I built this site earlier this year, which has conditionally required
> fields.
>
> https://www.edentiti.com/create/details.jsf
>
> See the Postal Address section. It's required unless it's the same
On Oct 30, 2006, at 2:49 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Charles Iliya Krempeaux wrote:
Would you be open to hearing suggestions about how to add native
video
and video player support?
Sure. FWIW, there's a lot of interest in browser vendors about
introducing
a element or
Hi,
I'll push a bit further on this issue. :-)
From: Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> While that is true with the constraints of HTML4, we could allow forms
to be
> direct children of in HTML5.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> This also happens to be backwards compatible with legacy UA'
I have been looking at the mashup problem. All scripts run with the authority
of the base page, so mashups are not indicated for any application containing
private data or managing a private connection. That is extremely limiting. Even
worse, it turns out that rich media ads are mashups.
I had
On 23 Oct 2006, at 12:43PM, Henri Sivonen wrote:
> Using custom schemas with the HTML parser is for experts only
> and produces very wrong results unless the schema is suitable.
Indeed so, but then any tool can potentially be misused.
Still, I do realise that this is not a priority, of course.
>
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Charles Iliya Krempeaux wrote:
>
> Would you be open to hearing suggestions about how to add native video
> and video player support?
Sure. FWIW, there's a lot of interest in browser vendors about introducing
a element or some such (or maybe making browsers natively suppor
Joe Clark wrote:
> http://blog.fawny.org/2006/10/28/tbl-html/
>
> This is a classic problem in HTML development: The people doing the work
> are geeks with computer-science interests who do not understand, for
> example, newspapers, or screenplays, or, really, print publishing in
> gener
Hello,On 10/30/06, Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey Joe,Joe Clark wrote:> http://blog.fawny.org/2006/10/28/tbl-html/[...]
> This is a classic problem in HTML development: The people doing the work> are geeks with computer-science interests who do not understand, for> example, newspapers,
>> >The use of proprietary mechanisms (mostly ActiveX controls) for
>> >digital signatures is common in Korean sites as well, including
>> >Korean government sites.
>> That's right. They sure are proprietary; I was not even able to get
>> the Korean e-goverment signature spec since it is "secret"!
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Joao Eiras wrote:
> > >
> > > Browsers will continue to suport embed, but the recomendations
> > > shouldn't.
> >
> > Why not?
>
> Embed doesn't provide a fallback mechanism, and mixing parameters to the
> plugin, and attributes can be error prone, depending on the plugin,
Na , Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Joao Eiras wrote:
Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> > * Make embed legal. Give it up, people: object doesn't work and
never
> > will.
> HTML5 will make legal.
Object works pretty fine. embed is duplicate
On Sun, 29 Oct 2006, Henri Sivonen wrote:
> >
> > Due in no small part to WHAT WG�s leadership by a strict standardista
>
> Well, the leadership applies different kind of strictness to the
> tokenizer/DOM level and to semantics. Personally, I'd like the
> tokenizer/DOM part to be a tad stricter
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Joao Eiras wrote:
>
> Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
>
> > > * Make embed legal. Give it up, people: object doesn't work and never
> > > will.
> > HTML5 will make legal.
>
> Object works pretty fine. embed is duplicated functionality, not as flexible
> and
Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
* Make embed legal. Give it up, people: object doesn't work and never
will.
HTML5 will make legal.
Object works pretty fine. embed is duplicated functionality, not as
flexible and accessible as object.
Browsers will continue to suport embed
Hey Joe,
Joe Clark wrote:
> http://blog.fawny.org/2006/10/28/tbl-html/
Note that in general I would encourage you to post your suggestions
straight to the WHATWG list, as it is not guarenteed that I will always
see your blog posts (though in this case, at least three separate systems
and peop
On 10/30/06, Anders Rundgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Michael(tm) Smith" wrote:
>> It is equally interesting that W3C intends to start a new browser
>> authentication WG but have excluded digital signatures and key
>> provisioning from the charter in spite of the fact that about 10M
>> people
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:56:19 +1000, Henri Sivonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Oct 29, 2006, at 19:16, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
So what comes out will probably be a (perhaps evolved) version of
WHATWG stuff, as has been the case in some other W3C groups already.
That would be excellen
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 05:04:46 +0100, J. King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
There was at least one major issue in WF2 that came out from actually
*implementing*.
What was the problem?
Specific problems included the maxlength="" attribute (which is now
changed in the specification) and the new
On Oct 29, 2006, at 19:16, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
So what comes out will probably be a (perhaps evolved) version of
WHATWG stuff, as has been the case in some other W3C groups already.
That would be excellent.
Perhaps I was overly worried, because I couldn't tell from the
announceme
On Oct 30, 2006, at 01:32, Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells wrote:
Henri Sivonen wrote:
Does the W3C now accept that HTML is not in practice an
application of SGML?
Why do you believe this to be important, Henri ?
HTML was not an application of SGML to begin with. It was inspired by
SGML a
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 02:04:04 +0100, Karl Dubost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Though IMHO, layout engines are just one part of it. As I said above
parsing libraries, indexing bots, authoring tools are as MUCH important,
specifically if we want to stop the generation of tag soup.
It's not about
35 matches
Mail list logo
