On 3/1/07, Lachlan Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shadow2531 wrote:
On 2/28/07, Anne van Kesteren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Opera has some internal expiremental builds with an implementation of a
video element. The element exposes a simple API (for the moment) much
like the Audio() object:
I
On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 03:11:06 +0100, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 15 Apr 2005, David Håsäther wrote:
The Pixels parameter entity replacement text should be NUMBER instead
of CDATA since the comment says integer representing length in
pixels.
Also, the entity is only used once
On Mar 1, 2007, at 12:21, David Håsäther wrote:
Yes, I didn't know that at the time, and there was a DTD lying
around somewhere IIRC.
I think you mean http://syntax.whatwg.org/ . It is abandoned.
--
Henri Sivonen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 06:27:45 +0100, Shadow2531 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Opera has some internal expiremental builds with an implementation of a
video element. The element exposes a simple API (for the moment) much
like the Audio() object:
I think it'd be cool if the video element *just*
On Mar 1, 2007, at 08:26, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
The browser could send along the list of supported MIME types in
it's accept header for video formats, like:
Accept: application/ogg, video/mpeg, video/mp4, application/mp4,
video/quicktime, */*;q=0.1
Content negotiation is like a box of
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
I'm not sure what fallback has to do with interoperability.
Fallback allows text mode browsers or video plugins that do not support
a given codec to access the essential information. Hence it makes for a
form of communication interoperable with a wide range of devices.
Also sprach Bjoern Hoehrmann:
Opera has some internal expiremental builds with an implementation of a
video element. The element exposes a simple API (for the moment) much
like the Audio() object:
play()
pause()
stop()
May I suggest Opera does not implement
Also sprach Shadow2531:
I think it'd be cool if the video element *just* supported theora.
It's an interesting proposal.
Traditionally, HTML/CSS hasn't said anything about which image/icon
formats to support. Given, however, that (a) our ultimate goal is
interoperability and that (b) many
On 1 Mar 2007, at 11:56, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
That's one of the reasons a dedicated element is better than
reusing the object element. All the new video specific APIs would
otherwise have to be defined for all possible things the object
element can represent (images, nested browser
Håkon Wium Lie wrote:
I think we want to make video a first class citizen of the web.
Arguably it already is. It just hasn't been implemented in a
easy-to-author, UA-interoperable, or end-user accessible fashion.
That means, IMHO, that there must be a simple way to add video to HTML
pages.
Anne van Kesteren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Opera has some internal expiremental builds with an implementation of a
video element.
I've observed widespread frustration amongst authors on how to offer
audio and/or video on web pages. Quite a few have started using Flash
since apparently it takes
Spartanicus wrote:
Another current common frustration amongst authors is how to get file
based media files to play before they've been fully downloaded. This is
currently achieved by using text based redirector files containing the
url to the actual media file, but these redirector formats have
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005, Hallvord R M Steen wrote:
often a page needs to interact with a plugin and tell it to load another
file. Today this is of course done with JavaScript, which is difficult
because most plugins have different JS interfaces, and there are also
differences between the
- Original Message -
From: Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Matthew Raymond [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: WHAT WG List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 9:38 PM
Subject: Re: [whatwg] Ideas regarding Web Applications 1.0
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, Matthew Raymond wrote:
On 3/1/07, Håkon Wium Lie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also sprach Shadow2531:
I think it'd be cool if the video element *just* supported theora.
It's an interesting proposal.
Traditionally, HTML/CSS hasn't said anything about which image/icon
formats to support. Given, however, that (a) our
15 matches
Mail list logo
