Keryx Web wrote on 26/03/08 08:44:
...
This is from Thomas Thomassen on WSG's list:
As I was working on this I wanted to mark up a list where items had
been added and removed. That's when I realised that you can't wrap up
li dt or dd in del or ins elements because ul, ol and
Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
I don't know what use this observation is. Maybe it means ins, del,
and mark shouldn't be HTML elements, but should be something else instead.
Excellent post. I have to add that from a Wysisyg editor's perspective,
and I said it many times in the past, ins and del
On 2 Apr 2008, at 12:43 pm, Daniel Glazman wrote:
Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
I don't know what use this observation is. Maybe it means ins,
del,
and mark shouldn't be HTML elements, but should be something else
instead.
Excellent post.
I concur. Excellent summary of how these elements
Nicholas Shanks wrote:
The only way I can see to have these in a well-formed DOM is by using
empty elements for both the start and end.
p…ins-start/…/pp…ins-end/…/p
Right. Coming from the SGML world, that's called paired elements
and they're usually linked through id and idref. That's how a
I agree, very insightful post, MPT. You cut to the true issues quicker than
we were doing earlier. ^_^
Nicholas Shanks, you may well be right. ins/del/mark (idm) are a form
of embedded metadata, but how would we extract such out of the html flow?
This isn't metadata about the document, after
On 2 Apr 2008, at 4:53 pm, Krzysztof Żelechowski wrote:
Dnia 01-04-2008, Wt o godzinie 23:38 +0100, David Gerard pisze:
The actual solution is a large amount of compelling content in Theora
or similar. Wikimedia is working on this, though we're presently
hampered by a severe lack of money
Dnia 28-03-2008, Pt o godzinie 13:29 -0500, Tab Atkins Jr. pisze:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Krzysztof Żelechowski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dnia 28-03-2008, Pt o godzinie 09:12 -0500, Tab Atkins Jr.
pisze:
And the original problem can
I wrote:
From my perspective, and for what it's worth, I doubt that
the ideals of the W3C as expressed in 3.12.7.1 http://3.12.7.1
would
result in a situation that would be superior to simply letting the
international standards body for audio and video codecs deal with
these
technological
Nicholas Shanks wrote:
Hi Daniel.
You've obviously had these issues on your mind a long time.
Oh, 16 years only... :-)
What is the benefit of the @start attribute on the ending tag? Shouldn't
the @end attribute be sufficient. I fear that if you let HTML authors
loose with something like
On 2 Apr 2008, at 16:55, Robert J Crisler wrote:
It will be very, very difficult to develop critical mass for content
encoded in Theora (or Dirac), much less ubiquity. I'm not saying
there's no point in trying. I applaud the effort, though I have
misgivings about the W3C setting itself up
Dnia 02-04-2008, Śr o godzinie 10:55 -0500, Robert J Crisler pisze:
Why should the W3C choose not create a better situation than the
current one (which is a mess for developers and a mess for users),
while continuing to work on the ideal?
With all due respect:
the mission of the WWW
11 matches
Mail list logo
